Advertisement
foongus

Untitled

May 18th, 2020
922
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 17.64 KB | None | 0 0
  1. [10-May-20 12:39 AM] Luthier#1578
  2. ok if we're discussing the current meta then i think we need to suspect 2 things:
  3.  
  4. [10-May-20 12:39 AM] Luthier#1578
  5. diglett and then heat rock or bulba (not so sure about bulba cuz some people find viability for it outside of sun, which i dont want to kill in the process of suspect)
  6.  
  7. [10-May-20 12:40 AM] Luthier#1578
  8. if we were to do so, idk how this timeline would fit
  9.  
  10. [10-May-20 12:40 AM] Luthier#1578
  11. i get that ideally its not fair to do so but
  12.  
  13. [10-May-20 12:41 AM] Luthier#1578
  14. realistically will it work out? im not quit sure. ill leave that up to the thoughts of those w more experience than me cuz out of everyone in this chat i am the one with by far the least in tiering experience cuz ive been here the shortest amount of time
  15.  
  16. [10-May-20 09:25 AM] starmaster#8286
  17. nah
  18.  
  19. [10-May-20 09:25 AM] starmaster#8286
  20. anyway who says they have viability for bulba outside sun
  21.  
  22. [10-May-20 09:25 AM] starmaster#8286
  23. is fucking lying
  24.  
  25. [10-May-20 09:25 AM] starmaster#8286
  26. what would u EVER use bulba for that can't be handled by
  27.  
  28. [10-May-20 09:25 AM] starmaster#8286
  29. oddish or budew
  30.  
  31. [10-May-20 09:26 AM] starmaster#8286
  32. I suggested heat rock a while ago and I'd still be down for that
  33.  
  34. [10-May-20 09:27 AM] Ninja#8225
  35. im down for heat rock too
  36.  
  37. [10-May-20 10:50 AM] Coconut#8762
  38. heat rock is preferred
  39.  
  40. [10-May-20 10:55 AM] LilyAC#7887
  41. freeing vulpix to ban bulba and cherry still makes the most sense to me
  42.  
  43. [10-May-20 11:05 AM] Coconut#8762
  44. would rather nerf all three (heat rock) than ban any one mon
  45.  
  46. [10-May-20 11:16 AM] BurntZebra#8147
  47. Would vulpix get retested if heat rock was banned
  48.  
  49. [10-May-20 11:18 AM] Coconut#8762
  50. potentially
  51.  
  52. [10-May-20 11:26 AM] levi#6206
  53. There isn't a chance that banning heat rock would make autosun balanced
  54.  
  55. [10-May-20 11:27 AM] levi#6206
  56. It would probably make manual sun balanced but I'd still lean banning the mon(s) I think
  57.  
  58. [10-May-20 11:28 AM] Coconut#8762
  59. Well I think the most oppressive thing about sun is the guessing game of moves on a really fast mon
  60.  
  61. [10-May-20 11:28 AM] levi#6206
  62. Banning heat rock negates manual sun the archetype as a whole and reduces it to maybe bulba as a stand-alone sweeper
  63.  
  64. [10-May-20 11:28 AM] Coconut#8762
  65. Vulpix + Bulba is still powerful without heat rock
  66.  
  67. [10-May-20 11:28 AM] Serene Grace#5243
  68. id ban bulbasaur
  69.  
  70. [10-May-20 11:28 AM] Coconut#8762
  71. but certainly can't accomplish what it can now
  72.  
  73. [10-May-20 11:28 AM] levi#6206
  74. Banning bulba just gets rid of standalone sun bulba which is mediocre and sunless bulba which is unviable
  75.  
  76. [10-May-20 11:29 AM] levi#6206
  77. Vulpix + bulba is dumb bc vulpix can still set permasun w boots
  78.  
  79. [10-May-20 11:29 AM] levi#6206
  80. It's not going to be balanced w or w.o heat rock
  81.  
  82. [10-May-20 11:29 AM] Coconut#8762
  83. yeah ponyta + bulba + standard 4 is nuked
  84.  
  85. [10-May-20 11:29 AM] Coconut#8762
  86. if we ban bulba
  87.  
