Lesta

2 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-02 0100 +Surfpurzel

Aug 1st, 2016
33
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.88 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-02 0100 +Surfpurzel
  2. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/5fFEGohDY8d
  3. https://pastebin.com/jGDZstJS
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Surfpurzel __ You still have not answered anything - yet I will once again take the time and trouble to answer _your_ questions.
  7.  
  8. I pointed out that by showing his alleged wounds (which *you agree* appeared indistinguishable from skilfully applied makeup) "Rodney Sumter" *was inviting the easily anticipated "hoaxtard" cries of "those wounds are fake!"*
  9.  
  10. Such a predictable response can then be used to portray genuine skeptics and dissidents of the lie system (who are not asserting as a fact about reality that the "wounds" were categorically fake or that the alleged "Orlando Shooting" definitely did not happen) *as people who are harassing alleged "victims"* (whether real or imagined).
  11.  
  12. __
  13.  
  14. In other words what we saw was a very simple tactic - seemingly straight from your very own party-member playbook.
  15.  
  16. __
  17.  
  18. MattyD 4Truth asked for "proof". "Rodney Sumter" then responded with "proof" (this is atypical and you know it) - and if you can be honest, rational and objective then you would admit that what we were shown was *proof of nothing*.
  19.  
  20. It was only "proof" (the appearances of proof) if you already trusted that the event had happened.
  21.  
  22. But MattyD 4Truth clearly did not trust that the event had happened as presented on the nightly news.
  23.  
  24. __
  25.  
  26. For that "wound video" to be *sufficient proof* of wounds it would have required what we saw *to not have any possibility of being faked*.
  27.  
  28. If what we saw could be faked *then why show it in the first place* unless to invite the response of "but that's fake"?!
  29.  
  30. I don't want to accept that you are so stupid that these things haven't also occurred to you.
  31.  
  32. So I wonder - do you somehow view it all differently?
  33.  
  34. __
  35.  
  36. Since you have answered nothing else you can at least answer this:
  37.  
  38. *Do you think that "Rodney Sumter" - by showing his alleged "wounds" to MattyD 4Truth - thought there would be a real possibility MattyD 4Truth would accept them as genuine and apologise and retract everything he had to say about that event?*
  39.  
  40. __
  41.  
  42. I'll simplify it further in case you have trouble understanding my English.
  43.  
  44. *Do you think "Rodney Sumter" thought that by showing his alleged "wounds" in a video that he could change a "hoaxtard's" mind?*
  45.  
  46. _Is that really what you think?!_
  47.  
  48. ______________________________________________________________
  49. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  50.  
  51. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  52. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
  53.  
  54. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  55. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  56.  
  57. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  58. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  59.  
  60. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  61. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  62.  
  63. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  64. What exists - exists to always exist.
  65. As it is written - so it is done.
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment