API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Lesta

9 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-29 0820 +fivedoors

Lesta
Jan 28th, 2016
47
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 6.41 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-29 0820 +fivedoors
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-9-Dr2JxNw&lc=z13uu5ag4ov3flaic04cczpgts2mvpqxlkc0k
  3. https://pastebin.com/kmrTR72f
  4. shadow belief; truther mafia
  5. __
  6.  
  7.  
  8. +fivedoors __ [I appreciate your comments and I do encourage more! This will be a moderately long reply. I need more people like yourself to be commenting on my videos to attract the right kind of audience etc.] At no stage were we shown "evidence". At all times we were shown the appearances of proof only. Mistaking proof's appearances for proof is one way how belief is created (according to Lesta's lie system lexicon this kind of belief is called a "shadow belief" - it may or may not be a true belief but it has been formed and founded on trust and proof's appearances and not for true reasons via "sufficient proof").
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15.  
  16. Once a belief exists (shadow or otherwise) the person holding that belief becomes *belief controlled.* A belief controlled person can only perceive and respond to things (i.e., "stimulus", "data", "information", "sensory input", etc.) *in a way that conforms to their belief.* Being belief controlled limits the kind of thoughts, ideas and feelings that arise within the individual. It is that person's personality which determines which of the "options" they go with. *Thus to manipulate a person and control their behaviour all you have to do is impress upon them the right belief* and everything else will take care of itself (though this reply isn't about that - that is what genuine "mind control" is about). In this situation (the "doxing" video) a belief controlled person simply sees a person getting "doxed". Any *oddities or anomalies* surrounding the "doxing" [such as the ridiculous premises of *how* he got "doxed" in the first place] will be "explained away" via variously creative and imaginative "plausible explanations" that are *limited only by the belief controlled person's natural intelligence and imagination.*
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23.  
  24. A belief controlled person simply believes that they are seeing a person get doxed. _It's as simple as that._ And besides - if that wasn't really happening then wouldn't the "experts" (i.e., in this case the "Truther Gurus" discussing this issue) say something? Wouldn't the "truther channels" (i.e., the "honest researchers") call the "doxing" itself into question? The belief controlled person reasons that they would and since that hasn't happened then it is taken as tacit acknowledgement of it being a *real/genuine "doxing".* Any doubts that may have arisen due to the "doxing" not "looking right" are thus suppressed (this falls under "doubt suppression training" - but this reply isn't about that).
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31.  
  32. Why wouldn't a "truther channel" say something? There are three primary reasons why not. 1) Because the "truther channels" are themselves belief controlled (they also believe they are seeing a genuine "doxing"). Again, this belief - _because it is based on proof's appearances and not proof itself [thus a "shadow belief"]_ - is formed and founded on *trust* and proof's appearances. This is no different to the way "normal people" form beliefs about "news events" when watching the nightly news. It is the same principle at work.
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39.  
  40. 2) The second reason is an extension of the first. It could simply be that the person is not knowledgeable enough to know that the "doxing" - _as alleged_ - is impossible. But this also defaults to "belief control". For example there may exist a belief that *"hackers can do anything with computers"* and since the "hacker" in this example "demonstrated knowledge of computers and the Internet" therefore the claim is perhaps possible. If that is the case then I would call the person ("truther channel") a "worthless researcher" *because each "proof point" should have been scrutinised.* I.e., constantly asking _"Is this even possible?"_ and _"Is there an example of this being the case?"_ (i.e., "Why do I believe this is even real and possible?" - _this requires constant effort_ - being a "truther" *is not* for lazy and stupid people.) And if the "truther researcher" cannot answer the question *then they are not qualified to talk about this specific "drama"* (they should instead ask about "doxing" in general and not refer to this *specific* alleged example of it).
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47.  
  48. However, there is a third reason why a "truther channel" would not say something. 3) With this latest "truther drama" I suggest that you have stumbled upon the *"Truther Mafia"* itself (which has a presence on YouTube). In this instance it means those who are *"in on the con"* or *"in on creating and encouraging a false belief of it being real".* (If a person is going along with it for their own reasons then that person would be functioning as a "useful idiot" of the "Truther Mafia".)
  49.  
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55.  
  56. *Who is a member of the "Truther Mafia"?* Potentially anyone who is talking about this issue [*in any way*] _*without also*_ questioning the very premises of the "doxing" [which are outrageously BS]. A person who "goes along with it" is thus either a *worthless researcher* or is themselves a part of the *"Truther Mafia".*
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62.  
  63.  
  64. Finally, and this is important: any person who has gone along with this must be given the benefit of the doubt (unless there is a reason to already suspect them). But if that person is subsequently *made aware* that the "doxing" *cannot have happened* (as alleged - i.e., it is impossible and thus make-believe) but remains loyal to the idea it is genuine or "did happen" etc. *then that person has revealed himself or herself as being either intellectually dishonest or a member of the "Truther Mafia"*. _What person would insist to others that it is raining when outside everyone can see that it is a perfectly sunny day?_
  65.  
  66.  
  67.  
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71.  
  72. *_Please also see my comment here (elsewhere on this page):_* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-9-Dr2JxNw&lc=z13zhxjpxvmntbaqk04cczaovlfaungwxp40k
  73.  
  74.  
  75.  
  76.  
  77.  
  78.  
  79.  
  80.  
  81.  
  82.  
  83. __________________________________________
  84. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  85. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  86.  
  87. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  88. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  89.  
  90. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  91. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  92.  
  93. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  94. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!