  88. [10-May-20 11:29 AM] LilyAC#7887
  89. arent we supposed to avoid weird bans like items
  90.  
  91. [10-May-20 11:29 AM] levi#6206
  92. Let alone dual chloro
  93.  
  94. [10-May-20 11:30 AM] Coconut#8762
  95. Complex bans
  96.  
  97. [10-May-20 11:30 AM] Coconut#8762
  98. are what we're supposed to avoid
  99.  
  100. [10-May-20 11:30 AM] Coconut#8762
  101. banning heat rock is the equivalent of banning gengarnite.
  102.  
  103. [10-May-20 11:30 AM] levi#6206
  104. If we want to even consider freeing vulpix then banning bulba is 100% the play, banning heat rock won't help
  105.  
  106. [10-May-20 11:31 AM] levi#6206
  107. Though I'm not sure if vulp ponys gonna be busted anyways
  108.  
  109. [10-May-20 11:31 AM] levi#6206
  110. So idk if that's relevant
  111.  
  112. [10-May-20 11:31 AM] Coconut#8762
  113. freeing vulpix shouldn't be the primary priority
  114.  
  115. [10-May-20 11:31 AM] Serene Grace#5243
  116. banning heat rock is not the equivalent of banning gengarnite
  117.  
  118. [10-May-20 11:31 AM] levi#6206
  119. Gengarite was seen as a mon ya
  120.  
  121. [10-May-20 11:31 AM] Coconut#8762
  122. in terms that they're both items
  123.  
  124. [10-May-20 11:31 AM] Coconut#8762
  125. well I mean
  126.  
  127. [10-May-20 11:31 AM] levi#6206
  128. Though we have precedent banning heat rock so we're fine anyways I think
  129.  
  130. [10-May-20 11:31 AM] Coconut#8762
  131. in this case is that much different
  132.  
  133. [10-May-20 11:31 AM] levi#6206
  134. Nah like
  135.  
  136. [10-May-20 11:32 AM] Coconut#8762
  137. who's using cherubi
  138.  
  139. [10-May-20 11:32 AM] levi#6206
  140. There was a pr discussion and it was decided that megas are separate forms ie mons
  141.  
  142. [10-May-20 11:33 AM] Serene Grace#5243
  143. https://www.smogon.com/forums/threads/prefer-banning-pok%C3%A9mon-instead-of-banning-abilities-moves-etc.3656550/
  144. My views are basically what zarel posted here
  145.  
  146. {Embed}
  147. https://www.smogon.com/forums/threads/prefer-banning-pok%C3%A9mon-instead-of-banning-abilities-moves-etc.3656550/
  148. Prefer banning Pokémon instead of banning abilities/moves/etc
  149. I've pushed this before, but in light of the recent Shadow Tag ban, I want to try again.
  150.  
  151.  
  152.  
  153.  
  154.  
  155. I think it's better to ban Pokémon than to ban anything else.
  156.  
  157. I have a lot of reasons, so let me go through a few of the biggest ones.
  158.  
  159. 1. This is literally what the tier system is f...
  160. https://www.smogon.com/forums/media/twitter.png
  161.  
  162. [10-May-20 11:33 AM] levi#6206
  163. We have other tiers banning heat rock and drought anyways tho
  164.  
  165. [10-May-20 11:34 AM] Coconut#8762
  166. from Zarel:
  167.  
  168. [10-May-20 11:34 AM] Coconut#8762
  169. The thing I'm going for is definitely, if an ability is available on a lot of Pokémon and broken for reasons not obviously "this Pokémon is too strong", I'm a fan of banning it.
  170.  
  171. Things I think are good bans:
  172. - Baton Pass
  173. - Shadow Tag
  174. - Sand Veil
  175. - Moody
  176. - Evasion Clause
  177.  
  178. Things I think should have just banned the Pokémon:
  179. - Drought, Drizzle
  180. - Sand Rush
  181.  
  182. Basically, if it's serious enough to deserve the word "Clause" added after it, it's fine being a ban.
  183.  
  184. [10-May-20 11:35 AM] Coconut#8762
  185. I think this post is more towards avoiding the banning of an ability
  186.  
  187. [10-May-20 11:35 AM] Coconut#8762
  188. rather than a Pokemon or item
  189.  
  190. [10-May-20 11:35 AM] levi#6206
  191. It's the same idea
  192.  
  193. [10-May-20 11:35 AM] levi#6206
  194. Every simple non mon trait
  195.  
  196. [10-May-20 11:35 AM] LilyAC#7887
  197. i agree w zarel's post and think it applies exactly the same to banning pokemon vs banning an item
  198.  
  199. [10-May-20 11:36 AM] Coconut#8762
  200. This post suggests we should avoid banning Chloro at all costs
  201.  
  202. [10-May-20 11:36 AM] levi#6206
  203. I don't agree, I think minimizing collateral should be the second biggest prio after maintaining simple bans
  204.  
  205. [10-May-20 11:36 AM] Coconut#8762
  206. and uses that it fucks up other tiers as collateral
  207.  
  208. [10-May-20 11:36 AM] Coconut#8762
  209. neither of which is what is currently being proposed
  210.  
  211. [10-May-20 11:36 AM] levi#6206
  212. Which is what smogon has done for like have the cases
  213.  
  214. [10-May-20 11:36 AM] levi#6206
  215. And followed zarels philosophy for the other half
  216.  
  217. [10-May-20 11:37 AM] levi#6206
  218. Esp for lc where other tiers aren't a concern at all
  219.  
  220. [10-May-20 11:37 AM] levi#6206
  221. Collateral is arguably more if we ban heat rock here tho imo
  222.  
  223. [10-May-20 11:38 AM] Coconut#8762
  224. Then if we're following that post
  225.  
  226. [10-May-20 11:38 AM] Coconut#8762
  227. We're debating if banning bulba nerfs sun to the point that we're comfortable with
  228.  
  229. [10-May-20 11:39 AM] LilyAC#7887
  230. theres no doubt about that is there?
  231.  
  232. [10-May-20 11:39 AM] Coconut#8762
  233. If Yes, ban Bulbasaur
  234. If No, ban Heat Rock
  235.  
  236. [10-May-20 11:39 AM] Coconut#8762
  237. Following Levi's train of logic
  238.  
  239. [10-May-20 11:39 AM] levi#6206
  240. We don't have to follow that post bc a. the downsides don't apply to us, b. the other tiers don't rlly follow it either
  241.  
  242. [10-May-20 11:39 AM] levi#6206
  243. Huh
  244.  
  245. [10-May-20 11:39 AM] Coconut#8762
  246. all that post says is that
  247.  
  248. [10-May-20 11:39 AM] Coconut#8762
  249. zarel doesn't want to ban abilities
  250.  
  251. [10-May-20 11:40 AM] levi#6206
  252. Of course banning either bulba or heat rock nerfs bulba manual sun archetypes enough
  253.  
  254. [10-May-20 11:40 AM] levi#6206
  255. I'm just talking abt what else gets impacted
  256.  
  257. [10-May-20 11:40 AM] Coconut#8762
  258. is banning bulbasaur too much of a hit to sun?
  259.  
  260. [10-May-20 11:40 AM] levi#6206
  261. Also zarels post applies to all non Pokémon stuff I'm p sure
  262.  
  263. [10-May-20 11:40 AM] LilyAC#7887
  264. i mean the title of the thread itself already says more than that coco
  265.  
  266. [10-May-20 11:40 AM] levi#6206
  267. So moves abilities items
  268.  
  269. [10-May-20 11:41 AM] Coconut#8762
  270. See but the concern with that doesn't apply to us otherwise
  271.  
  272. [10-May-20 11:41 AM] Coconut#8762
  273. because the main reason that we wouldn't ban heat rock
  274.  
  275. [10-May-20 11:41 AM] Coconut#8762
  276. would be that LC UU can't use heat rock either then
  277.  
  278. [10-May-20 11:41 AM] Coconut#8762
  279. Which is pointless
  280.  
  281. [10-May-20 11:42 AM] LilyAC#7887
  282. thats just one of the reasons
  283.  
  284. [10-May-20 11:42 AM] levi#6206
  285. The post applies to us technically in that it discourages item bans but its listed downsides don't rlly impact us
  286.  
