API tools faq
paste
Lesta

14 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-15 1930 +Je Suis Ce Que Je Suis

Lesta
Mar 15th, 2016
79
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 9.98 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-15 1930 +Je Suis Ce Que Je Suis
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2N6KwFPEn0&lc=z13jurcbdr3ax3j1c22pwns5dozxy1eb504
  3. https://pastebin.com/jZwZnhYv
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +Je Suis Ce Que Je Suis __ What follows will be some notes. Hopefully they will relate in some way to what you have written! (Though it may end up adding to the confusion.) The first caption mentions that the lie system is a framework to impart/impress beliefs upon us (the farmed population) for false reasons. *By "false reasons" I do not mean "outright provable lies".* That won't be the case. *Though having said that it CAN mean lies and for some things they will necessarily be lies.* But they won't be outright *provable* lies. The lie system is "in place" to have us believe lies if that is needed, necessary or desired (or simply to test that the lie system is working and effective). *And "normal people" WILL believe them because they have been trained from birth to believe them.* (But we will never be able to point and say "that is a lie because of X" - because X would represent a "self-evident truth" and the lie system does not make any effort to have us believe as true provably false things such as 2+2=5 [which is an off-the-cuff and possibly flawed example but you get the point].)
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13. Any justification for a belief that doesn't consist of "sufficient proof" *is* a false reason. When we "trust" an "expert" what we are doing is trusting that the expert has *on our behalf* seen "sufficient proof" and has not been mistaken and is not abusing our trust. It might take a moment for that to "sink in".
  14.  
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19. For example: let us suppose the Earth is indeed round. In simple terms sufficient proof for a "round Earth" is two-fold and requires either: 1) being far enough away from the ground so as to observe the entirety of the Earth's shape at once and/or 2) a camera being positioned far enough away from the ground so as to take a photo of the entirety of the Earth's shape at once. Or - _if we don't feel like being pedantic_ - far enough away so as to capture definite "curvature" so that we may know the Earth at least isn't flat; if we observe curvature then we can assume the Earth is "round".
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23.  
  24.  
  25. Obviously none of us have personally been far enough away from the ground to see the entirety of the Earth's shape. Nor have you or I sent up a camera in our place. And so we must *trust* that so-called "astronauts" (such as "Neil Armstrong" and "Buzz Aldrin" and even those aboard the alleged "ISS") are: 1) where they claim to be and 2) reporting to us the truth and are not themselves somehow mistaken. *For "normal people" that is all they need to hear.*
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. Simply, "normal people" trust "astronauts" (and think rather highly of them). They defer the belief's justification to the "expert" - an "astronaut". And maybe that is okay. *But our personal belief is not justified.* _And that is what matters and that is the problem._ Because our justification lacks sufficient proof the lie system can have us believe any falsehood it wants because it never has to give us sufficient proof! (And - _this is the point_ - a falsehood can never be justified with sufficient proof because if it could *it wouldn't be a falsehood!*)
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37. The second component is "accepting [or mistaking] proof's appearances for proof". This is a significant problem and "normal people" seem oblivious to it. With regard to the shape of the Earth - it means scrutinising purported "photographs" taken far away from the Earth's surface. *But what we see with that is always indistinguishable from CGI.* If something is indistinguishable from CGI then it cannot count. I could show you a CGI render of a yeti - that does not mean yetis are real! If it worked that way then people would busy themselves rendering CGI money to pay for things.
  38.  
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43. If you Google for images of "Earth from space" you see only CGI-looking images. If a person accepts any of those visual representations as "proof" then - _once again_ - they have accepted *proof's appearances* for proof. They are *trusting* the provider of that image (visual representation). That may be okay but our so-called "governments" are associated with the same groups of people who had us believe that atomic bombs were dropped on Japanese children. Hardly trustworthy folk! (What it all means is that people have beliefs and opinions about a vast number of things they have no business having opinions or beliefs about!)
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47.  
  48.  
  49. Any belief that lacks sufficient proof and is being "justified" on trust (e.g., an "expert") or proof's appearances (e.g., a "CGI image of a real thing") is a belief that has been accepted for *false reasons.* That is what I mean by *"false reasons"* - not "outright provable lies". While I am at it: *I call this kind of belief a "shadow belief"* but that is for another ramble. A shadow belief MAY be true ("true things for false reasons"). And that is what opens us up to accepting outright lies and falsehoods as truth (that come to us by way of "charming scumbags").
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55. In order to get us to accept outright lies it is necessary to as much as possible never give us sufficient proof for anything. Note: for some things there WILL be sufficient proof and SOME people will have access to it - just not "normal people". Anything which can be figured out for ourselves is considered a "self-evident truth" and is off limits to the lie system. The lie system will not lie about "self-evident truths" (this helps to ensure the lie system is not "caught" or even "discovered"/"found out" by "normal people").
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61. Beyond that - when our beliefs are founded and formed on trust and accepting/mistaking proof's appearances (for proof) *then we will end up believing anything we are told* (by the "charming scumbags" which the lie system has a monopoly on). >>> *A person will believe anything at all UP TO what they can imagine is possible.* <<< But not everyone is at the same "belief point". Some people believe X whereas others do not. *The lie system keeps itself within the "majority view"* [the "prevailing culture's beliefs]. *Or what as individuals we believe the majority believes* - that is an important distinction but is for a different ramble.
  62.  
  63.  
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67. And so before we are told about manned journeys to Mars *the population must first accept and believe that there are space stations orbiting the Earth* etc. Keep in mind that *even if there really are manned journeys to Mars - the population won't believe it if the population does not also accept all of the preliminary steps!* (Such as orbiting space stations.)
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71.  
  72.  
  73. The only thing that necessarily proves there are real *and manned* "space stations" is to see sustained duration genuine zero gravity that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans. *Even if there are real and manned space stations that is the only thing ["sufficient proof"] that justifies our belief in it.* Without having seen such footage (and no one has) then a person's belief that there is a real and manned "ISS" is (_everyone sing along with me_) *founded and formed on trust and accepting/mistaking proof's appearances for proof.*
  74.  
  75.  
  76.  
  77.  
  78.  
  79. In simple terms: the person believes something because they can imagine it is possible and - _as is often the case_ - the person *wants* to believe it is true. They *want* to believe they live in a world which has a real and manned "ISS" and not in a world that more simply lies about one. "Normal people" have what I call a "fetish for reality-based fantasy" - they won't believe in "aliens" or "yetis" [even though it's potentially possible] but they lap up "space stations" - because it's all so very realistic and plausible! To illustrate that: if you show a "normal person" a good quality photograph of what appears to be "Bigfoot" they will not believe it. But if you show them a photo of a f_kcing moth on an angle that looks a little bit like the "International Space Station" and tell them it's the "ISS" they will not even question it! (Because it's "possible!")
  80.  
  81.  
  82.  
  83.  
  84.  
  85. The lie system is especially pernicious when it comes to TRUE beliefs. Because we are RIGHT (it's "true" after all!) but we are right *for the WRONG REASONS!* And believing something that is true for the wrong reasons *is no better than believing something false for any reason.* (And again - this whole system sets us up to accepting and believing whatever we are told. That some things we are told happen to be true is just icing!)
  86.  
  87.  
  88.  
  89.  
  90.  
  91. The usefulness of something can be determined by its predictive power. If something has no predictive power then really it is useless. *In a lie system we can expect images of the Earth from space to be indistinguishable from CGI - _and that is what we get._* In a lie system we can expect to see footage from an "ISS" but it will always be cut to pieces or somehow at all times doubtable to intelligent people.
  92.  
  93.  
  94.  
  95.  
  96.  
  97. At all times - as much as possible - it comes down to what a person *can believe is possible* and their own personal bias. And then - _of course_ - "normal people" surround themselves with other "normal people" and become very entrenched and unable to see the psychological abuse that is happening to them. (What is happening to them - _and us_ - is that they are being farmed and denied the truth about their situation; which is that we are in a lie system which is a system within a system - the containing system is the "universe" and the universe functions like a dream - but all of that is also for a different ramble!)
  98.  
  99.  
  100.  
  101. __________________________________________
  102. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  103. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  104.  
  105. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  106. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  107.  
  108. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  109. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  110.  
  111. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  112. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!