Slavery

	With the yearly capture and transport of one million black slaves it is not difficult to figure that from 1661 to 1774 (one hundred thirteen years) approximately one hundred ten million slaves had been removed from the continent. About ten percent, or eleven million, black slaves reached the Colonies alive. We have talked about the small ship Abigail which could accommodate only 56 people and yet the profits per trip were enormous, with little or no investment. There were many other ships but we will concentrate here on only a few, such as the La Fortuna, Hannah, Sally, or the Venue, which made very great profits. The La Fortuna, by the way, transported approximately 217 slaves on each trip. The owner cleared not less than $41,438.00 from such a trip. These were dollars which the slave dealers ‘could keep’. And these were dollars of value which would buy a great deal in return.
	When one considers that the Jews of Newport owned about 300 slave-transporting ships, active without interruption, docking at Newport-Africa, Charleston, (or Virginia), one can approximate the tremendous earnings which made their way to Jewish ship owners. Indeed, the Jews admit, that of the 600 ships, leaving Newport harbor into all the world, “at least half of them” went their way to Africa, and we know what these ships going to Africa “were seeking.”
	The fact that Aaron Lopez had control of over more than half of the combined deals in the Colonies of Rhode Island, with Newport, is well-known. The well-known Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein, in his book, The Story of the Jews in Newport, attempts to remove these facts, maintaining that there is not any evidence that the Jews were connected with the Slave Trade. It is therefore imperative to prove that the Jew was indeed connected with the slave trading. Especially so since this rabbi insists they had made great contributions, and how very “blessed” their residence became for the city of Newport. Surely Morris A. Gutstein will grant us permission to present the facts which he was unable to find. Turning to one report of the Chamber of Commerce of the “Rhode Island Colony” in the year 1764, we find, for instance, that in the year 1723 “a few merchants in Newport” devised the idea to send their Newport rum to the coast of Africa. It developed into such a great export that in the matter of a few years “several thousand (hogsheads)” of rum went that way. To which purpose did this rum serve?
	The Carnegie Institute in Washington, D.C., presents and makes public authentic documents entitled “Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade in America”. We wish to present a few facts from this particular collection of original documents and scrutinize them at closer range, and not at all to prove the heretofore Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein in error. In this collection of the first American institute of learning, we evaluate the capital “Rhode Island” which contributed the main share of the public documentation regarding the Slave trading. Here we find documented the recipients of the numerous shipping letters, also letters to the Slave dealers, and correspondence to the ship’s captains, who were about 15% Jews, living in Newport. Among these we find, for instance, the Jew Isaac Elizar. He wrote a letter to Captain Christopher Champlin on February 6, 1763, saying he would like to be an agent for a load of slaves. Then follows the Jew Abraham Pereira Mendez, and one of the main slave dealers, Jacob Rod Rivera-the father-in-law of Aaron Lopez. And then there is Aaron Lopez, himself, and many, many more other Jews. Although we have considered Aaron Lopez several times, the size of this documented treatise limits us, and we cannot describe all of the writers concerned in the Slavery Dealing correspondence, their names and the special dates—rather, we wish to study the documentation of the ’Carnegie Institute’ itself—keeping Aaron Lopez in mind. We wish to see what in the main this Jew was pursuing and what his business was. This is due to the fact that Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein presents him as a "lofty and fine civilian of Newport" who was so generous and even “made contributions to welfare.” In a great number of published original unprejudiced writings in the Carnegie Institute, we find that Aaron Lopez pursued a tremendous commerce in rum with the African coast in exchange for slaves.
	These irrefutable facts are as follows:

	June 22, 1764, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez.
	July 22, 1765, a letter by Aaron Lopez to Captain Nathaniel Briggs.
	July 22, 1765, a letter to Captain Abraham All.
	February 4, 1766, a letter to Captain William Stead by Aaron Lopez.
	March 7, 1766, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez.
	February 20, 1766, a letter by Aaron Lopez to Captain William Stead.
	October 8, 1766, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez.
	February 9, 1767, a letter by Captain William Stead to Aaron Lopez.

	Aside from that, there are similar statements out of letters by Aaron Lopez in the original, which he directed to the Captains Henry Cruger, David Mill, Henry White, Thomas Dolbeare, and William Moore. Indeed, one letter by Captain William Moore to Aaron Lopez & Company, is particularly revealing, and of special mention at this point. We wish to remark on the main contents of this letter in which Captain Moore writes: "I wish to advise you that your ship Ann docked here night before last with 112 slaves, consisting of 35 men, 16 large youths, 21 small boys, 29 women, 2 grown girls, 9 small girls, and I assure you this is such a one rumcargo (rum in exchange for slaves) which I have not yet encountered, among the entire group there may be five to which one could take exception."
	The date of the above letter was November 27, 1773. We have not yet concluded, because of lack of space, the excerpts and grateful compilations made available by the “Carnegie Institute.” On November 29, 1767, the Jew Abraham Pereira Mendez—who had been cheated by one of his kind—from Charleston, where he had journeyed to better control his Black cargo, wrote Aaron Lopez at Newport:
	“These Negroes, which Captain Abraham All delivered to me, were in such poor condition due to the poor transportation, that I was forced to sell 8 boys and girls for a mere 27 (pounds), 2 other for 45 (pounds) and two women each for 35 (pounds).” (No doubt, English money) Abraham Pereia Mendez was very angry and accused Aaron Lopez of “cheating” him. This letter delineates to us that this generous and fine citizen of Newport was insatiable in his greed for money. This is what caused the Rabbi Morris A. Gutstein to present this nobleman, Aaron Lopez, to pursue his objectionable methods. Negroes presented to him but a commodity.
	In all of the letters which the “Carnegie Institute” published, it stresses the lack of human sympathy for the poor Negro slaves. This lack of feeling and compassion for the abused and pitiful Blacks at the hands of their Jewish dealers, can be read out of the diary of a captain who manned a ship owned by Aaron Lopez. The entrees concern a trip from the African Coast to Charleston. Moreover, they are authentic documents, published by the "Camegie Institute" in Washington, D.C., calling attention to an organization which had heretofore known little or nothing about; neither had they encountered further publicity in books or newspapers. Therefore, it is not to be wondered at that the facts of the leading share of American Jews in the slave trade could be pointed out as a monopoly, and unknown to the non-Jewish Americans, including the great masses of people all over the world. Others, however, acquainted with the facts, had good reason to remain painfully quiet. The captain of another ship, the "Othello" among other things, makes the following entries in his diary:

	February 6: One man drowned in the process of loading.
	March 18: Two women went overboard because they had not been locked up.
	April 6: One man dead with Flux. (No doubt an illness.)
	April 13: One woman dead with Flux.
	May 7: One man dead with Flux.
	June 16: One man dead by Kap Henry.
	June 21: One man dead by James Fluss.
	July 5: One woman dead with fever.
	July 6: One girl, sick for two months, died.

	This vessel was on its way for five months. What terrible and unspeakable suffering was the lot of these millions of Blacks, who were torn with brutal force from their friendly African huts, jammed together, like animals below deck, and then sold with less concern than selling a head of cattle. Small wonder that ten of them died, being purchased for just a few dollars, and then sold for the sum of $2,000.00.
	Some Negroes managed, through insurrection, to gain control of one or another ship and turned it around, with full sails, toward their African home. The crew of one slave ship, "Three Friends" for instance, tortured their Black cargo in such a manner that the Negroes reciprocated in a bloody rebellion. They killed the captain and the entire crew and threw the dead overboard. They then sailed back to Africa where they had barely escaped their hard-won freedom.
	A similar fate struck the slave ship Amistad. Among the slaves was the son of an enemy tribal chief. Once the ship was under way, he schemed with his compatriots to attack the ship’s crew. Following a bloody battle, they managed to capture the captain. The Negro prince forced him to turn back to Africa, then in the evening, under cover of darkness, he changed his course, zigzagged for months until he came close to the American coast, and encountered a government ship. This took place in the year 1839 when slave trading was already forbidden and illegal.
	The Negro slaves were freed and the captain punished. These sea voyages were not without danger when they had black cargo, which accounts for the fact that the Jews most always engaged non-Jewish captains. The slave dealers preferred to remain in their offices and counted the fat winnings following each journey, such as Aaron Lopez, who left his heirs one of the largest fortunes in the New England era. When reviewing the documented facts contained herein, it is important that one always remembers that it was a lucky captain who did not lose more than 9 out of 19 slaves on the return trip.
	It is equally important to remember that these poor Black creatures had to lie in human excrement for the entire trip. Think of it! No wonder sickness and disease took such a high toll. Remember the figures: approximately 110,000,000 Black people were captured and removed from their homeland in Africa. Only 11,000,000 of these Black slaves reached the Colonies alive. And the Jews still talk about the Germans and Hitler and how six million Jews were exterminated during World War II. This is the greatest lie ever perpetrated upon the people of the world-whereas the story of the poor black slaves is documented with truth. The evidence is still available for the people of the world to see.
	The Carnegie Institute of Technology is located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. As this document is distributed, eventually reaching the hands of the Jew, the evidence will probably be removed and destroyed until finally all documentation is removed which is damaging to the Jew. The Jews have been engaged in this practice for centuries. Truth, however–truth which bears fact cannot remain covered or hidden forever–and more truths are being disclosed by those of us who intend to free America of these sons of the devil–the Jews. The published documentation contained herein was obtained from the Carnegie Institute of Learning, presently known as The Carnegie Institute of Technology. The following is a partial of the slave ships owned by Jews:

	Abigail by Aaron Lopez.
	Crown by Isaac Levy and Nathan Simpson.
	Nassau by Moses Levy.
	Four Sisters by Moses Levy.
	Anne & Eliza by Justus Bosch and John Abrams.
	Prudent Betty by Henry Cruger and Jacob Phoenix.
	Hester by Mordecai and David Gomez.
	Elizabeth by David and Mordecai Gomez.
	Antigua by Nathan Marston and Abram Lyell.
	Betsy by Wm. DeWoolf.
	PoUy by James DeWoolf.
	White Horse by Jan de Sweevts.
	Expedition by John and Jacob Rosevelt.
	Charlotte by Moses and Sam Levy and Jacob Franks.
	Caracoa by Moses and Sam Levy.

	Slave-runners, also owned by Jews were the La Fortuna, the Hannah, the Sally, and the Venue.
Some of the Jews of Newport and Charleston who were engaged in the distillery or slavery trade, or both, were: Isaac Gomez, Hayman Levy, Jacob Malhado, Naphtaly Myers, David Hart, Joseph Jacobs, Moses Ben Franks, Moses Gomez, Isaac Dias, Benjamin Levy, David Jeshuvum, Jacob Pinto, Jacob Turk, Daniel Gomez, James Lucana, Jan de Sweevts, Felix (cha-cha) de Souza (known as the “Prince of Slavers” and second only to Aaron Lopez), Simeon Potter, Isaac Elizer, Jacob Rod, Jacol) Itodrigues Rivera, Haym Isaac Carregal, Abraham Touro, Moses Hays, Moses Lopez, Judah Touro, Abrtham Mendes and Abraham All.
	Of some 600 ships leaving the port of Newport, more than 300 were engaged in the slave trade. A typical cargo of one ship, La Fortuna, was 217 slaves which cost about $4,300 and sold for $41,438.00. Only about 10% of the slave ship captains were Jews, not wanting to subject themselves to the rigors of the 6-month journey. They preferred to stay at home and continue their distillery operations which continued to supply rum and whiskey to the Indians for many years at a very great profit.
	For decades, the white people of America have been subjected to a continual barrage from blacks (and others) that they are somehow “responsible” for the African slave trade and that we need to “atone” for our “guilt.” There are a number of flaws with the idea that we are somehow “responsible” for the African slave trade. First, very few whites even owned slaves. Slavery was a rich man’s pursuit and did not exist among the middle and working classes of whites. Second, even if every one of us had an ancestor who owned slaves, it is impossible to blame the children for the sins of their fathers. Third, it is a fact that blacks sold their own kind into slavery. As this is the case, blacks are to blame for slavery as much as whites. Fourth, whites did not bring slaves to America. Jews did.
	– Elizabeth Donnan, four volumes: Documents Illustrative of the Story of the Slave Trade to America, Washington DC, 1930-35, Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, PA