  287. [10-May-20 11:42 AM] levi#6206
  288. And it's not official policy, in fact other tiers don't follow it either often
  289.  
  290. [10-May-20 11:42 AM] Coconut#8762
  291. The downsides don't affect us at all, and other tiers have went along and done what they've wanted
  292.  
  293. [10-May-20 11:42 AM] levi#6206
  294. Ya
  295.  
  296. [10-May-20 11:42 AM] levi#6206
  297. I still think banning bulbas better tho
  298.  
  299. [10-May-20 11:43 AM] Coconut#8762
  300. So the only thing that I'm gaining from that post
  301.  
  302. [10-May-20 11:43 AM] levi#6206
  303. Independently of policy concerns
  304.  
  305. [10-May-20 11:43 AM] Coconut#8762
  306. is that Zarel would prefer if we didn't ban an ability because it can't be shown in the builder.
  307.  
  308. [10-May-20 11:44 AM] LilyAC#7887
  309. not just abilities, also moves etc.
  310.  
  311. [10-May-20 11:44 AM] Coconut#8762
  312. Which btw is stupid
  313.  
  314. [10-May-20 11:44 AM] LilyAC#7887
  315. but yea i think thats a good reason
  316.  
  317. [10-May-20 11:44 AM] Coconut#8762
  318. because it could absolutely be shown in the builder
  319.  
  320. [10-May-20 11:44 AM] Coconut#8762
  321. it's just lots of hard work and not fun to maintain.
  322.  
  323. [10-May-20 11:44 AM] Coconut#8762
  324. which is 100% understandable
  325.  
  326. [10-May-20 11:46 AM] Coconut#8762
  327. for example, moves that aren't available on mons in VGC don't show up anymore
  328.  
  329. [10-May-20 11:46 AM] Coconut#8762
  330. if we wanted to ban weather ball specifically, we could have it show up but have it filed as banned or have it not appear at all
  331.  
  332. [10-May-20 11:47 AM] LilyAC#7887
  333. a heat rock ban isnt immediately apparent to a new user
  334.  
  335. [10-May-20 11:47 AM] Coconut#8762
  336. if it has the word illegal next to it
  337.  
  338. [10-May-20 11:47 AM] Coconut#8762
  339. when you search for it
  340.  
  341. [10-May-20 11:47 AM] Coconut#8762
  342. how does it make it different from sneasel
  343.  
  344. [10-May-20 11:47 AM] LilyAC#7887
  345. no like if they're playing lc and their opp sets sunny day for all they know it could last 8 turns
  346.  
  347. [10-May-20 11:48 AM] Coconut#8762
  348. I mean
  349.  
  350. [10-May-20 11:48 AM] Coconut#8762
  351. Sure?
  352.  
  353. [10-May-20 11:48 AM] Coconut#8762
  354. But they could change that to be cart accurate too
  355.  
  356. [10-May-20 11:49 AM] Coconut#8762
  357. Which would just display how many turns of sun have been up
  358.  
  359. [10-May-20 11:49 AM] LilyAC#7887
  360. why would that help anyway
  361.  
  362. [10-May-20 11:50 AM] Coconut#8762
  363. I see the issue that you're trying to point out now
  364.  
  365. [10-May-20 11:50 AM] Coconut#8762
  366. Yeah, I agree that's not ideal
  367.  
  368. [10-May-20 11:50 AM] Coconut#8762
  369. But there's workarounds to that
  370.  
  371. [10-May-20 11:52 AM] LilyAC#7887
  372. theres no workarounds that are going to happen
  373.  
  374. [10-May-20 11:52 AM] Coconut#8762
  375. Really bad train of logic with something like that
  376.  
  377. [10-May-20 11:52 AM] Coconut#8762
  378. Sure there's no way that could logically happen
  379.  
  380. [10-May-20 11:54 AM] Coconut#8762
  381. but not only could we stop it in the builder, and that there are feasible options that could be done, and resources that people could read, but we're basing tiering decisions off of a hypothetical newbie.
  382.  
  383. [10-May-20 11:56 AM] LilyAC#7887
  384. its a good basis considering everyone that plays the game is a hypothetical newbie at some point
  385.  
