Warlock The Armageddon 720p Movies

********************
Warlock: The Armageddon 720p Movies
http://urllio.com/r3y4l
(Copy & Paste link)
********************
































An order of Druids train their children to battle an evil Warlock determined to unleash Satan upon the world by bringing a collection of six mystic rune stones together.
Every six hundred years, a great evil has the opportunity to escape and unleash Armageddon. A group of five stones has the power to either free the evil, or banish it for another six hundred years. An order of Druids battles with a Warlock determined to unleash his father upon the world.
This Movie was Bollex, plain and simple. Whilest I will agree with my esteemed  forebears who have commented before that it was bad, I will also agree that it did have some good moments as well, but, on a whole, it was still all Bollex. I did like, however, that Julian Sands was in it. He is pretty much grand in anything he is in, but that still did not save this movie. He has good lines, but, I do not think that Sands heart was in the role. He did, however, look pretty tight in his ever clean black get-up.  As stated in earlier comments, Sands plays a super Warlock who is neigh indestructible, which takes away from the movie, at least to me.  I would like to know if he is playing the same character as from the first movie, or another one entirely, which never gets answered. Sands has some good lines, but, since the Warlock could not be killed, he just kinda hung out, killed some poor shmoo, took his trippy rock, and continued on his merry way. The heros were both annoying, and the plotline about druids and God and saving the world from an imprisoned Satan are all rubbish. What self respecting lord of all evil get's imprisoned by frelling druids in the first place? The part where the guy get's turned into a sculpture was cool, as was the secondary character played by the dude from Friday the Thirteenth: The series. It is good to see him play a hero type for one. Also, it was funny to see Zack Galliger in it from Gremlins. I hope I spelled his name right. Joanna Pacula must have need the cash, as she was in this movie for all of five minutes before she got axed. The deaths in the movie, and there were many, were rather novel, but it did not save it from being Bollex.
Not as good as the first installment. It lacks the chase element, which bogs down the plot. The magical Druid theme is also a bit too cheesy. This film probably had a slightly bigger budget than the first, so the special effects are a bit better. Also, the magical scenarios are really interesting and fun. The acting is acceptable, and the script is alright.<br/><br/>It&#39;s kind of funny how the premise of this movie has the Warlock moving from east to the west coast, opposite of the first film. But there was no interaction between the lead heroes and the warlock until the vary end. That is where this film falls short. The audience gets no sense of desperation, no tension between the heroes and the villain.<br/><br/>An acceptable follow up to the first, but somewhat disappointing. Still worth watching after the first one though.

The studio that released this felt that not enough people saw the original one to justify it as a sequel. The other problem is that the first Warlock is a story that does not leave itself open for a sequel. If this were a true sequel, the Warlock would only have to utter gods name in reverse at the films beginning. The Warlock is the same warlock from the first film, but the two films are not canon. While the second part of the Warlock trilogy was directly released in it&#39;s unrated form, Trimark only released the slightly shorter R-Rated Version in the United States. There&#39;s no huge difference, though. The Unrated Version runs only 10 seconds longer and no gore effects were added.  497e39180f