EricofAZ does not deeply value the teachings of Christ

[20:09] <@EricofAZ> Sally, does any of this rant have anything to do with Christian Debate?
[20:09] * SallyYates pauses
[20:09] == _Serdar_1_ [[email protected]] has quit [Ping timeout]
[20:09] <+SallyYates> EricofAZ: I am currently debating Sara_Ks
[20:10] <+DeckrdR> hm, who is postulating that ChuckWagon ?
[20:10] <+SallyYates> Examplification conclusion: We have rights to protect the sacred rights of people against the less important preferences of others
[20:10] <+DeckrdR> (other than the onvious theocracies)
[20:10] <+DeckrdR> obvious*
[20:10] <@EricofAZ> Sally, that is a fine answer, but not the answer to the question I asked.
[20:10] <+SallyYates> Sara_Ks: John Rawls spoke of a veil of ignorance in his political philosophy
[20:10] <@Sara_Ks> SallyYates Its ok, carry on with EricofAZ, I have to read a jounal yet, then get to work
[20:11] <+SallyYates> Rawls' philosophy is neo-Kantian, that is, it is based off the categorical imperative
[20:11] <@Moshe`> SallyYates your posts are soooo familiar...
[20:11] <@Sara_Ks> Take care all
[20:11] == Sara_Ks [[email protected]] has quit [Quit: I believe]
[20:11] <+DeckrdR> it follows logically that we were created equally, ChuckWagon ?
[20:11] == Mickey52 [[email protected]] has joined #christiandebate
[20:11] <+SallyYates> EricofAZ: I think the most useful way for us to interact is to develop patience
[20:11] == mode/#ChristianDebate [+v Mickey52] by BibleBot
[20:11] <@EricofAZ> Sally, nobody is debating you.  Please take the rant elsewhere.
[20:11] <+DeckrdR> sure ChuckWagon
[20:11] <+DeckrdR> take care
[20:12] <+SallyYates> !niv James1:19
[20:12] <@BibleBot> Jas1:19 My dear brothers, take note of this: Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry, (NIV)
[20:12] <+SallyYates> EricofAZ: It appears the way my mind works irritates your mind
[20:12] <+SallyYates> This is a gift from God for you to practice patience
[20:12] <+SallyYates> (That's the Christian way to say it)
[20:13] <+SallyYates> The Buddhist way to say it: Your mind lacks awareness/mindfulness about all aspects of your existence and my mind reveals that
[20:13] <+SallyYates> My mind presents a good opportunity to practice mindfulness
[20:13] <@EricofAZ> Kinda hard for you to listen when you're posting a rant, eh Sally?
[20:13] <+Peter__> SallyYates, do you think you speak slowly or quickly?
[20:13] <+SallyYates> EricofAZ: Do you value patience?
[20:13] == ChuckWagon [[email protected]] has left #ChristianDebate []
[20:14] <+SallyYates> Peter__: Both.
[20:14] <+Peter__> SallyYates, I only see you speak quickly. I am sure you can speak slowly, I just haven't seen it yet.
[20:14] <+SallyYates> Peter__: I came across a nice essay on Buddhism and sexuality.
[20:14] <+bradmaj> neer found in men? I can out-patient anyone
[20:14] <+SallyYates> I would like to share a portion of it with you.
[20:14] <+SallyYates> I thought it gave a very nice explanation of Buddhist thinking.
[20:15] <+Peter__> SallyYates, do you think thats appropriae to share in a Christian Debate channel?
[20:15] <@Moshe`> bradmaj chuck is confused.... he has the saying back to front
[20:15] <+SallyYates> Peter__: One interpretation of James 1:19 is that speaking slowly is important as a mechanism, like mindful breathing in Buddhism, to promote mindfulness
[20:15] <+SallyYates> I am sufficiently mindful at this speed
[20:15] <+SallyYates> Peter__: Yes
[20:15] <+SallyYates> Multiple religions are discussed in this channel on a recurring basis
[20:15] <+SallyYates> In order: Christianity, Islam, Buddhism
[20:16] <@Moshe`> SallyYates buddhism isn't a conversation piece in this channel
[20:16] <+Peter__> SallyHates, if you want to discuss Buddhism, we can in pm.
[20:16] <+Peter__> SallyYates, do you see how the Ops disagree?
[20:16] <+DeckrdR> buddhism is often discussed here
[20:16] <@Moshe`> SallyYates this is a ChristianDebate channel.. we are not discussing other religions
[20:16] <+Peter__> SallyYates, Buddhism is sometimes discussed here, yes, but looking at the context...is now a good time? Do you think people arund you would be open to it?
[20:16] <+SallyYates> Peter__: The operators are currently angry because their egos were violated. They're seeking 'objective' criteria to ban me to protect their egos
[20:16] <@Moshe`> Peter__ the answer is no
[20:17] <+SallyYates> Peter__: The emotions of other people are their responsibility to manage
[20:17] <@EricofAZ> Sally, LOL