22 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-26 1430 +nationalparksign

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-26 1430 +nationalparksign
https://plus.google.com/u/0/108131621397475586556/posts/3BivveyvMky
https://pastebin.com/k4NUe5pu
__

+nationalparksign __ Remember that the most effective way to convince someone of something is to have that person come up with the idea for themselves. By associating "animals and humans" (as being on the same level) - it is going to cause thoughts and ideas to rise up within the person.

But because it is not explicit - the ideas and thoughts will feel self-originated.

In Australia there seems to be a huge push to have children be the next "idea generators". Everything is about "coming up with ideas" and "solving problems".

That is explicit. So I see it working like this:

1. Children are outright told "hey - come up with ideas that improve the world!"

But what ideas?

2. The children (who become adults) then get ideas which they have been encouraged to turn into realities.

But the ideas - which feel self-originated - *did not come from within!* They had been engineered and manipulated into having the ideas (which they then know to pursue because that's openly encouraged).

By doing things in this way the "enemy" remains invisible. You can never point the person out. And with each person - it feels like an internal choice.

This is where +Terran Downvale comes in. (He can *read* the *many hints* and *connections* that make this happen.)

To do things in this way requires *many hints* and *many repetitions of hints* onto the population - literally *soaking them in hints and suggestions* so that *enough of them* will become absorbed and get the "target idea" and be in a position to "turn it into reality".

This is the *lie system at work*.

__

Suppose I want people to build pyramids. I could catch a whole lot of people, enslave them and force them to build pyramids.

Or - I could show drawings and images of pyramids and if the population found them "cool" and "wanted them" - then they might organise and build them.

*OR* I can influence the population so that it gets the idea to build pyramids for itself. Because it seems to have "come from within" the population is focused, determined, obsessive and WANTS it to happen.

Which of these three possible ways to build pyramids will be more successful?

The third way is surely the superior method - but it would require a large population of people being routinely exposed to the same hints and suggestions.

What the "normal person" think of as "globalisation" is really just "damage control" (or a "corruption") of everyone being exposed to the *same kinds of hints and suggestions* so that eventually the ideas "arise" and become transformed into reality.

__

The human mind is like a magic seed that can grow to become anything (an analogy for the so-called "stem cell").

Our farmers are "sowing seeds" and giving the right "conditions and nutrients" to grow "ideas" that turn into "physical manifestations". (Because that's what our farmers do!)

__

The lie system is a framework that makes these outcomes possible.

If you lock people up - they think about escaping. If you give people the idea to lock themselves up - they will never think to escape!

______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.