TSA Passenger Screening Scare A Fake, Big Government Buildup

source article:  http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/tsa-jfk-passengers-bypass-security-checkpoint-article-1.2977418

TSA allows Kennedy Airport passengers tow alk through security checkpoint without being screened
BY MOLLY CRANE-NEWMAN, THOMAS TRACY, GRAHAM RAYMAN
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Updated: Tuesday, February
21, 2017, 9:12 AM


No lines. No waiting. And no TSA screeners.

Eleven passengers strolled through a security lane without being screened at Kennedy Airport early Monday after Transportation Security Administration agents left the area unsupervised, law enforcement sources said.

Instead of following protocol and notifying Port Authority cops, it took the TSA two hours to tell police about the frightening breach, the sources add.

The unscreened passengers -- three of whom set off a metal detector -- didn't even have to take off their shoes to get through security, according to a photo of two of the men obtained by the Daily News.

There was no one present to operate the magnetometer and the X-ray machine, or to do pat-downs and secondary screening, the sources said.  (What is wrong with this picture?  That three men walk through a metal detector, setting it off is nothing.  What is disturbing is that there was no one present to even do the primary screening and yet the lines were open.  Why were the terminals open for business without being manned?  Did the TSA let this happen on purpose?)

"It's scary that people could just walk in like that. It's seems like something's out of control here," said Marie Ruiz-Martinez, 40, of Connecticut, who was at the airport to see her niece off to Puerto Rico.  (Strange it is that a woman with a foreign sounding last name should be criticizing the TSA under President Trump.  Not that I like either one, just saying.)

The breach happened just after 6 a.m. at JetBlue's Terminal 5. The use of the numbers six and five here indicate that this is an Illuminati, a.k.a. Club 11, job.  Since the number 65 also makes an appearance, it appears that this security breach was done directly with Jesus Christ in mind, perhaps as a threat to him and his followers.)

Rather than notifying the police, who are specifically trained to handle those situations, the TSA used its own agents to search for the unscreened passengers.  (This makes it seem as though the TSA not only let the breach happen, but that they were aware that the 11 men (Club 11 reference) involved were going to be there at the terminal at that time and were actively participating in the breach.)

"The TSA tried to mitigate the situation by sending their screeners through the terminal in violation of all the protocols," a source said. "The protocol says law enforcement is immediately notified."  (This whistleblower's statement is telling.  It suggests that the TSA knew proper safety protocol regarding such an event and knowingly and willingly did not follow said protocol.  This further confirms the suspicion that the TSA knew about the breach, in advance, and actively played a part in making it happen.)

When they were finally alerted, Port Authority cops flooded the terminal equipped with surveillance photos of the travelers, but none of them could be found, the sources said.  (This was necessary on the TSA's part because they knew that Port Authority cops would have caught the viiolators and arrested them, with the possibility that one or more of them would talk.  This suggests, not definitely, but it suggests that the persons who committed the breach were, in fact, TSA employees, employees that were willing but not comfortable with their job.)

The three people who set off the metal detector all flew to California, a Port Authority official said. Records show there were four JetBlue flights form Terminal 5 scheduled for California between 7 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. -- two to San Francisco and two to Los Angeles.  (If the three people who set off the metal detectors could not be found, how then could this Port Authority official know that they flew to California?  It appears now that my earlier statement of the TSA delaying notifying the Port Authority of the breach for fear of them was partly in error.  This new evidence suggests that at least one Port Authority official was complicit with the Transportation Security Administration in the breach.)

In a statement, the TSA said it was reviewing the incident.

"Early reports indicate three passengers did not receive required secondary screening after alarming the walk-through detector," the agency said.  All personal carry-on bags received required screening."  (?!?  Earlier in this article, we get the impression that the metal detector wasn't even manned.  Now we are told that not only the metal detector, the primary screening checkpoint, was manned when the alarm went off, we are told that the screeners present let the men walk through without performing at least a pat down?!  Furthermore, how does the TSA know what set off the metal detectors?  Part of their statement specifically mentions personal carry-on bags as being the very things (or what they were carrying) that caused the metal detectors to go off.  This could only be done if top TSA officials were directly involved in the planning and execution of the event.)

The Port Authority official said eight of the travelers hadn't been identified by late Monday.

"Port Authority Police are continuing to assist federal authorities in efforts to identify and locate the other eight passengers," the official said.

Julia Talcone, 32, who was at the airport before traveling home to France with her 5-year-old son, said security should be better.

"If it could happen once, maybe it could happen again," Talcone said.

"We're living in dangerous times right now, a lot of things are happening worldwide," she said. "Security should increase."  (Miss Talcone is nothing more than a big-government plant by either the TSA or the Port Authority, and possibly answers to President Trump.)

Gavin Pruett, 20, traveling home to California, was alarmed by the security breach.

"You never know what people are thinking or what their motives are," he said.
"For someone to go unscreened, that's kinda questionable. Especially at JFK."  (Mr. Pruett is another big government plant by either the Port Authority or the TSA.)

"What you have is 11 people, unscreened, who boarded unknown flights to unknown destinations," a law enforcement source said. "This is the failure of the TSA to do its job."  (A contradictory planted statement.  If there are 11 people who boarded unknown flights, how then are at least three of them known to have gone to California?)

Rep. Pete King (R-L.I.) weighed in. "We are looking into it and trying to get more information," he said, "but it is disturbing."  (It sounds like Representative King has profited from this and stands to do so in the future.)

A Port Authority police offical confirmed the TSA's two-hour delay in alerting cops.

"Port Authority Police attempted at approximately 8 a.m. today to locate 11 individuals who went through an unattended TSA PreCheck checkpoint at approximately 6 a.m. at John F. Kennedy International Airport's Terminal 5," the official said. (Multiple references to Club 11 verify the Port Authority's participation in said global government event.)

"Those terminal searches, initiated when a TSA supervisor discovered and alerted Port Authority Police to the lapse, were unsuccessful, and it is believed the travelers in question boarded various flights." The statement did not make clear whether there was anyone at the screening spot to look at the monitors as the bags went through the X-ray machine.  (This is a distraction statement made to try to distract the average citizen from seeing the guilt of the Port Authority and TSA."

The TSA aid it was "confident" the incident represented "no threat to the aviation transportation system."  (Of course it represents no threat, because there never was a threat.  The real threat is that the TSA and Port Authority stand to profit a great deal from bigger government and they want to make sure they get "their fair share.")

"TSA works with a network of security layers both seen and unseen," the statement said. "Once our review is complete, TSA will discipline and retrain the employees as appropriate."  (They have no intention of disciplining anyone, unless it gets out that the TSA is crooked.  Then they will discipline them.)