Download Full Movie Fury In Hindi



********************
Download Full Movie Fury In Hindi
http://urllio.com/r0l7t
(Copy & Paste link)
********************


1945, in World War II Germany, the tough Sergeant Don &#39;Wardaddy&#39; Collier commands a tank and survives a German attack with his veteran crew composed of Boyd &#39;Bible&#39; Swan, Trini &#39;Gordo&#39; Garcia and Grady &#39;Coon-Ass&#39; Travis. He receives a rookie soldier Norman Ellison as the substitute for his deceased gunner and he tries to harden the youth along the way.
April, 1945. As the Allies make their final push in the European Theatre, a battle-hardened Army sergeant named Wardaddy commands a Sherman tank and his five-man crew on a deadly mission behind enemy lines. Outnumbered, out-gunned, and with a rookie soldier thrust into their platoon, Wardaddy and his men face overwhelming odds in their heroic attempts to strike at the heart of Nazi Germany.
So based on the IMDb score I had fairly high hopes for this film, in addition to the fact it has some very nice actors in there who have proved their mettle. I was expecting a 7,5-8,0 and what I got felt more like 6,0 out of 10.<br/><br/>Warning, spoiler alerts!<br/><br/>This film has some terribly poor shot scenes that show off Hollywood&#39;s preference to &quot;action&quot; and &quot;drama&quot; rather than toning it down a bit and thus creating some actual suspense (Check out Das Boot for example if you want to see how it should have been done in terms of building suspense and character development).<br/><br/>I was literally laughing at my TV when the scene came along where Brad Pitt&#39;s brigade has to attack At cannons through an open field:<br/><br/>1. Why not flank them? Well, because Shermans were so well known for their fantastic frontal armour so those shots will bounce right off for right? And sure we have no intel on what they have for weaponry or numbers but I&#39;m sure their calibre and skill of the crew will be so feeble that they will LITERALLY miss 3-4 shots fired straight at a bunch of Sherman tanks actually moving at walking speed. <br/><br/>Because obviously German AT crews firing AP shells from cover would surely miss multiple times at a distance of a only a few 100 yards with a precision engineered high powered antitank cannon. That&#39;s way beyond suspending of disbelief here.<br/><br/>2. The scene that really killed the film for me is the part where they get into a house with the 2 German women and they have a dinner. That part was actually nice, where Brad Pitt&#39;s character actually tries to get a bit of the normal world back among the madness of war. But the following scene just shouts Hollywood&#39;s misunderstanding of what drama is all over it. Way before the mortar barrage starts I was already telling myself &#39;If I was a really BAD scriptwriter I&#39;d have an enemy counter attack hitting the village right when they come out and of course a stray shell utterly destroys the building they were just in killing the women they had just sort of bonded with.&#39; And so it happened.<br/><br/>Clever scriptwriting and dramatic impact? No, Hollywood &quot;geniuses&quot;, that&#39;s just called playing the &#39;Lazy Captain Obvious&#39; card.<br/><br/>The film had potential but stuff such as described above just killed it, well that and all the usual clichés:<br/><br/><ul><li>Rookie joining an experienced crew - Rookie gets pushed around a lot - Rookie eventually somehow proves himself - The guys on the Fury tank are mostly just the standard stereotypes (preachy kind of guy, redneck hillbilly) and we&#39;re supposed to accept what they do and care about them because they&#39;ve been through rough times. The only 2 interesting characters are Brad Pitt and the rookie, the rest is utterly forgettable/interchangeable. - The German soldiers are all either nameless thugs (Well safe for 1 scene) or just purely evil and can be shot without something like a trial even though they&#39;re unarmed and have surrendered (Private Ryan did so much better a job about what war does to people and how soldiers try to preserve their humanity (think about the final scene of that film).</li></ul><br/><br/>Such a letdown.
You might like :<br/><br/><ul><li>Brad Pitt. Because, whether you like him or not, this guy has enough on-screen charisma to keep you glued to your seat even if the movie was written by Kristen Stewart. - The credible performance of Shia LaBoeuf, Logan Lerman, and Jon Bernthal. - The outstanding makeup. All wounds look believable. - The editing: it&#39;s fast-paced but doesn&#39;t make you dizzy, as there is very little use of the shaky cam. </li></ul><br/><br/>You might not like :<br/><br/><ul><li>The plot, or lack thereof. There isn&#39;t a story per se, this seems like an episode from a long series. - The extreme gore and violence. I&#39;m fine with it, but some of you might not be, so don&#39;t watch it if you&#39;re faint of heart. - The inevitable American pride speeches.</li></ul>
The film itself is a lumbering tank of a movie, chunky, loud, and clumsy, mulching down men into meat as proof of its dramatic seriousness and gloomy worldview.
His tank was the first one destroyed in the battle with the Tiger tank. These are not laser beams, they are &quot;tracer rounds&quot;. They are typically loaded in machine guns and tank shells as a way to determine where the rounds are actually firing. Should they miss, you can adjust your aim accordingly by watching the direction the round is firing. The average lifespan can&#39;t really be confirmed. But it is a generalization that Allied tank crews suffered heavy losses at the hands of the superior German armour, which is true. The Sherman tank was used by the Allies in every theatre of World War 2 and was famed for its speed, maneuverability, reliability, ease of mass production and ease of repair/maintenance. However, its&#39; initial 75mm, and later on 76mm gun, was generally incapable of penetrating the main armour of its&#39; German counterparts, the Panther, Tiger 1E, and later King Tiger. The Panther&#39;s high-velocity 75mm gun, and the Tiger and King Tiger&#39;s 88mm gun (initially designed for anti-aircraft roles) could easily defeat the Sherman&#39;s armoured protection, as could German infantry anti-tank weapons. The Sherman&#39;s high profile also made it comparatively easy to spot, and its&#39; use of a petrol (gasoline) engine gave it an unfortunate propensity to burst into flames when hit. British and Canadian troops nicknamed them &#39;Ronsons&#39; due to this fact in reference to a brand of cigarette lighters that are guaranteed to &#39;Light every time&#39;. The Germans rather more bluntly referred to them as &#39;Tommy cookers&#39;. The German tanks also used petrol engines, but one model of the Sherman, the M4A2, did use a diesel engine, but most of its production went to the US Marines in the Pacific, and the Russians.<br/><br/>You can find the armor stats for almost any armored fighting vehicle in history online. Look up the Tiger I, King Tiger, and the Panther; both later models had sloped armor which greatly added to deflecting armor piercing rounds, compared that with the Sherman. It was simply pitiful for the General in charge of Ground Forces, Lesley McNair, to be allowed to send so many soldiers into battle in such an inferior weapon, that was practically obsolescent after the introduction of the Tiger. But the Sherman was designed as an infantry support tank, not a tank-vs-tank unit, like its German opponents (and most modern-day &#39;main battle&#39; tanks).<br/><br/>Generally, German tanks were technically superior to Allied tanks. The problem the Germans had was that with a war on two fronts, and heavy Allied bombing, they simply couldn&#39;t produce the tanks quick enough. Their tanks were also over-engineered, and units produced towards the end of the war tended to break down too easily. Additionally, on the last year, they also ran out of manpower to crew the tanks. The Tiger tank was a heavy tank at 54 tonnes, versus the Sherman at 30-33.5 tonnes but (as shown by the film) it could only be knocked out by the Sherman&#39;s cannon at close quarters, from the side or behind where the armor was thinner. The Sherman could also do it with the specialized 76mm High-Velocity Armor-Piercing ammunition (type M93 HVAP) but this was in very limited supply, and priority went to the M36 &#39;Jackson&#39; and other tank destroyers. Battlefield comments from Normandy onwards showed that on average it took the loss of 7 Shermans to knock out one Tiger tank. The US did, however, have a lot more tanks than the Germans. The German antitank weapon called the Panzerfaust (seen in the film, being pulled from its packing crates in the darkness) was also greatly feared by Allied tank crews. The one-shot LAW-type device had a hollow charge and could knock out any Allied tank at close range (the Panzerschreck was a heavier reloadable bazooka-like weapon). During the last months of the war in Europe, the Allies also had greatly superior air power as well and this helped to negate the tank advantage on the ground that the Germans had. The film showcases the Sherman&#39;s main strengths in combat - bristling with machine guns (including the powerful .50 M2HB, nicknamed the &#39;Fifty&#39; or &#39;Ma Deuce&#39;) and its maneuverability, which made it an excellent infantry support weapon.<br/><br/>Its interesting to note that the tanks shown in the movie were a mixed bag: &#39;Fury&#39; was an M4A2E8 (76)W HVSS Sherman tank, and &#39;Lucy Sue&#39; an M4A2 Sherman, but as you don&#39;t see the engine decks, so for sake of the story, they could be mistaken for petrol-fueled units (the A2&#39;s carried a diesel powerplant. &#39;Matador&#39; is an M4E8 (76)W HVSS Sherman, &#39;Murder, Inc.&#39; an M4A4 Sherman, and &#39;Old Phyllis&#39; an M4A1 (76)W Sherman. All but Lucy Sue were later &#39;W&#39; or wet-stowage ammunition types, and only Matador and Fury had the main gun capable of doing serious damage to the Tiger, and the later HVSS wide suspension track system. They carefully did not use the up-gunned British Shermans, which got a powerful 17-pounder QF gun of equivalent calibre to the 76mm, but with considerably more penetration - this Sherman was called the Firefly.  a5c7b9f00b