~:~

	I am totally against the removal of the Confederate flag in modern times due to removing it advancing cultural marxism, but the Confederacy was, of course, actually bad, and it was backed by the jews. Jews started and ran the slave trade. (1) They did so because it was incredibly profitable for them. Know how everyone always says that only something like 2% of whites owned all the slaves? Want to know who those “whites” actually were?
	Anyway, the Confederacy did secede for states’ rights–the states’ right to have slavery. The Jews loved this. Remember, the Revolutionary War was fought primarily over King George III’s currency act, which prohibited the colonies from printing their own currency and mandated them to borrow money from the Bank of Britain, at interest. (2) Benjamin Franklin stated, “The refusal of King George III to allow the colonies to operate an honest money system which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators was probably the prime cause of the revolution.”
	Well, the US won that war. Eventually the Jews demanded that the US allow a central bank again, and we said no, so they forced the war of 1812 on us. Rothschild said, “Teach those impudent Americans a lesson. Bring them back to colonial status!” The Jews were forced into a stalemate in that war. Half a century later, Abraham Lincoln became president and decided to wipe out slavery for good. Since jews didn’t want that to happen, they spun a lie in the South that the North was oppressing them, and they used their power in the southern states to get them to secede. The jews bet on British and French military support for the Confederacy (they had been openly trading with the Confederacy and giving them supplies), outright invading the North to finally crush the US. Once that was done, the jews would have demanded the Confederacy create a central bank similar to the modern Federal Reserve. It was only the Russian Empire sending a massive naval fleet to the east coast of the United States that stopped the British and French empires from entering the war. (3)
	Lincoln planned on either instituting total segregation or deporting all of the blacks back to sub-saharan Africa once the war was done. (4) He greatly preferred the latter. He knew that slavery had to be taken down and that the Union had to be preserved in its foundational state, else it would be crushed. “United we stand, divided we fall.” If not for Russia, he might not have even been able to pull it off. The Confederacy was the same as the Allies of both world wars–used and abused for the benefit of a few and their zionistic plans.
	Fast forward 150 years. No one knows a damn thing about the Civil War anymore. The few who do either think the Union was good just because “slavery was bad, the end.” It is, but they don’t see the bigger, international picture. Or they’re Confederate supporters who believe in the “lost cause” notion and who think the Confederacy was all about states’ rights and “freedom” when really it was by the Jews, for the Jews. At the same time, all modern people who support the Confederate flag do it out of heritage and a resistance to big brother and political correctness. All those who oppose it are either big brother or SJW types. The actual Civil War was about economics (the jews and their money), morality (enslaving people–even other species–isn’t cool), and making sure the United States wasn’t brought back to colonial status as Nathan so bluntly put it. The modern day “the red, white, and blue cross flag is bad because (insert SJW shit here) vs. it’s good because states’ rights and freedom” is just a giant cultural war.
	So support the flag. Don’t let them take it down. Fight against cultural marxism. But know your history and stop trying to act like in the beginning that flag was anything good. To all the Confederate bros who have had their lifelong worldview shattered, sorry, but truth doesn’t care about feelings. To all the Union bros who have had their lifelong worldview shattered, sorry, but the Civil War was way more important and over way more than just slavery. And Lincoln certainly wasn’t the great black adorer that you act like he was.

1. http://rense.com/general69/invo.htm
2. http://www.revolutionary-war-and-beyond.com/currency-act.html
3. http://www.voltairenet.org/article169488.html
4. http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n5p-4_Morgan.html

~:~

	Time for some fun math.
	In the 1840 US census, the population was 17,069,453, including 2,487,355 slaves. Therefore the US had a non-slave population of 14,582,098. According to jewishdatabank.org, there were approximately 50,000 jews living in the US in 1848. Combining these statistics, we find that Jews were .34% of the US population, by a very generous estimate (the nation grew considerably between 1840 and 1848, but these were all the statistics I could find). Now, according to Jewish historian Seymore Drescher’s research, Jews accounted for 1.25% of all slave owners. So .34% of the population represented 1.25% of the slave owners (note that number of slaves owned is conveniently left out, since in all likelihood they owned greater numbers of slaves). Jews were therefore 3.6 times more likely to be slave owners than American whites were before the civil war. OY VEY, IT’S ANOTHER SHOAH!

