Taproot activation meeting 2 public

Taproot activation meeting 2 - Tuesday 16th February 19:00 UTC ##taproot-activation channel

Arguments for LOT=true and LOT=false https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-February/018380.html

Additional argument for LOT=false from harding (F7) https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-February/018415.html

Activation parameters proposal Google Doc drafted by luke-jr: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ewnxxxc51_JWJLZQfqc5W55Pvkgcf9TEh6Ks3wiHbRk/edit?usp=sharing

StackExchange question on the threshold percentage: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/102684/what-is-the-point-of-miner-signaling-in-a-soft-fork-activation-mechanism-what-s/

Some aj math on the impact threshold percentage has on mined invalid block being in longest valid chain for different durations of time: https://twitter.com/ajtowns/status/1321277134225043457

nickler quick & dirty simulation showing that the probability of unupdated nodes to be on a >=2 block invalid chain is increased by about 4x. It assumes the worst case that lagging miners don't update after lock-in & accept non-standard transactions. https://github.com/jonasnick/bip8-tester/blob/master/threshold.py

If needed original harding wiki on the different activation proposals. We (hopefully) seem to have landed on BIP 8(1 year) https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Taproot_activation_proposals

UASF docs from 2017: https://github.com/OPUASF/UASF

luke-jr blog post on BIP 148 from 2017: https://medium.com/@lukedashjr/how-you-can-help-ensure-bip148-is-a-success-2fb63bf5114f

Matt Corallo on UASF and Taproot activation (TFTC podcast): https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/tftc-podcast/2021-02-11-matt-corallo-taproot-activation/

Andreas Antonopoulos on UASF (Let's Talk Bitcoin podcast, 2017): https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/lets-talk-bitcoin-podcast/2017-06-04-consensus-uasf-and-forks/