Arkay Nair Disproof

Arkay Nair Disproof
“The orbital motions of the heavenly bodies are not observed by the Earth”
FALSE: Constellations move
“The Earth is the barycenter of the solar system”
FALSE: The Sun is the primary body of the solar system, and the Earth’s barycenter with the sun is 446 km from the sun’s core - inside the Sun.
As per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson–Morley_experiment, the Michelson-Morley experiment disproved the existence of a stationary aether. This, combined with the assumption that the Earth does rotate (as per point 1), led to the hypothesis (later proven correct) that electromagnetic radiation can transmit through a vacuum.
Space is a vacuum as the density of matter is 10-93 g cm-1, well below the density of the Earth’s atmosphere
Yes, c is constant for all observers, I’ll give you that point.
We did have proof for the heliocentric model as per http://www.astronomy.com/magazine/ask-astro/2017/01/proof-earth-revolves-around-the-sun. Furthermore, Venus has phases, which can only happen if Venus is closer to the Sun than the Earth.
The Bohr atom has been deprecated.
Uranium is not the largest atom. Moscovium (Mc) the 118th element is.
The Earth-Sun barycentre is within the sun as per 2a
Light is an electromagnetic wave as proven through the 2 slit experiment
We can’t see stars during the day because the sky is too bright. If the sun were to disappear, we would see the stars 24/7
Yes, space contains matter and matter is within space.
The Ideal Gas Law is not relevant. That’s a given of vacuum conditions.
Aether is not Plasma, space is mostly empty
Yes, plasma is primarily hydrogen. However, this is primarily stellar matter
Photons must have a mass of 0 if they are to travel at c. Therefore, they cannot be hydrogen
False definitions. Matter can be defined as something you can hold in your hand, and energy can be defined as something that moves or heats an object
The EM waves exist in vacuum, not aether. It all gets weird on a quantum level
Light is EM radiation, which do not require a medium
Plasma requires extreme conditions to produce
The big bang isn’t a single spot in space. It’s all of space expanding at once. The repulsion is other objects being pushed around.
Under such extreme conditions as the big bang, classical physics breaks down
Raleigh Scattering (in the sky) != Blue shift
The Earth is 9 bn years younger than the universe so that point is not relevant
The sky is not made of plasma, it is air. Space is a vacuum
Plasma hydrogen (stars) is all bar identical to molecular hydrogen (H2) except that it is a soup of electrons (e-) and hydrogen ions/protons (H+)
That’s not how neutrons form
Not all reactions tend to equilibrium. Some, such as the dissolution of sulfuric acid in water (H2SO4(l)+2H2O(l)->2H3O+(aq)+SO4- (aq)) do go to completion
Plants do not reverse entropy. The earth is not a closed system as the sun supplies energy
There are more than four states of matter
E=mc3 doesn’t work
There is no absolute value of anything
An observer is anything that changes a particle
On your list:
* True
* False - Time dilation disproves this
* False - Length contraction disproves this
* False - Bose-Einstein condensates disprove this
* Where’s your proof for this
* Gravity is solely attractive - centripetal and centrifugal forces are not gravity
* Prove this
That’s not how that works. The light will not enter a body unless it passes a black hole’s event horizon
The Lorentz factor does exist, and the maths works. If time dilation didn’t exist, GPS systems would not work
Numbers are not on a circle
i!=1, i=sqrt(-1)