~:~

	Leaders of Christianity, including Pope Gregory the Great (pope 590-604), objected to Jews owning Christian slaves, due to concerns about conversion to Judaism and the Talmud’s requirement to circumcise slaves. (12) The first prohibition of Jews owning Christian slaves was made by Constantine I in the 4th century. The Third Council of Orleans in 538 repeated the prohibition for Gaul. The prohibition was repeated by subsequent councils - Fourth Council of Orleans (541), Paris (633), Fourth Council of Toledo (633), the Synod of Szabolcs (1092) extended the prohibition to Hungary, Ghent (1112), Narbonne (1227), Beziers (1246). It was part of St. Benedict’s rule that Christian slaves were not to serve Jews. (13)
	Despite the prohibition Jewish participation in slave trading during the Middle Ages existed to some extent. Jews were the chief traders in the segment of Christian slaves at some epochs (14) and played a significant role in the slave trade in some regions. (15) During the Middle Ages, Jews acted as slave-traders in Slavonia (17) North Africa,(14) Baltic States, (18) Central and Eastern Europe, (15) Spain and Portugal, (14)(15) and Mallorca (19) The most significant Jewish involvement in the slave-trade was in Spain and Portugal in the 10th to 15th centuries. (14)(15)
	Jewish participation in the slave trade was recorded starting in the 5th century, when Pope Gelasius permitted Jews to introduce slaves from Gaul into Italy, on the condition that they were non-Christian. (20) In the 8th century, Charlemagne (king 768-814) explicitly allowed the Jews to act as intermediaries in the slave trade. (21) In the 10th century, Spanish Jews traded in Slavonian slaves, whom the Caliphs of Andalusia purchased to form their bodyguards. (21) In Bohemia, Jews purchased these Slavonian slaves for exportation to Spain and the west of Europe (21) William the Conqueror brought Jewish slave-dealers with him from Rouen to England in 1066 (22) At Marseilles in the 13th century, there were two Jewish slave-traders, as opposed to seven Christians. (23)
	Middle Ages historical records from the 9th century describes two routes by which Jewish slave-dealers carried slaves from West to East and from East to West. (20) According to Abraham ibn Yakub, Byzantine Jewish merchants bought Slays from Prague to be sold as slaves. Louis The Fair granted charters to Jews visiting his kingdom, permitting them to trade in slaves, provided the latter had not been baptized. Agobard claimed that the Jews did not abide to the agreement and kept Christians as slaves, citing the instance of a Christian refugee from Cordova who declared that his co-religionists were frequently sold, as he had been, to the Moors. Many of the Spanish Jews owed their fortune to the trade in Slavonian slaves brought from Andalusia (24) Similarly, the Jews of Verdun, about the year 949, purchased slaves in their neighborhood and sold them in Spain. (25)

~:~

	1. All races kept slaves, all throughout history.
	2. Most of the “American” slave ships and “American” slave markets were run by Jews. The largest slave market in Connecticut was always closed on Saturday, after all. No one blames modern Jews. Because if anyone today says anything was “run by Jews”, they’re immediately dismissed as a crazy antisemite, regardless of whether or not it’s true.
	3. When the transatlantic slave ships docked at African slave markets to buy slaves, they bought slaves who were already slaves. It was Arab Muslims and black Africans themselves who captured members of rival tribes and took them to the coastal slave market to sell to the Jews. White people didn’t go into Africa and kidnap free black people. They barely needed to get off their ships to buy slaves. It was like buying McDonalds at a drive through. The slaves were already at the slave market in chains, ready to go.
	4. In the 16th–18th centuries, Africans enslaved 1.5 million white Europeans in the Barbary slave trade. African Muslims raided up the coastline of Europe–particularly the British Isles, but even as far as Iceland–kidnapping and enslaving white European Christians. The men were galley slaves and the women were sex slaves. This was more brutal than working on a plantation or as a domestic servant. Where are the calls for reparations?
	5. Indioes and Jews owned black slaves, too, but no one seems to assign collective guilt to modern Indioes and Jews for their slavery. In fact, Jews were the biggest slave owners in America per capita.
	6. Whites were the first people to stop slavery in modern times, whereas slavery still continues in Africa to this day. In Mauritania, slavery was only made a punishable offense in 2007.
	7. Less than 2% of whites in America ever owned slaves.
	8. Only 5% of the black slaves transported across the Atlantic went to the US. Most went to Latin America to serve Hispanic slave-owners. Where is the demonization of Hispanics as slave owners?