Anti-White & White Interests

White Interests Include

-Not having themselves cast as the eternal scapegoat, responsible indirectly and abstractly for the failures of others; their behavior pathologized and existence demonized for this reason; or by dint of not working toward some Harmonious Egalitarian Future which will never be achieved and requires great sacrifice or submission to fall uniquely on their part (and are still bad even if they do it, and consequently on the hook if it doesnt succeed based on point 1)

Whatever you think the reason for chronic black underachievement, no social policy for 50 years has fixed it so now we have reached the newest iteration: that whites are at fault for something about their being and behavior. I am not putting the future of an entire group on the hook for this repeated inability to solve it

https://archive.is/mzvFf


-And not being demographically dispossessed (which is having your vote marginalized like we say voting ID laws do)

-Institutionally marginalized, etc

The game played is to demand something more than this when this is enough to say there is a bias against a group. Just as blacks can have their interests hurt via voting ID laws, or societal messages that their behavior is problematic or their qualities are lesser. One doesnt require direct discrimination to say something is against white interests (and there is active discrimination anyway).

Leftists often argue that if it doesnt amount to physical harm it isnt real too, a contradiction from their typical worldview.

Or that whites are too privileged. Which is itself pathologizing white behavior by claiming success is unearned in some part. But never extend this line of thinking to groups which do better than whites. They get to participate in oppression olympics

Or that this is just cherry-picked and therefore unimportant. But they can't cherrypick some articles or academic output doing the same for other groups. And when articles are too negative toward other groups, they flip out. But obviously reactions are hard to track. The most they can do is produce a dailystormer article. Which isnt a powerful instution or news org informing our elites (and I wouldnt say they dont actually dislike black people)

These products of these media and academic institutions arent just comments. They are from elite news organs and academia, with no similar statements made about other groups. These form elite consensus


And often they stupidly regurgitate the justified-by-historical-oppression aspect of the anti-white narrative despite that being an activity every group partakes in (and doesnt actually explain achievement gaps, see Jews) when cornered. Which is... point proven

They'll try to save face by saying this is just a corrective, but they make it a zero-sum game when they talk about attacking whiteness.

They try to appear more moderate than they are, they know their real opinions are a liability in this conversation given the limited space to justify themselves, so you have to tease out things like "they dont even believe in integration for new immigrants" or "they think the white family is a harmful social construct"