[2015-09-19 06:04:40] [Output] : *Luis Rodrigues looks over to the inside of him glocking the gun as he looks over to Ncholas.*
[2015-09-19 06:04:42] [Output] : District IC: You'd hear a series of loud sub-machine gun gunshots echoing throughout the vicinity
I'm sorry, what? 42 minus 40 IS two, is it not? Please be more polite when addressing me, I'm not your friend nor do you have any right to blatantly spew venomous accusations of me "making lies up".

Fun fact: you roleplayed shooting even before he got that gun out:
[2015-09-19 06:04:34] [Output] :  [English] Julio Lopez says: What is this guy, some Arnold Shwarts?
[2015-09-19 06:04:35] [Output] : ★ Nicholas Krauss slams the car into reverse as he spots Luis reaching, raising the AB-10 and Glock 22 to
[2015-09-19 06:04:35] [Output] :  [English] Hector Ramirez says: The fuck is wrong with you man?
[2015-09-19 06:04:36] [Output] :  [English] Julio Lopez says: Two guns?
[2015-09-19 06:04:40] [Output] : ★ -- begin firing through the windshield.      ((Nicholas Krauss))
[2015-09-19 06:04:40] [Output] : *Luis Rodrigues looks over to the inside of him glocking the gun as he looks over to Ncholas.*


"He reached for a gun so I shot, it's valid."
You could not see him pull that gun, thus had no reason to shoot up three people randomly in Idlewood. End of story. I can't believe I'm actually explaining this to a lead administrator.

"[...] His own bullet didn't fly back at him, fragments of glass hit him but it doesn't matter because none of it went into his eyes like you are saying in any of those videos. [...] I shot 30 yes which means I have a higher possibility of killing you."
A cop shoots 15 bullets through his windshield and ends up getting injured, you shoot thirty and you fail to roleplay a single injury. Higher possibility of killing me, yes. Killing two people in four seconds by aiming a gun with one hand through a windshield that deflects bullets and injures you, no. This is all really common sense, I do not see why I have to keep arguing this point as it's really self explanatory.

"[...] If someone was put into the situation where they had to shoot multiple people I don't see why they couldn't or shouldn't use two weapons at their disposal. [...]"
I'm not even going to bother explaining this any further, I can't believe you're a lead administrator that fails to understand why your accuracy is heavily reduced when shooting a submachine gun with one hand. I'm done with you just arguing just for the sake of it. Dual wielding was specifically removed from RP servers as it's extremely non-RP due to accuracy loss. You did exactly what the system is set-up that you do not do. I'm done with this point, can't believe you do not understand this.

"[...] You're changing your argument from me PGing to MGing to DMing. [...]"
Positive I've never said "metagaming" at all. I've said either you deathmatched and shot us for the kick of it, or just powergamed yourself seeing that gun, which you already just admitted doing as I've clearly stated in my previous respond.

I believe there are no further points to argue, Wright's distance from the vehicle can be proven using many methods that he was NOT "five feet away". Witnesses can also account for Wright being in a position where he was NOT capable of seeing Bunny's actions within the vehicle, implying that he shot Bunny without even knowing that he had a gun. Not only this, but as mentioned above in this comment he just went on to shoot Bunny regardless of him taking out a gun or not.


Thank you for your "professional" responses Wright,
maramizo.