Lesta

8 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-10-29 2355 +Brian Hill

Oct 29th, 2016
103
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.87 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-10-29 2355 +Brian Hill
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acsyb0Krk1Y&google_comment_id=z132ezowtluchp3bi04ccjgxsr3cdn1xfgk
  3. https://pastebin.com/iu6BJZVi
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Brian Hill __ I can only echo what +nationalparksign has written! You have talked about these things for a long time with us yet you don't seem to have learned a thing!
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11. We have discussed "fatal mistakes" in the past. I have written about fatal mistakes in the past. You are asking the same things over and over!
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15.  
  16. A MISTAKE (I only include the "fatal" part to appease my other alter-ego puppet account +cabadejo) is that which would NECESSARILY PROVES something to be a LIE.
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20. A "fatal mistake" can be considered that which necessarily proves something DID NOT happen whereas "sufficient proof" can be considered that which necessarily proves something DID happen.
  21.  
  22.  
  23.  
  24. So why do you need me to tell you? Why can't you figure this out for yourself?! *This is EASY STUFF*.
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28. If the claim is that people are in MICRO/ZERO-GRAVITY then a MISTAKE (i.e., "fatal mistake") *would be to see something under the influence of normal gravity WHEN it is being genuinely insisted that it is micro/zero-gravity*.
  29.  
  30.  
  31.  
  32. For example - if you saw an "astronaut" juggling then that would be a fatal mistake!
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36. Did you really need me to point that out?! I have been through all of this with you in the past.
  37.  
  38.  
  39.  
  40. __
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44. You are again putting words into my mouth. This video does not show a mistake (fatal OR otherwise)! This video points out a sneaky edit - that's all.
  45.  
  46.  
  47.  
  48. The sneaky edit as presented means NOTHING with regard to the truth value of the central claim.
  49.  
  50.  
  51.  
  52. >> Nothing says that "JAXA" cannot do hard cuts in their videos! <<
  53.  
  54.  
  55.  
  56. Their videos are riddled with hard cuts! In their most recent video there is another hard cut - it looks like a few frames got chopped out.
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60. Watch this video: watch?v=G_kLLSZ9cUU
  61.  
  62.  
  63.  
  64. And pay attention to the video between: 4m15s and 4m19s. You will find there is a hard cut just on ~4m17s.
  65.  
  66.  
  67.  
  68. Does that mean the video is fake? >> *NO!* <<
  69.  
  70.  
  71.  
  72. *It ONLY means that we are NOT looking at a genuinely continuous piece of footage and THAT is what disqualifies it from being considered "sufficient proof" etc*.
  73.  
  74.  
  75.  
  76. This is simple stuff.
  77.  
  78.  
  79.  
  80. __
  81.  
  82.  
  83.  
  84. What the F_KC are you talking about with: "pronounce it a lie unequivocally or shut up"?
  85.  
  86.  
  87.  
  88. So you want me to ASSERT as a FACT ABOUT REALITY that the "ISS" is NOT real and manned WHEN THERE IS NO WAY FOR ME TO ACTUALLY KNOW IT?!?!
  89.  
  90.  
  91.  
  92. You want me to assert as a fact about reality the "ISS" is fake because there is a clever cut in a video?!
  93.  
  94.  
  95.  
  96. You've lost the plot!
  97.  
  98.  
  99.  
  100. I have explained what a "fatal mistake" is above - you could have figured that out for yourself. And if you are insisting on things being called TRUE or FALSE without SUFFICIENT PROOF then you are practicing BELIEF-BIAS.
  101.  
  102.  
  103.  
  104. You are engaging in the fallacy of the "conspiracy theorist". You're using twisted pretzel logic such as:
  105.  
  106.  
  107.  
  108. "If the ISS were real then there would be no video trickery and since there is consistent video trickery to be found then it must be fake."
  109.  
  110.  
  111.  
  112. You have again demonstrated practically zero understanding about the lie system yet you have probably talked the MOST about it!
  113.  
  114.  
  115.  
  116. I like that you talk about it - but f_kc! - absolutely no progress has been made with you!
  117.  
  118.  
  119. ______________________________________________________________
  120. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  121.  
  122. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  123. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
  124.  
  125. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  126. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  127.  
  128. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  129. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  130.  
  131. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  132. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  133.  
  134. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  135. What exists - exists to always exist.
  136. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment