The Liberalists

To Sargon;

   Re: The creation of an amorphous, ambiguous, international, socio-political grassroots activism movement, VS. A still-being-defined ideology bundled into simply one more "ism", that sounds almost identical to another, well-established, "ism". In fact, it's the same one that has been very successfully co-opted by our ideological enemy, the Left Wing Globalist Collective, aka, the Democrats.


  If you want to be effective, look at /pol/, 4chan, 8chan, Anonymous. These are very ambiguous names of groups, places and non-specific entities that are fairly inhospitable to those unversed in Chan culture. Likewise with the Alt-Right, no one can agree on a definition. Many who don't think themselves Alt-Right find themselves being lumped in with them by the enemies of the Alt-Right. Similarly, "Skeptics" was always an ill-defined name that had many people who found enough agreement with the broader consensus of the "community", disavowing the term "Skeptic" faster than Peter could disavow Jesus. When the Alt-Right consists of everyone and no one, it's like shooting at a swarm of bees. And like a swarm of bees, you can't aim them precisely, but you can point them in a general direction and let them go. On the flip-side, we're already seeing drone swarm attacks in Syria. Why not adopt swarm tactics to our online political activism.


  I think that is a key point in what makes /pol/ and Anonymous as effective as they have been in the Culture War. It also highlights the increased strength of 'Voluntary Individualist Collectives' over the Neo-Marxist 'Involuntary Collectives' that prioritize immutable traits uberalus. These tactics, distilled and refined, can prove devastatingly effective in the next round of elections.

   Ambiguous naming also voids the need for a rigorous CYA disavowal policy/procedure. Which would otherwise be necessary as opponent provacatours would infiltrate the "Liberalist" community with the intent of subverting, co-opting or sabotaging it. This would be one benefit of having Sargon as a figurehead. Any attempt of outside fuckery would be apparent once they moved on Don Sargon. On the flip-side, it risks turning this movement into a cult of personality hugbox. And hey, if SuperSaiyanSargonism can defeat the Islamists, I can live with that.

   I see some similarity here with the Nazi larpers on /pol/, and Communists as well, who want to undergo a rebranding campaign for "National Socialism" or "Traditionists Workers Party", or the "Hammer & Scycle". The energy you'll spend trying to rebrand "Liberalist & Liberalism" will only syphon energy from the actual issues. And rebranding "Liberalism" in America is simply a non-starter. Perhaps a Liberalist Party in the UK would be the proper application of the term and impetus behind it.

   I get that you say, "Get over it", but how many hours are we supposed to waste having how many pointless arguments over a fucking name? I'ld rather spend my time tweeting inconvientent realities to UK coppers everytime they piss and moan about 'Hate Speech', because they can't fuck with Americans (legally), than trying to convince some half braindead Norman of the REAL meaning of Liberalism, or being a Liberalist, or Liberalistocracy?

   I remember in Angel, season 4 (Still better than Buffy), Angel defeated the Big Bad, a super powerful Being from a higher dimension, by retrieving and releasing the name of said Being. At the time, I thought it was retarded. But having listened to Don Sargon's smooth & sexy literation of "The Art of War" more times than I can masturbate to, I remember the bit about knowing your enemy being key to defeating them. Well, the first step in knowing your enemy is identifying them. Naming them. So with this in mind, using an ambiguous identity that doesn't easily lend itself to the type of pigeon-holing and religation into obscurity that we saw we both the Occupy Wall St. and Tea Party movements, will better serve this movement than "Liberalist", or really any other annoying "ism" and "ist".

   Sargon, if you keep harping on principles, you're going to start sounding like Glenn Beck. Never Go Full Beck! Mix it up a little. http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/principles

   Also, can you please elaborate on how you don't think the white race is currently in terminal decline in terms of aging populations and long-term below replacement level birthrates in many Euro nations? If corrective action isn't take, preferably in the form of a resurgence in the Quiverful Movement...well, go watch, "Children of Men" and tell me how far away that future feels living in the current year.

   Likewise, here is a sampling of eye-catching Movement Monikers that'll inspire 'WTF' looks from Normies and Politicos alike:

SpoonClank Nation! Styxtater For Life!

Cooperative Nationism/ists

Mutual Symbiotic Nationalism/ists

Progressive Radical Pasificism/ists

Idiocratic Republican Utopianism/ists

OmniSexual Pan-Racialist PreCogs

Radical Stoic Centrism/ists

Rule By The 'Golden Rule'

Esoteric Neo-Collectivism/ists

The Cringocracy or The Cringocity & Cringocrats

FeminIslamoXenoBigoPhobaCismIsts - 1 Word

The New 1776er's

"...the Aristocrats!"

Neo-Theocratic Opportunism/ists

Entangled Sociology Pathologists

Permissive Abolitionism/ists

The Artisan Autists

"The Party After The Illuminate"

Bob Villa's "This Old New World Order"

MultiCultural Social Credit Score Warriors

The Pleiadian "Earth or Bust" Envoy

Post-CurrentYearism/ists

Pre-Post-Scarcity Eco-Stalinism/ists

Super-Califragilistic-Expealadoshism/ists

Skitzophrenic Skepticists

Transformational Traditionalism/ists

The Doge Army

GrassRoot GrubWorms

UberEthicoLiberoFascistoizm/izts