  386. [10-May-20 11:57 AM] Coconut#8762
  387. That's not what we cater tiering to though.
  388.  
  389. [10-May-20 11:57 AM] LilyAC#7887
  390. theres no major advantage to banning heat rock that means we should make the ruleset more complicated and less obvious than it needs to be
  391.  
  392. [10-May-20 11:57 AM] Coconut#8762
  393. If we're really bringing new people into this
  394.  
  395. [10-May-20 11:57 AM] Coconut#8762
  396. Do you think they're more likely to want to use Heat Rock or Bulbasaur on their team
  397.  
  398. [10-May-20 11:59 AM] LilyAC#7887
  399. im not saying we should try to please new players
  400.  
  401. [10-May-20 12:00 PM] LilyAC#7887
  402. im not bothered whether they can use their favourite pocket monster or not
  403.  
  404. [10-May-20 12:00 PM] Coconut#8762
  405. Right but if we're making it less confusing for them
  406.  
  407. [10-May-20 12:00 PM] LilyAC#7887
  408. im saying we should make the rules as clear as possible to them
  409.  
  410. [10-May-20 12:01 PM] Coconut#8762
  411. Then it's really no difference if their favorite mon is banned or an item with little tactical purpose outside medium/high level teams
  412.  
  413. [10-May-20 12:03 PM] Coconut#8762
  414. It comes down to Why can't I use Bulbasaur/Sun is up, how much longer (which it could easily just say in the corner instead of saying 5 or 8 turns)
  415.  
  416. [10-May-20 12:04 PM] Coconut#8762
  417. This also wasn't an issue with any other tier that banned an item before
  418.  
  419. [10-May-20 12:07 PM] levi#6206
  420. Well the issue existed in other tiers too (and actually much more issues since they are usage tiers), it just got ignored
  421.  
  422. [10-May-20 12:08 PM] levi#6206
  423. Maybe in favour of minimizing collateral or w.e I'm not sure
  424.  
  425. [10-May-20 12:09 PM] LilyAC#7887
  426. i guess we just disagree, ultimately it comes down to preference
  427.  
  428. [10-May-20 12:09 PM] Coconut#8762
  429. ya
  430.  
  431. [10-May-20 12:10 PM] Coconut#8762
  432. I'm not deadset on Heat Rock
  433.  
  434. [10-May-20 12:10 PM] Coconut#8762
  435. but I think it's the better decision moving forward
  436.  
  437. [10-May-20 12:19 PM] levi#6206
  438. do you think banning bulbasaur has more collateral?
  439.  
  440. [10-May-20 12:23 PM] Coconut#8762
  441. I don't know with 100% certainty that banning bulbasaur removes the issue because we already experienced something similar with cherubi
  442.  
  443. [10-May-20 12:23 PM] Coconut#8762
  444. and it's unlikely that sun + oddish + cherry is broken, but not 100% out of the question in my mind
  445.  
  446. [10-May-20 12:33 PM] levi#6206
  447. Ok so the opposite
  448.  
  449. [10-May-20 12:33 PM] levi#6206
  450. I understand but I strongly disagree
  451.  
  452. [10-May-20 01:12 PM] Shrug#7659
  453. does xing out heat rock reintroduce vulpix is the q
  454.  
  455. [10-May-20 01:15 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  456. Wasn't eject pack vulpix sort of dumb too though
  457.  
  458. [10-May-20 01:21 PM] starmaster#8286
  459. It was good but like
  460.  
  461. [10-May-20 01:21 PM] starmaster#8286
  462. Idt it was broken cuz it wasn't great at actually setting sun
  463.  
  464. [10-May-20 01:21 PM] starmaster#8286
  465. And in that way it's not rly much better than eject pack Salandit lol
  466.  
  467. [10-May-20 01:39 PM] levi#6206
  468. it was massively better than any manual setter could ever be tho
  469.  
  470. [10-May-20 01:39 PM] levi#6206
  471. like idt manual sun and autosun can ever rlly be comparable
  472.  
  473. [10-May-20 01:39 PM] levi#6206
  474. not having to click a move is so huge
  475.  
