16 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-06 1955 PUBLIC

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-06 1955 PUBLIC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sslUvKoV3U&lc=z12if1gb3wmncncc422vwjwxdymmz1xke
https://pastebin.com/kDi3PLq4
__


To all including +BzTruetalk __ No space agency has ever shown *sustained duration genuine micro/zero-gravity* footage that *upon scrutiny* remains free from *glaring glitches,* clever cuts, sneaky edits and *misdirecting pans.*







All long duration footage is necessarily comprised of *briefer sections of genuine zero gravity* that are cleverly stitched together with the unavoidable joins disguised by *"masking glitches".* These masking glitches are made to appear like ordinary "broadcasting glitches" or "satellite glitches". That way "normal people" don't think twice about them and dismiss them as "video compression". (It should not need to be pointed out *that does not mean every glitch represents a join but some of them necessarily do*).







>>> This is why we can be shown hour-long "ISS tours" and thirty minute "ISS interviews" but not ever a mere three minutes of something cool like consecutive somersaults or spinning on the spot or ping-pong. <<<







Notice that interviews with "Scott Kelly" on Earth contain genuine banter between the journalist and "Scott Kelly". But when "Scott Kelly" was aboard the alleged "ISS" all of his interviews were indistinguishable from being pre-recorded. Any "banter" was scripted to give the illusion of being in "real time" such as _"there seems to be a problem with the audio" followed by "that's much better now"_ (What amazing audio technicians "NASA" have! They can diagnose and fix an audio issue so quickly it makes you wonder how there was a problem in the first place!)







If you say that the masking glitches we see are because they are "broadcasting from space" then you will need to explain why the "ISS live feed" is free from these glitches. I have recorded (and thus can prove) tens of consecutive minutes of streamed "ISS" footage that is glitch free (only tens of minutes at a time because the feed is regularly cut for some unknown reason; it cannot be because it is "dark" because I have tens of minutes of night-time video as well).







If you say that the purported live stream is possible without masking glitches because it is low resolution then you would need to explain the HD (high definition) alleged "space walks" which are *broadcast live but do not have the same kind of masking glitches.*







With the purported "space walks" it appears that the signal breaks up every time the camera is moved. That in itself is highly unlikely. Does "NASA" want us to think there is a loose wire?! And besides - I have got hours of HD space walk footage that is *completely free from any glitches.* Oops! How can that be if the purported "ISS interviews" cannot go very long without a glaring glitch or a sneaky edit.







The only criticism is that merchants of disinformation (such as "DITRH", "Russianvids", "Jeranism" etc.) all continue to allege wires, green screen and that the astronauts are hanging upside down. *These are all tempting ideas but ultimately flawed.* After about a year of looking into this issue it appears the artefacts that lead us to suspect those things are all bait and traps to have us chasing dead-ends and half-truths. *All of the zero gravity is genuine* - it is only that the illusion of a permanent zero gravity environment must necessarily be fabricated.







All said and done everyone who believes there is a real and manned "ISS" is doing so on trust. *They want to believe they live in a world that has a real and manned "ISS" rather than a world that more simply lies about having one.*







Those who say, _"But Lesta - there is a bright light in the sky!"_ have not examined the issue. Do they suppose every bright light in the sky has little men and women in them? If not then why do they suppose *that* bright light does?







*Every person who posts an image of the "ISS" with details from Earth is lying* (that includes "Reds Rhetoric" who refused my *reasonable request* for footage of the "ISS with details" *that he personally vouches for as genuine* - he refused because he knows very well *it is all fraudulent*).







Amateur astronomers on astronomy forums lament that they have tried for years to photograph the "ISS" with details *but failed.* Yet we have *outright amateurs* like "Reds Rhetoric" achieve wonderful "success" on their first go. How can it be? Is it a miracle?! No - the answer is much simpler and pedestrian. *When something is very difficult to do for real but very easy to fake with CGI then we must suspect and somehow rule out CGI.*







All "ISS advocates" admit that there exists fake "ISS" images and footage but none of them can explain how they discern between which footage/images are real and which are not. Naturally enough I suggest *it is all fake.* It is interesting that people like "Jeff C" and "Bztruetalk" will often talk about "Occam's Razor" when it is convenient but they forget all about it when it doesn't work in their favour. When something is very difficult to do for real but very easy to fake with CGI then what does "Occam's Razor" suggest?!







Some time before "Reds Rhetoric" posted his purported "ISS" footage he said to his audience that he didn't know anything about CGI. Was an egotistical pr!ck sharing with his audience some personal limitation of his (hahaha as if) or was it more simply a decoy for what was to come? Thus evidence for premeditation. _I think you know my answer._







If the alleged "ISS" is real and manned *then why do so many people have to lie about it?* Let's not forget the loser "Andrew Winnard" (aka "Andrew Losehard") whom I caught out in this video: watch?v=a4898fr4XP4







Everything "Jeff C" ("NWA" / "New World Agenda") has had to say about the "ISS" - especially recently with the alleged "André Kuipers" tour is a misrepresentation and under-exaggeration. Such as his insistence that only one hard cut was used when clearly there were at least two (with the second cut being very bizarre). "Jeff C" fails to mention that a *misdirecting pan* is as good as a hard cut anyway since if no person is on the screen then any amount of time could conceivably pass.







I could go and on *and usually I do* - but I have written enough. If anyone is curious then search my channel for the word "ISS" to see my videos on it. I have looked at this issue for about a year and I have explored practically every possibility. I have changed my views on this topic (I have gone from considering "green screen" and "water tanks" to accepting that it is all genuine zero gravity but cleverly stitched together).







The alleged "ISS" is the most important issue in the so-called "truth community". It is the one claim that proves the lie system. *I am currently working on a substantial video that explains this and deals with every major objection and claim that "ISS advocates" make.*




__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w