Dest

1. It isn't one guy

2. Presents himself as a consequentialist but really isn't. Doesn't like race realism because he sees racism as a deontological wrong even if it is responding to a real difference. He might say he sees racism as a negative consequence, but then everyone is a consequentialist if they dispute something on the grounds of introducing an ill precedent or justification, ie a moral qualm. I could say incest is wrong in that it lessens stigma against deleterious habits and norms to relax it, or that cp is wrong because it suggests enabling deviancy is okay if it is easier than simply resisting it. in bkth casss I could say society is in fact no longer projecting an ideal of sexual restraint and no longer stigmatixing poor sexual behavior associated with bad personality traits or outcomes in general, which will go on. And we will not be exercising full control of this situation. After all, the logic of both could be used to argue pedophilia should be lrgal. If co lowers abuse rates, certainly protected and cknsented intercourse would too right? Children are sexual beings I am told.

Of course, this would be foul. And the reason we have such strong disgust reactions is rooted I'm some kind of biological desire to sniff out deviants and creeps, for so,e reason. And the people who push for these sports of things.... one wonders if an evolutionary alarm bell is going off