07:11 <[redacted]> what should be the options for the non-commercial file sharing survey ?
07:12 < robbrit> "Do you support non-commercial file-sharing when it is not wanted by the content creator?" => Yes/No
07:12 <[redacted]> then you'll get everyone to say yes
07:13 < robbrit> how should it be phrased?
07:14 <[redacted]> What should the pirate party of canada propose in regards to non-commercial file-sharing:
07:14 <[redacted]> then we let them pick one
07:14 <[redacted]> or we can even have people rank the options in order of preference
07:14 < robbrit> ahh ok, i gotcha
07:15 <[redacted]> the options as I seem them for now are
07:15 <[redacted]> 1. Abolish copyright entirely
07:15 < robbrit> one should be "100% supported and encouraged non-commercial file-sharing, à la the swedish party"
07:15 <[redacted]> yeah that's #2
07:15 < robbrit> which is not the same as the one you put
07:15 < robbrit> yep
07:15 <[redacted]> 3. Levy
07:16 <[redacted]> 4. Reduction of penalties for non-commercial to 3* fair market value, no changes to faciliate finding out who the infringers out, and strenghtening the right to privacy
07:17 < robbrit> maybe not put 3*fair market value
07:17 <[redacted]> what should I put?
07:17 < robbrit> make it a bit more adjustable, like "something close to fair market value"
[...]
10:00 <@JakeDaynes> Im pro-#4