30 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-17 0650 +Turgeon B. Mackafin

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-17 0650 +Turgeon B. Mackafin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OjrR_x25i0&lc=z12bc1ea1rbdgneuh22xuva4orm4sjaiq04
https://pastebin.com/jPhRHS5E
__

+Turgeon B. Mackafin __ That was a *far more encouraging message from you*! It is clear you are an intelligent and thoughtful person and have helped to establish that you're not a troublemaker craving mischief. _Allow me to write a few notes by way of the following words:_







First - let me first define *"sufficient proof"* as *_"that which necessarily proves an event or claim to be true and real"_*.







In a moment I will give you a "real world" example of what would *qualify* as "sufficient proof". In general - if the claim is that _"a plane crashed into a river"_ then it means seeing a plane crash into a river (or a visual representation of it [i.e., "video"] that accurately reflects reality and upon scrutiny cannot be reasonably doubted and remains free from potential editing points). If the claim is that a truck mowed down people then it means seeing a truck mowing down people (or a "video" of it). (In our day-to-day life there are many events which we do not see "sufficient proof" for and are true - _ordinarily that is fine_ - though it is that the absence of sufficient proof is *so common* in our day-to-day life that most people will never notice it is missing for lie system events and claims. I am only mentioning this in passing.)







The absence of "sufficient proof" does not mean a claim is necessarily false (though it could be). It means only that a positive belief (i.e., "a person believes it") about a claim has been founded and formed on *trust* and accepting/mistaking *proof's appearances* for [actual] proof. What this means is that the belief - _*however true it may be*_ - is an "unjustified belief" ("unjustified belief" is a "specialised lie system" term).







On the other hand - when a person has a positive belief (i.e., "a person believes it") about a claim *and has seen* "sufficient proof" - then that person has a "justified belief" (again, a "justified belief" is a "specialised lie system term") and in that case the belief has been founded and formed on *actual proof* _and not proof's appearances._ (This is an _"in a nutshell"_ rundown!)







*An unjustified belief can still be a true belief*. This is important to be mindful of _because *that* is where the *perceptual magic trick* is taking place in each person's mind._







It is only when a person treats an "unjustified belief" as a "justified belief" that there arises an *immense danger*. That person - _for merely doing that_ - has become vulnerable to having his or her beliefs, values, ideals, desires, thoughts, ideas, etc. *wholly manipulated* and it will always seem to that person like a "free choice". Because the result of accepting "unjustified beliefs" as "justified beliefs" is that the person used his/her imagination to fill in the blanks and consequently convinced himself/herself of the event or claim. (What it means to use your imagination to fill in the blanks is beyond the scope of this reply.) The lie system [in part!] can be thought of as a "system that makes possible" for the *professional wholesale manipulation of human perception* - through no more of an effort than that of simple "censorship". (Which is really as easy as keeping swearing and adult themes out of children's television programming.) When a person doesn't know how a magic trick has been done it can create a profound effect and seem like.. magic. But so often once you learn how the trick is being done it becomes profoundly disappointing and unsatisfying. It can also seem absurd to think it continues to work on others!







I assert that when it comes to lie system events and claims "sufficient proof is always withheld" (i.e., "censored"). And this is *proven* by how the "ISS" is presented to the audience (but that is also beyond the scope of this reply). I can give you a recent example of what would *qualify as "sufficient proof"* being presented to the audience (hence *not* an actual lie system event/claim). It was when the French gymnast "broke a leg" quite literally after some poor person had probably told him to go and "break a leg" for good luck. _(This is a placebo planet, after all!)_







Here is where it gets interesting. A lie itself cannot have "sufficient proof"! You cannot "prove" a lie with sufficient proof because otherwise it would not be a lie - _*it would be a truth!*_







This is important because we can now perceive the overall process taking place:







When you present to the audience *true* events _without "sufficient proof"_ what you are really doing is presenting *truth* in the *same form* that a lie would need to take. (And you are training the audience to trust you and become dependent upon you - this process must take place with every new generation/crop of human minds.) When the population has been trained to accept truth in the same form a lie needs to take - *it becomes trained to accept lies when they are presented as truth*. Enough of the population can never recognise when lies are being presented as truth. It just can't know and so it must trust! (If an audience member *trusts* the lie system then he or she becomes *unable to doubt* even the most doubtable of claims such as an alien invasion being reported on the nightly news tomorrow; whereas a person who has lost trust in the lie system [and hasn't figured out the perceptual magic trick] becomes unable to *_resist doubting_* even the most undoubtable of claims - such as yesterday's sports results! By censoring "sufficient proof" the population becomes wholly dependent upon the story tellers - and at all times the audience convinces *itself* of what is true [and not because they *saw* anything that necessarily proved it].)







Each lie system event and claim functions as "training" for the population in this way (again - there is more to this! - I can only give the "in a nutshell" overview). *The "ISS" is critical because it alone can demonstrate the process taking place*. Those seemingly innocuous "glitches" which "normal people" dismiss as "video compression" or "broadcasting glitches" precisely *cripple* what would otherwise *qualify* as "sufficient proof". The mere presence of a single potential editing point means that *you could be* looking at a magic trick _*even if it isn't*_. And so any belief that is formed *is not* being formed on actual proof - _but on proof's appearances._ It instantly becomes an unjustified belief *even though* the person may have otherwise been looking at "sufficient proof"! *The damage gets done*.







This is very subtle and may take a while for its *significance* to really sink in! Through very subtle methods *profound* changes can be caused in the audience's mind.







Rather than write a huge long essay I'll leave it with this. It's a staring point if you wish to understand what I am all about. To understand anything further from me requires a good understanding of the above. If it is not understood - _with its nuances_ - then the other ideas and concepts I rant and rave about are not going to make much sense. I'll just leave it at that and see how it all sits with you. Thank you again for your follow-up - not many would have or could have done that.


______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.