To maintain our intellectual rigor, below is a list of factors to keep in mind when assessing the credibility of Plandemic:
1. Mikovitz has a long-standing professional/personal beef with Fauci (cabal and/or cabal connected)
2. Mikovitz claimed she was arrested and processed through the courts and labeled a fugitive from justice in a case held under seal. She said she was only recently allowed to speak freely in public. It sounds like this was maybe an intellectual property dispute or something — unclear. But, given what we learned about lawfare (court corruption) from the General Flynn case, I think it’s reasonable to keep an open mind: she could have been abused by the court system in protection of the cabal.
3. Mikovitz is pushing her book. True, but she also released it for free.
4. Mikovitz wants to stir the pot. Probably true (can’t read her mind). If she is convinced she’s right and if the stakes are high, I could understand her coming forward.
5. Fauci directed the cover up and stands to make money through the NIAID, etc. This appears to be true.
6. Mikovitz was on a team in the 80s that helped isolate the HIV virus — a confirmatory study from the work of the Pasteur Institute.
7. Fauci and Dr. Robert Gallo wanted to spin the story a different way and interfered with the confirmatory study. Mikovitz asserts Fauci wanted a copy of the confirmatory paper and she refused (confidential). Fauci bullied the lead scientist to giving up the paper and delayed publication. In the meantime, Gallo wrote his own paper, took all the credit and patents. The delay contributed to HIV/AIDS spreading unnecessarily.
    1. I can’t speak to specifics of Mikovitz’s study or the industrial intrigue, however, I read the seminal book on the HIV/AIDS crisis published in 1987 called “And The Band Played On,” by Randy Shilts. The book extensively covered internecine battles between scientists. Shilts revealed Gallo to be a brilliant but spiteful, underhanded operator. He wanted the HIV/AIDS discovery because he was known as the godfather of retroviruses and there was a lot of money to be had. However, he couldn’t keep the virus alive in the lab. The Pasteur Institute solved the cell death problem and were first to isolate the virus they called LAV-BRU. When Gallo published his study isolating the virus called HTLV-3B, he claimed he was first (perhaps helped by the delay caused by Fauci). However, Gallo’s virus samples were originally from the Pasteur Institute (2 shipments: 1983 and 84) and the genetic study showed LAV-BRU and HTLV-3B were identical, literally from the same patient. https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1991-02-28-9101190209-story.html  (1991)
    2. Fauchi worked with Gallo during this time. “Under Fauci’s leadership, NIAID became the single largest funder of HIV/AIDS research in the world. His own lab’s research also has helped clarify fundamental relationships between the virus and the immune system. His job also put him in the hot seat with AIDS activists, who believed the federal government for the first decade was dragging its feet in its response to the epidemic. Fauci quoted a headline of an article published in The San Francisco Examiner in 1988 by Larry Kramer, who founded the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power, ACT UP. ‘I call you murderers, an open letter to an incompetent idiot, Dr. Anthony Fauci,’ it read.”https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/10/gathering-hivaids-pioneers-raw-memories-mix-current-conflicts# (2016)
    3. Sub 1 and 2 above are decades apart, independent corroborators of Mikovitz’s claims in Plandemic.
8. Mikovitz Fauchi has a spotty record in protecting the public if the delay was his fault and his focus was on lucrative pharmaceuticals. Probably true. I don’t know if IL-2 (interleukin-2) therapy was wrong. According to this article: https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/205/10/1479/948951  IL-2 was helpful to hep C patients more than patients with HIV-1 infection. And https://www.cochrane.org/CD009818/INFECTN_interleukin-2-adjunct-antiretroviral-therapy-hiv-positive-adults  “We found that IL-2 causes an increase in the CD4 immune cells (high certainty evidence). However, there is no difference in important effects such as death and other infections (high certainty evidence). There is probably an increase in side-effects for those people using IL-2 (moderate certainty evidence). Our findings do not support further use of IL-2 as an add-on treatment to ART in HIV-positive adults.” Therefore, after a brief search of stuff I don’t really understand, Mikovitz’s statement that Fauci’s IL-2 therapy was wrong appears likely true.
9. Is holding a patent and a solution vaccine a conflict of interest? Yes.
10. Repeal the Bayh–Dole Act (1980) — monetizing government research grants through trademarks/patents — definitely, agree. The taxpayer funded the research and they get the windfall, that’s wrong. Wealthy non-scientists like Gates are able to dabble in public health which is terrifying.
11. Global vaccinations could reap billions — yes.
12. Mikovitz is not anti-vaxx.
13. Covid-19 was manipulated in a lab. Independent research around the globe agrees with this assertion.
14. Labs involved: Fort Detrick, NC research triangle, and Wuhan Lab. Independent research confirms Wuhan as likely suspect. Mikovitz claims she personally tinkered with gains on ebola. The US government invested several millions in the Wuhan lab in 2014. The CDC board of directors is littered with NC research triangle people. Her claims about Detrick and NC are likely true.
15. “Liberal approach to mortality,” Mikovitz asserts an intentional overrepresentation of Covid-19 on diagnostics and death certificates. We have heard similar claims from doctors not connected to Mikovitz (as far as I know).
16. Increased charges for hospitals to the government for Covid-19 patients and treatments — true.
17. Why did so many in Italy (allegedly) die? [the numbers are in question per our Italian firebrand] Mikovitz said that in 2019, Italy received an untested, new form of influenza vaccine with 4 strains, including the “highly pathogenic” H1N1 grown in a dog cell line — dogs have lots of coronaviruses — and Italy assigned Covid-19 rather using stringent testing. Well, FLUCELVAX® QUADRIVALENT contains four different influenza viruses; two influenza A viruses and two influenza B viruses (A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2) B(Yam) B(Vic) ) available for the 2019 flu season. https://www.seqirus.com/news/seqirus-presents-scientific-data-comparing-circulating-influenza-b-viruses  It is considered “good” because it’s cost effective for third-party payers. A quadrivalent flu vaccine was administered in Italy in 2018/19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X19310643  Flu vaccines use canine kidney cells “The vaccine was produced by Novartis through culturing of the Madin-Darby canine kidney cell line. Specifically, Flucelvax targets four Influenza sub-types which includes Influenza A subtype H1N1, Influenza A subtype H3N2, and two Influenza B viruses.”  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell-based_vaccine    Canine enteric coronavirus (CCoV) is a common infection of dogs. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4147700/  Again, I don’t have the background to adequately assess all of these claims, but they appear to be true.
18. Bias against HCQ — evidence we have assessed through our notes supports this claim.
19. A Pentagon study showed people with a flu vaccine are 36% more likely to contract a coronavirus. True, a published study of Department of Defense personnel found: “Examining non-influenza viruses specifically, the odds of both coronavirus and human metapneumovirus in vaccinated individuals were significantly higher when compared to unvaccinated individuals (OR = 1.36 and 1.51, respectively).” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X19313647?via%3Dihub  True to form, when I googled looking for the study, I found cabal/$$$ “fact checkers” saying the results of the aforementioned study was misinformation.
[image of pentagon study search -- top searches saying it was misinformation]
In conclusion, I did not find researchable lies by Mikovitz. She does have a personal bias against Fauci — make up your own mind as to the veracity of the presentation.