  476. [10-May-20 01:39 PM] levi#6206
  477. or did u just mean vulp as a standalone threat
  478.  
  479. [10-May-20 01:40 PM] starmaster#8286
  480. well the salandit comparison was as a standalone
  481.  
  482. [10-May-20 01:40 PM] starmaster#8286
  483. but idt eject pack vull is a broken setter either tho
  484.  
  485. [10-May-20 01:40 PM] starmaster#8286
  486. cuz u dont have heat rock
  487.  
  488. [10-May-20 01:40 PM] starmaster#8286
  489. lol
  490.  
  491. [10-May-20 01:42 PM] levi#6206
  492. i think like
  493.  
  494. [10-May-20 01:43 PM] levi#6206
  495. eject pack vulpix and cherry could still potentially be broken
  496.  
  497. [10-May-20 01:43 PM] levi#6206
  498. maybe not in pony meta actually idk
  499.  
  500. [10-May-20 01:43 PM] levi#6206
  501. but theres basically zero chance that manual cherry sun will ever be broken
  502.  
  503. [10-May-20 02:48 PM] Luthier#1578
  504. nah eject pack is not broken
  505.  
  506. [10-May-20 02:49 PM] Luthier#1578
  507. the only real tradeoff between the two is that pix is slightly stronger but doesnt get access to poison and second stab
  508.  
  509. [10-May-20 02:49 PM] Luthier#1578
  510. theyre near the same in that sense
  511.  
  512. [10-May-20 02:49 PM] Luthier#1578
  513. i dont think pix would be broken when using the eject pack set
  514.  
  515. [redacted]
  516.  
  517. [10-May-20 02:50 PM] Luthier#1578
  518. if we ban heat rock
  519.  
  520. [10-May-20 02:51 PM] Luthier#1578
  521. and if we're talking about the sole viability of pix + drought + eject
  522.  
  523. [10-May-20 02:51 PM] Luthier#1578
  524. i still dont think its busted
  525.  
  526. [10-May-20 02:51 PM] Luthier#1578
  527. even with the current trappers
  528.  
  529. [10-May-20 02:51 PM] Luthier#1578
  530. i think the trappers are whats broken, not pix
  531.  
  532. [10-May-20 02:51 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  533. well yeah trappers make the eject pack strat actually usable
  534.  
  535. [10-May-20 02:51 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  536. considering pretty much all fire type switchins get trapped by diglett
  537.  
  538. [10-May-20 02:52 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  539. mareanie, ponyta, onix, munchlax
  540.  
  541. [10-May-20 02:52 PM] Luthier#1578
  542. well munchlax sucks now
  543.  
  544. [10-May-20 02:52 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  545. munchlax has like 100% win rate in lcpl
  546.  
  547. [10-May-20 02:53 PM] Luthier#1578
  548. still think it sucks
  549.  
  550. [10-May-20 02:53 PM] Luthier#1578
  551. its a mu fish
  552.  
  553. [10-May-20 02:53 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  554. maybe
  555.  
  556. [10-May-20 02:53 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  557. i think the argument about knock off and munchlax is a bad argument though
  558.  
  559. [10-May-20 02:53 PM] Luthier#1578
  560. again, i am more likely than not wrong btw
  561.  
  562. [10-May-20 02:53 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  563. considering munchlax was basically an S rank mon when vullaby was around with 70% usage
  564.  
  565. [10-May-20 02:53 PM] Luthier#1578
  566. cuz im not too in touch w ss rn
  567.  
  568. [10-May-20 02:53 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  569. defensively, munchlax is a lot less useful now
  570.  
  571. [10-May-20 02:53 PM] Luthier#1578
  572. ye
  573.  
  574. [10-May-20 02:54 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  575. offensively, its about the same
  576.  
  577. [10-May-20 03:08 PM] levi#6206
  578. eject pix w.o chloro sweepers is deffo balanced
  579.  
  580. [10-May-20 03:09 PM] levi#6206
  581. but i think itd still be iffy w cherry and almost surely outright broken w bublba
  582.  
  583. [10-May-20 03:09 PM] levi#6206
  584. i for sure agree that as a standalone mon eject pack pix isnt broken tho just so we're on the same page
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement