Advertisement
JaysonSunshine

Temporary, recursive beings

May 7th, 2018
123
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 20.21 KB | None | 0 0
  1. 6:02:13 PMⓘ Profound set mode +v chinesegirl8
  2. 6:02:25 PM+Thacker-we KNOW noise does more harm than good to ANY signal
  3. 6:02:29 PM+LowInformationVoterI desire more than zero citations from you, Thacker-.
  4. 6:02:38 PM+Thacker-ahh, hang on...
  5. 6:03:27 PM+LowInformationVoterHumans are very, very recent characters to this story.
  6. 6:03:57 PM+LowInformationVoterI'm at the scene with the jellyfish in the ocean.
  7. 6:03:57 PM+bradmajI see a "Citation-flood" post war coming up
  8. 6:04:09 PM+LowInformationVoterIt's fascinating to think of swimming in the ocean 500 million years ago.
  9. 6:04:16 PM+LowInformationVoterWould it feel like it was 500 million years ago?
  10. 6:04:22 PM+LowInformationVoterIt would feel like it is 'now'.
  11. 6:04:23 PM+bradmajLowInformationVoter, ye
  12. 6:04:29 PM+LowInformationVoterRight now is 500 million years ago, then.
  13. 6:04:32 PM+bradmajthe sun wouldn't be near as bright, for one thing
  14. 6:04:42 PM+bradmajthere wojuld be no mammals
  15. 6:04:50 PM+LowInformationVoterbradmaj: I wouldn't know there weren't any mammals.
  16. 6:04:55 PM+LowInformationVoterAnd the sun's brightness would be normal.
  17. 6:05:00 PM+bradmajthere woujld be one ginat continent
  18. 6:05:26 PM+bradmajLowInformationVoter, the sun has been geting brighter since it first ignited. it was dimmer in the past, and will be brighter in the future
  19. 6:05:35 PM+LowInformationVoterbradmaj: I believe that is true.
  20. 6:05:55 PM+LowInformationVoterThe point is that my perception of time is some belief I have that dissolves upon inspection
  21. 6:06:17 PM→ EricofAZ has joined
  22. 6:06:17 PMⓘ ChanServ set mode +o EricofAZ
  23. 6:06:22 PMⓘ BibleBot set mode +v EricofAZ
  24. 6:06:23 PM@EricofAZPlay nice.
  25. 6:06:27 PM+LowInformationVoterI enjoy the part of this scene in which Malick explores some of the abiotic aspects of Earth.
  26. 6:06:42 PM+LowInformationVoterThink of the millions of years some rocks 'watched' reality.
  27. 6:06:42 PM+Thacker-http://www.basfeijen.nl/evolution/cambrianexplosion.htm
  28. 6:06:47 PM+bradmajFrom Cornell.EDU
  29. 6:06:50 PM+bradmajThe Sun evolves very slowly over this time as it consumes Hydrogen in its core:
  30. 6:06:50 PM+bradmajgrows slightly larger
  31. 6:06:50 PM+bradmajgets slightly brighter
  32. 6:06:50 PM+bradmajtemperature gets slightly hotter
  33. 6:07:03 PM+LowInformationVoterBut I can only watch reality for a very short period of time because I believe I am unchanging.
  34. 6:07:05 PM+Thacker-there are better ciations, but at the moment that's all the time I'm going to spend on it
  35. 6:07:18 PM+LowInformationVoterWhat would it be like to be a rock in a cliff face.
  36. 6:07:20 PM+Thacker-still, the issue is, evolving systems
  37. 6:07:39 PM+Thacker-like it was before you were born
  38. 6:07:55 PM+LowInformationVoterThis form is just some form that can exist.
  39. 6:08:00 PM+LowInformationVoterThe matter in this form was once a rock.
  40. 6:08:09 PM+LowInformationVoterAnd in this pattern it has mastery over natural language so it talks to you.
  41. 6:08:09 PM+bradmajFrom "northwestern.edu"
  42. 6:08:10 PM+Thacker-like the computer you have
  43. 6:08:14 PM+LowInformationVoterYep.
  44. 6:08:22 PM+LowInformationVoterI'm not me.
  45. 6:08:25 PM+LowInformationVoterI don't exist.
  46. 6:08:27 PM+bradmajSince its birth 4.5 billion years ago, the Sun's luminosity has very gently increased by about 30%.3 per billion years This is an inevitable evolution which comes about because, as the billions of years roll by, the Sun is burning up the hydrogen in its core.
  47. 6:08:35 PM+Thacker-reman, not likely, no
  48. 6:08:55 PM+Thacker-anyway, it looks like the conversation died with my quest
  49. 6:09:28 PM+LowInformationVoterThacker-: You appear to have cited a Christian website.
  50. 6:09:37 PM+LowInformationVoterThis seems unacceptable.
  51. 6:09:40 PM+Thacker-why?
  52. 6:09:45 PM+Thacker-did you read it?
  53. 6:09:51 PM+Thacker-what part do you dispute and why?
  54. 6:09:54 PM+LowInformationVoterI ctrl-f for "%" and "80".
  55. 6:09:57 PM+LowInformationVoterWith zero hits.
  56. 6:10:11 PM+Thacker-ahh, yeah, I didn't take the time to drill that out
  57. 6:10:21 PM+LowInformationVoterI also noticed in the opening paragraph that the writer was overemphasizing Darwin's views when it comes to the truth value of evolution.
  58. 6:10:27 PM+LowInformationVoterEvolution as a idea is independent of Darwin.
  59. 6:10:34 PM+Thacker-the explosion of the body plans was a mystery to Darwin and remains one today for Darwinists
  60. 6:10:55 PM+LowInformationVoterThacker-: Over how much time do you think the Cambrian explosion occurred?
  61. 6:10:56 PM+Thacker-oh, what are the salient differences?
  62. 6:11:04 PM+Thacker-its hard to tell
  63. 6:11:22 PM+Thacker-there's nothing in strata previous to it
  64. 6:11:46 PM+Thacker-not at least which explains the body plans of the Cambrain
  65. 6:11:58 PM+Thacker-and to date, there's no viable explanation for it
  66. 6:12:06 PM+LowInformationVoterThacker-: What do you think the Cambrian radiation demonstrates?
  67. 6:12:24 PM+Thacker-yeah, an asteroid hit the planet, and water spilled on my keyboard, and PRESTO, my com became AI
  68. 6:12:33 PM+Thacker-the dating?
  69. 6:12:36 PM+LowInformationVoterI think it demonstrates that evolutionary processes through multiple interacting ecosystems can, and sometimes do, show higher rates of change than at other times.
  70. 6:12:54 PM+Thacker-reman, keep reading my statement
  71. 6:12:59 PM+LowInformationVoterThacker-: The information content of your last post was about 50bytes.
  72. 6:13:06 PM+Thacker-<Thacker-> not at least which explains the body plans of the Cambrain
  73. 6:13:17 PM+LowInformationVoterHow much information do you think there was in the phenomena your 50bytes is describing?
  74. 6:13:26 PM+LowInformationVoterI'll estimate 10^50 bytes
  75. 6:13:40 PM+LowInformationVoterSo, your post probably is pretty far from the reality you're attempting to describe, right.
  76. 6:13:48 PM→ Jarod has joined
  77. 6:13:49 PM+Thacker-I very possibly, at least
  78. 6:13:50 PM+LowInformationVoterAnd that's because our brains are slow and dumb compared to biospheres.
  79. 6:13:51 PMⓘ Profound set mode +v Jarod
  80. 6:14:15 PM+Thacker-so are our coms
  81. 6:14:23 PM+Thacker-and they were worse 20yrs ago
  82. 6:14:37 PM+Thacker-reman, depends upon how far back you take it
  83. 6:15:02 PM+Thacker-if you really push it, the numbers REALLY go up
  84. 6:15:20 PM+LowInformationVoterThacker-: I give you a process workspace to analyze a graph problem with
  85. 6:15:23 PM+Thacker-it would include all the computations of all my predessors
  86. 6:15:27 PM+LowInformationVoterYour process has 8GB of working memory
  87. 6:15:44 PM+LowInformationVoterThe problem I wish you to solved is NP-Hard on a graph of 10^30 nodes
  88. 6:15:53 PM+Thacker-but, you do realize that this computation isn't natural, right?
  89. 6:15:54 PM+LowInformationVoterEach node contains 1kb of relevant data
  90. 6:16:00 PM+LowInformationVoterTell me, does your process understand the problem?
  91. 6:16:16 PM+LowInformationVoterIt doesn't, right
  92. 6:16:22 PM+Thacker-some of the terms are familiar, it would take time to parse it
  93. 6:16:26 PM+LowInformationVoterNow, the process has awareness of itself in its workspace
  94. 6:16:35 PM+LowInformationVoterThe process says, I have no idea how I came into existence!
  95. 6:16:43 PM+Thacker-another oddity, but ok
  96. 6:16:44 PM+LowInformationVoterThe 10^30 node graph problem contains the answer
  97. 6:16:55 PM+LowInformationVoterThis is the source of your mystery
  98. 6:17:15 PM+Thacker-that information, as you are describing it, exists at all is odd
  99. 6:17:20 PM+LowInformationVoterYour awareness is too limited to understand the dynamics across 4 billion years, across the surface of a planet, of the computing life function
  100. 6:17:32 PM+LowInformationVoterEven if I gave you the entire data set -- which we do not have -- you couldn't do anything with it
  101. 6:17:36 PM+LowInformationVoterIt's too complex for your brain
  102. 6:17:38 PM+Thacker-ehh, I get intuition is a poor guide
  103. 6:17:50 PM+Thacker-sure, we look for patterns, short cuts
  104. 6:18:06 PM+LowInformationVoterThacker-: We are smarter than any objects we encounter
  105. 6:18:14 PM+LowInformationVoterWe have very little sense of how stupid we are for this reason
  106. 6:18:15 PM+Thacker-generally yeah
  107. 6:18:22 PM+Thacker-not sure about that
  108. 6:18:25 PM+LowInformationVoterEvolution is an exceptionally complex function to compute
  109. 6:18:34 PM+Thacker-not sure about that either
  110. 6:18:44 PM+Thacker-slide rules worked for a reason
  111. 6:18:48 PM+LowInformationVoterThacker-: I want you to make a simulation of the Earth's biosphere
  112. 6:18:54 PM+LowInformationVoterHow complex is that
  113. 6:18:58 PM+Thacker-sure, they were cheats, but effective ones
  114. 6:19:19 PM+LowInformationVoterHow much information is there in a realistic simulation of a squirrel
  115. 6:19:22 PM+LowInformationVoter10^18 bytes?
  116. 6:19:24 PM+Thacker-fluid dynamics is about the most insanely complex system to model ever
  117. 6:19:26 PM+LowInformationVoter10^25?
  118. 6:19:44 PM+Thacker-particularly on ultra fine granes
  119. 6:19:47 PM+LowInformationVoterYou'll need that in order to figure out of the bones being produced in its left femur are strong enough for this jump its making
  120. 6:19:55 PM→ [michigan] has joined
  121. 6:19:57 PMⓘ Profound set mode +v [michigan]
  122. 6:20:02 PM+LowInformationVoterOh, but the wind is acting on the squirrel -- need to add those dynamics of the squirrel's jump
  123. 6:20:13 PM← [e] has quit (Ping timeout)
  124. 6:20:17 PM+LowInformationVoterOh, part of the environment reacts to the jumping squirrel, you'll need to model that
  125. 6:20:20 PM+Thacker-and the butterfly's wings too
  126. 6:20:24 PM+Thacker-sure
  127. 6:20:39 PM+LowInformationVoterYou'll need a model of the squirrel's brain to estimate how it makes its decisons
  128. 6:20:45 PM+Thacker-what you probably know is, I know this
  129. 6:20:51 PM+LowInformationVoterThis will roughly let you model a squirrel's life arc
  130. 6:20:55 PM+Thacker-and probably not like you know it
  131. 6:20:57 PM+LowInformationVoterIt's beyond the ability of contemporary science
  132. 6:21:07 PM+Thacker-sure, intuition is a poor guide
  133. 6:21:07 PM+LowInformationVoterNow, you need to do that for all lifeforms and abiotic factors in a region
  134. 6:21:13 PM→ Toph1 has joined
  135. 6:21:15 PMⓘ Profound set mode +v Toph1
  136. 6:21:18 PM+LowInformationVoterAnd then run that simulation for millions of years to observe changes in genomics
  137. 6:21:22 PM+LowInformationVoterYour brain can't do that
  138. 6:21:27 PM+LowInformationVoterSorry. We're too dumb
  139. 6:21:32 PM+Thacker-reman, I basically quoted (paraphrased) Einstein dude
  140. 6:21:33 PM+LowInformationVoterThis will remain a mystery to you forever
  141. 6:21:44 PM+LowInformationVoterSo, what can you do?
  142. 6:21:55 PM+LowInformationVoterYou can project that extremely complex object into a lower space through a lossy filter
  143. 6:21:55 PM+Thacker-low, umm huh
  144. 6:22:11 PM+Thacker-true
  145. 6:22:12 PM+LowInformationVoterAnd you get broad summarizations like 'evolution' and mathematical models of RNA evolution
  146. 6:22:20 PM+Thacker-you lose a lot of definition, but yeah
  147. 6:22:24 PM+LowInformationVoterAnd you get low fidelity models of intelligence, etc.
  148. 6:22:36 PM+LowInformationVoterThacker-: No system can fully model itself
  149. 6:22:42 PM+LowInformationVoterIt's forever uncomputable
  150. 6:22:48 PM+LowInformationVoterNo entity shall ever exist which can compute the universe
  151. 6:22:52 PM+LowInformationVoterOnly the universe can compute the universe
  152. 6:22:54 PM+Thacker-ehh, what are the odds of flipping 10 heads in a row?
  153. 6:23:01 PM+LowInformationVoterAnd its calculations are what we call reality
  154. 6:23:05 PM+Thacker-umm huh
  155. 6:23:08 PM+bradmajEinstein basicaly wasted the second half of his life trying to disporve Quantum Theory
  156. 6:23:10 PM+bradmajhe failed.
  157. 6:23:11 PM+Thacker-you're riffing now
  158. 6:23:39 PM+LowInformationVoterThacker-: Every computing process *must* use non-computing substrate material.
  159. 6:23:41 PM+Thacker-what are the odds?
  160. 6:23:50 PM+Thacker-not sure that's true
  161. 6:23:54 PM+LowInformationVoterThat non-computing material affects the computations of the computing function in that substrate
  162. 6:24:19 PM+LowInformationVoterThat prevents the computing function from perfectly modeling itself *even in a small window of the universe*, say 1 cubic meter
  163. 6:24:20 PM+Thacker-low, dude, are you going to converse or riff, either is fine, but I'd like to know
  164. 6:24:31 PM+LowInformationVoterThis means its model of reality will diverge from the actual computations being done by the universe
  165. 6:24:37 PM+LowInformationVoterAnd, in time, it will be unable to retain its shape against entropy
  166. 6:24:44 PM+Thacker-if you want to riff, I'll kick back and just watch the buffer scroll
  167. 6:24:51 PM+LowInformationVoterI'll pause
  168. 6:25:06 PM* LowInformationVoter smiles a squirrel smile
  169. 6:25:18 PM+LowInformationVoterI'd like to share a song with you, Thacker-
  170. 6:25:23 PM+LowInformationVoterFor you to experience with this topic
  171. 6:25:29 PM+LowInformationVoterhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c-RbGZBnBI
  172. 6:25:38 PM+Thacker-sure, I get that we have difficulty rapping our minds around massively complex systems
  173. 6:25:41 PM+LowInformationVoterThe song is about the finiteness of your existence and your coming dissolution to entropy
  174. 6:25:50 PM+Thacker-geeze
  175. 6:25:55 PM+LowInformationVoterIt's good
  176. 6:25:59 PM+Thacker-umm huh
  177. 6:26:13 PM+LowInformationVoterIt's not just that some of these problems are hard
  178. 6:26:15 PM+Thacker-I'm feeling you're wandering off here...
  179. 6:26:19 PM+LowInformationVoterSome of them are *forever hard*
  180. 6:26:23 PM+LowInformationVoterIt's important to understand that
  181. 6:26:25 PM+Thacker-we don't know that
  182. 6:26:37 PM+LowInformationVoterIf you compute the earth's surface into computronium, it won't fully understand itself
  183. 6:26:50 PM+LowInformationVoterthough, it will know many things you do not know
  184. 6:26:57 PM+Thacker-no, it won't
  185. 6:27:01 PM+Thacker-and that's the point
  186. 6:27:08 PM+LowInformationVoterIt won't what?
  187. 6:27:09 PM+Thacker-no more than you knew before you were born
  188. 6:27:12 PM+Thacker-or after you die
  189. 6:27:28 PM+Thacker-"know many things you do not know"
  190. 6:27:39 PM+Thacker-information doesn't exist apart from intelligence
  191. 6:28:02 PM+Thacker-the "knower"
  192. 6:28:22 PM+LowInformationVoterThis will be my monument, Thacker-
  193. 6:28:27 PM+LowInformationVoterThis conversation will be a beacon when we're gone
  194. 6:28:44 PM+Thacker-and it will disipate the moment we leave
  195. 6:28:51 PM+LowInformationVoterWe're little parts of the universe that became aware for a moment
  196. 6:29:05 PM+Thacker-umm huh, which is total bunk
  197. 6:29:05 PM+LowInformationVoterWe poked enough above the entropy to look back and say, That's me!
  198. 6:29:07 PM+Thacker-:)
  199. 6:29:11 PM+LowInformationVoterIf only for the briefest of cosmological moments
  200. 6:29:19 PM+Thacker-which is impossible by TD
  201. 6:29:21 PM+LowInformationVoterIn reality, it is the universe that has become aware
  202. 6:29:27 PM+Thacker-heh
  203. 6:29:29 PM+LowInformationVoterAnd part of its calls itself me
  204. 6:29:34 PM+Thacker-nope, it hasn't
  205. 6:29:37 PM+LowInformationVoterAnd part of it self calls itself Thacker
  206. 6:29:40 PM+Thacker-umm huh, nope
  207. 6:29:50 PM+LowInformationVoterAnd this conversation becomes a moment in my life
  208. 6:30:04 PM+Thacker-LOL, this is frutless, your monument is pointless
  209. 6:30:07 PM+LowInformationVoterhehe
  210. 6:30:12 PM+Thacker-and its all terminal
  211. 6:30:24 PM+Thacker-a poor player who struts and frets...
  212. 6:30:32 PM+LowInformationVoterThe universe is evolving independent of the local decisions by some apes to build monuments -- agreed
  213. 6:30:42 PM+LowInformationVoterDoes that frighten you
  214. 6:30:46 PM+Thacker-agree, no question about it
  215. 6:30:55 PM+Thacker-nope
  216. 6:31:09 PM+LowInformationVoterMe neither ;)
  217. 6:31:17 PM+Thacker-if you internalized that, it should and WILL distrub you
  218. 6:31:26 PM+LowInformationVoterThe universe once featured a breaking of symmetry
  219. 6:31:40 PM+LowInformationVoterThat heterogeneity eventually lead to 'fusion' and 'planets'
  220. 6:31:41 PM+Thacker-umm huh
  221. 6:32:00 PM+LowInformationVoterOn those planets, those unequal local environments created gradients in various aspects of the universe
  222. 6:32:01 PM+Thacker-not sure that's true... but anyway
  223. 6:32:16 PM+Thacker-probably dark matter matricies
  224. 6:32:22 PM+Thacker-but anyway
  225. 6:32:24 PM+LowInformationVoterDifferent shapes fell down those gradients, and some began to have 'state'
  226. 6:32:35 PM+LowInformationVoterThese shapes could replicate themselves with some fidelity
  227. 6:32:47 PM+Thacker-dude, bless your heart, but, you sound like you're smokin dope
  228. 6:32:50 PM+LowInformationVoterEventually, some of these shapes coordinated the actions of other shapes in proximity
  229. 6:32:54 PM+LowInformationVoterWe called those 'neurons'
  230. 6:32:59 PM+Thacker-I'm betting you are
  231. 6:33:09 PM+Thacker-and feelin fine...
  232. 6:33:09 PM← Banquo has quit (Quit:)
  233. 6:33:16 PM+LowInformationVoterOne day, about 40 years ago, one of those shapes made a baby shape that was 'you'
  234. 6:33:17 PM+Thacker-so enjoy the high...
  235. 6:33:24 PM+LowInformationVoterAnd now you're here, with me, wondering what it all means
  236. 6:33:38 PM+LowInformationVoterIt means there were asymmetries in the original universal state
  237. 6:33:39 PM+LowInformationVoterThat's it
  238. 6:34:07 PM+LowInformationVoterAnd now we're dancing to Monument by Royksopp, some Norwegian electronica band
  239. 6:34:18 PM+LowInformationVoterWondering what it means to be a self-aware, temporary shape contemplating Universe
  240. 6:34:31 PM+LowInformationVoterThat's kinda neat :)
  241. 6:35:30 PM← Toph1 has quit (Quit: Leaving)
  242. 6:36:05 PM+LowInformationVoterExistence is pretty big
  243. 6:36:22 PM+LowInformationVoterYou got this one humans telling me to create monuments to love
  244. 6:36:35 PM+LowInformationVoterThese other humans are telling me about Jesus in the sky and everlasting laugh -- the game doesn't have to end!
  245. 6:36:48 PM+LowInformationVoterThis one Buddha human tells me all of the past is gone and that my entire life arc is a story I've created
  246. 6:37:14 PM+LowInformationVoterWe've got anti-natalists telling us that self-awareness is a tragic misstep in evolution -- a part of nature separate from itself
  247. 6:37:28 PM+LowInformationVoterWe've got snails exploring leaves, sniffing with their appendages
  248. 6:37:33 PM+LowInformationVoterWe've got rocks in silent contemplation
  249. 6:37:42 PM← RenaissanceMan has left
  250. 6:37:54 PM+LowInformationVoterWe've got Thacker- worrying about gradients and entropy calculations in open systems
  251. 6:39:11 PM+LowInformationVoterhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bag1gUxuU0g
  252. 6:39:36 PM+bradmajwe've got skies of blue, red roses too
  253. 6:40:11 PM+LowInformationVoterhehe
  254. 6:40:17 PM+LowInformationVoterThacker-: We're born to die
  255. 6:40:58 PM→ Kalamity has joined
  256. 6:41:01 PMⓘ Profound set mode +v Kalamity
  257. 6:41:03 PM+LowInformationVoterSelf-contemplating computational processes rushing to expand our working memory for ever more accurate simulations until the day our asymptotic errors finally catch up and we can't bound risk any further
  258. 6:42:55 PM+LowInformationVoter"I was so confused as a little child Tried to take what I could get Scared that I couldn't find All the answers honey; Don’t make me sad, don’t make me cry Sometimes love is not enough and the road gets tough I don’t know why Keep making me laugh Let's go get high The road is long, we carry on Try to have fun in the meantime
  259. 6:43:25 PM+LowInformationVoterThe words of Prophet Del Rey
  260. 6:43:39 PM+LowInformationVoterLet them wash over you and realize they have as much insight as Frank the Tank or Buddha
  261. 6:44:39 PM+bradmajLester Del rey?
  262. 6:44:54 PM+LowInformationVoterThat's the one
  263. 6:45:28 PM+bradmajHe founded Del Rey books
  264. 6:45:28 PM+LowInformationVoterhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Py_-3di1yx0
  265. 6:45:37 PM+bradmajcontemporary of Isaac asimov
  266. 6:45:38 PM+LowInformationVoterLana has some truly epic commentaries on existence
  267. 6:45:53 PM+bradmajLester and Judy-Lynn Del rey
  268. 6:45:58 PM+bradmajI met both of 'em
  269. 6:47:54 PM+bradmajI think eventually Bantam/Doubleday/Dell bought ouot Del rey books
  270. 6:48:08 PM+LowInformationVoterI think the Ride monologue is one of the best poems I've ever read
  271. 6:48:18 PM+bradmajFrom Stephen king?
  272. 6:50:27 PM→ Crabapple has joined
  273. 6:50:29 PMⓘ Profound set mode +v Crabapple
  274. 6:50:31 PM→ QRT has joined
  275. 6:50:33 PMⓘ Profound set mode +v QRT
  276. 6:51:57 PM+LowInformationVoterI am humbled each time I listen to Lana Del Rey - Ride.
  277. 6:52:09 PM+LowInformationVoterYou can't help but acknowledge you are in the presence of a true artist.
  278. 6:52:30 PM+LowInformationVoterA temporary soul who flits into our shadowy existences to illuminate the possibilities we never knew existed.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement