Freedesktop.org says you must respect & love pedosexuals

MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8c05:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 23 May 2018 08:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 22:50:36 +0700
Delivered-To: hojuruku@gmail.com
Message-ID: <CAENjB=LqB51UsZLrNoqY=0XbYEbOYOk9aHHz0Ujkq9PLcTq+3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: banned from bugtracker for doing nothing wrong on bugtracker because I was trolled by a dev putting out 3x falsehoods
From: Luke McKee <hojuruku@gmail.com>
To: sitewranglers@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com, daniel@fooishbar.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ee8257056ce17e72"

--000000000000ee8257056ce17e72
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Where is the "Extremely hostile and prone to ranting about how people he
doesn't like are 'LGBTI nut[s]', as well as about how LGBTI education
programs are 'subverting [Australian] youth'. No idea how you got to that
point from a discussion about licenses, but freedesktop.org welcomes anyone
regardless of gender, sexuality, etc. I would recommend reviewing this:
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/CodeOfConduct/ "

LGBTI stuff I put on the bugtracker? Why does leftists who look up my
youtube channel try and ban me from bug trackers when I only talk ON TOPIC
about mesa matters like here:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106625

Here's the comment i would have made if I wasn't banned. Everything on that
ticket was technical only and on topic. It doesn't deserve a ban for
pointing out a dev was wrong on 3x counts.


<hojuruku> you were wrong on 3 counts.. if you are a mesa developer for
ubuntu (which I don't touch with 30 ft pole, though I'm going to try some
your chromium patches shortly that's about it) then don't go putting
falsehoods on tickets.
<hojuruku> go for quality not quantity on bugtracker responses.
<daniels> i left canonical in very early 2006, but ok
<daniels> you can do what you like, but the 'LGBTI nut' and bizzare rant
about 'pedophiles and their special gay police friends' has earned you a
ban from bugzilla and the lists
<daniels> you can review our code of conduct on the website if you like,
which pretty clearly rules out abusing people based on their sexuality
<daniels> (even if you do happen to be totally wrong about it)
<daniels> have a good evening
<hojuruku> so you trolled
<hojuruku> and trolled
<hojuruku> so what did I do wrong on bugzilla?
<hojuruku> I proved you wrong?
<hojuruku> and I get banned for only being right ?
<daniels> literally not what you said, but no point discussing with someone
who invents their own reality

Clearly we have a leftist nut troll who trolls people on IRC, and the bug
tracker then bans for his ulterior motive. He knows me from 2003 slug.org.au
/ linux conf mailing list before I became a UNHCR confirmed political
refugee from Australia.

Egomaniacs....

He said:
1) libomx-bellago was not LGPL
2) AMD doesn't distribute a binary gst-plugins-omx
3) and accused me all over IRC of reporting an GPL VIOLATION  (not a source
code request)

Trolls me, and then get's me banned. Clearly those who are not politically
correct outside the bugtracker needs to be banned on it for XYZ pride.


Here's the IRC log that has nothing to do with the bugtracker.

I WAS FALSELY ACCUSED OF ACCUSING MESA OF A GPL/LGPL violation when I did
no such thing.

And the other 2x falsehoods in the ticket. If you prove a dev wrong on tech
facts you get banned? Please expalin.
* jrmuizel (~jrmuizel@corp-nat.fw1.untrust.tor1.mozilla.com) has joined
<daniels> hojuruku: glad you got your source, but please try to be less
hostile about it in future. thanks.
<hojuruku> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106625 not hostile
mate. You were the one that was hostile that thought i was doing a LGPL
source code request (not violation) against mesa - when it was to AMD from
the onset.
<hojuruku> well you thought i was hostile
<imirkin_> as a (mostly) external observer, daniels seemed quite reasonable
in his comments.
<hojuruku> I was just trying to find out how to use a feature in Mesa that
wasn't documented properly by anyone - and the source to activate that
feature appeared to from the mesa driver source appear to be a patch to
libomxil-bellago but in fact it was just a patch to gst-plugins-omx
<hojuruku> Anyway I'm happy. i abused the freedesktop.org bugtracker to get
a link to some source code from AMD and I got it. I'm happy. Mission
accomplished and those who read the bug tracker will not that you can do
h265 decoding from openmax now too, and how to do it.
<imirkin_> then ask that, rather than go around claiming license violations.
<hojuruku> (without using AMD's binary drivers)
<hojuruku> (and modifying config for said binary drivers)
<hojuruku> where did I claim a code violation?
<imirkin_> that's how i read your original comment.
<hojuruku> LGPL all you have to do is say where the source code  is
<hojuruku> Bug 106625 - AMD HEVC support for for libomxil-bellagio /
gst-plugins-omx
<imirkin_> yes, that one.
<hojuruku> it was opened as a feature request in the headline? where did it
say LGPL VIolation (not source code request)
<hojuruku> the headline was a feature request, or a documentation / example
source code to use an existing feature request
<hojuruku> "The patches are probably already floating AMD's [offices'], OMX
HEVC support has found it's way into mesa but [not] to the libraries that
use it."
<hojuruku> that's what the ticket was about... it was always about the
libraries that use the mesa gallim state tracker library / mesa dll drivers.
* FRIGN has quit (Quit: Leaving)
<hojuruku> "Can one use omx HEVC decode in the mesa state tracker without
AMD's patch to libomxil-bellago [or plugin-gst-openmax - depending where
they implemented the feature] ? Can you please release it?"
<daniels> hojuruku: i'm super happy that the code is out there, that people
can make use of it, and that they can reuse it for free drivers. but from a
legal point of view, i'm less happy about people using mesa/fd.o as a base
to throw claims of license violations at third parties.
<hojuruku> can "you" being AMD devs on the readonsi section of mesa
bugtracker.
<hojuruku> Where was the claim of license violation.
<hojuruku> please copy paste it please... It's only a GPL violation when
AMD releases patched opensource libraries and DOESN'T link to the source /
make the fork public
<hojuruku> at which point you request the source from AMD it isn't a
violation until amd says get stuffed we won't release our source to our
fork of an opensource app under the LGPL.... so there never was a violation.
<daniels> it's a waste of our time to go back and forth on it, but if you
really want to, try comment two. (regardless of whether or not any changes
are made whatsoever, any LGPL binary distribution must be accompanied by an
offer of source code, full stop.)
<daniels> all that i'm asking is that you tone it down a little bit. i'm
not looking for a fight, but a lot of what you write comes across as over
aggressive.
<hojuruku> daniels imirkin_ ^^^ see above. Where exactly in that ticket did
I say LGPL Violators bend down? No.. I said someone was dead wrong
"Bellagio (and Mesa generally) are not licensed under the GPL," - So i link
to the COPYING FILES for libomx-belligo / gst-plugins-omx and they both say
LGPL oops..
<hojuruku> daniels: in addition to being dead wrong about omix-bellagilo
not being GPL ... there is this gem "
<hojuruku> So for this to be enforceable under the GPL: AMD would need to
have definitely written the code (it is not clear if this has even
happened), and distributed binaries built from it (it seems clear this has
not happened), and the code would need to be under (L)GPL (it isn't).
<hojuruku> "
<daniels> i understand what you're saying; i don't think you understand the
severity of having mesa/fd.o tarnished by having people throw around words
which could be interpreted by a reasonable observer (apparently there were
at least two of us who read it the same way) as claiming a license
violation.
<hojuruku> Are you saying AMD is not distributing binaries from
gst-plugins-openmax? Didn't I say they were in the Original post on the bug
with a link to a download location?
<hojuruku> So dead wrong x2
<MrCooper> hojuruku: since you reported a bug in Mesa's bug tracker, we
foolishly assumed it was related to Mesa, which isn't (L)GPL
<hojuruku> daniels: waste of time to go backwards and forwards. No you stop
being hostile. TELL ME WHERE I SAID GPL CODE VIOLATION? I didn't.  IT
RELATED TO A FEATURE IN MESA that required libomxil-bellago and AS it
happens A PATCHED gst-plugins-omx in order to use.
* jsaa (jsaa@nat/intel/x-kixhgrcbiowbndct) has joined
<daniels> hojuruku: if you re-read comment #6, you'll see that I realised
what was going on. that you were using 'GPL' in relation to gst-omx (which
is LGPL), but mostly just asking about the source for bellagio or a sample
client (which are not LGPL).
* headless (~headless@31.173.83.107) has joined
<hojuruku> so you were wrong... and I was hostile for politely correcting,
you. yeah let's not go backwards and forwards. it's all in the ticket.
* Lyude has quit (Quit: WeeChat 2.0.1)
<hojuruku> LGPL requires source to be released for forks of libraries
distributed in binary form by corporations
<daniels> hojuruku: if it's that important to you to prove that i was 'dead
wrong', and i was right, then great, you can have that. all i'm asking is
to stop shouting in upper case, stop demanding answers to the same question
multiple times, etc. the way you communicate is very hostile.
<imirkin_> you realize there's no upside for you here, right? you've
exhausted any kind of good will that one by default gets around here...
* Lyude (~lyudess@pool-98-118-43-90.bstnma.ftas.verizon.net) has joined
<daniels> s/and i was right/and you were right/
* udovdh (~udovdh@2001:981:a812:0:e2d5:5eff:fea3:6b35) has joined
<udovdh> hello
<udovdh> I found some error in dmesg:
<udovdh> [drm:dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Failed to pin
framebuffer with error -12
<hojuruku> I was asking for the patched source for libomx-bellagio (one
place they could have implemented HEVC - patching the openmax-il
impemention) or in amd's case they used unpatched openmax bellagio and a
patched gst-plugins-openmax....
<imirkin_> udovdh: sounds like something for #radeon
<udovdh> and amdgpu 0000:09:00.0: 00000000805434a4 pin failed
<udovdh> ok
* amerel has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
* fab_ (~fab@bellet.info) has joined
* KishoreKadiyala has quit (Quit: Leaving.)
<hojuruku> yeah just drop it, you probably know who I am and hate me
because of the work I do at http://youtube.com/hojuruku - so enough said. I
just had a video censored from my youtube channel on request from Drew West
Press who makes videos praising how good it is to have child sex gateway
dolls.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkbydZAzg3o That was the last
person to complain to get a video censored my channel. Some people are used
to being
<hojuruku> trolled by nutters always trying to pick a fight because they
don't like a certian politically correct minority group subverting our
youth (kidsrights.org.au vs facebook.com/policeglbti) - I'm not going to
engage trolls after me but when people say I'm wrong when I'm right I'll
assertively stand my ground and say NO you are wrong if you are. And If I'm
wrong likewise I'll admit that.
<hojuruku> what I was saying is maybe you had an anterior motive for doing
repeately making false claims of a LGPL violation when I never said it.
Made false claims that the software mesa linked to wasn't LGPL when it was
and made the false claim amd (who maintain the gallium radeon state
tracker) weren't binary distributing said driver. Then still parroting on
I'm wrong wrong wrong. I'm sorry. if the truth is on my side I'm going to
say it end of
<hojuruku> story. So move on and I don't care if I have to massage other
peoples ego's jumping on bugtracker tickets acting hosting and publishing
false info.
<daniels> no, i had absolutely no idea you had a youtube channel about
child sex dolls. i have many interests, but that's not one of them.
<hojuruku> I don't have a youtube channel about child sex dolls. I have
pedophiles after me and their special gay police friends.
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=M8K996WOHNXD clearly you are trolling
me with more strawmen false claims. If you saw my channel you wouldn't be
saying that. Clearly you are trolling me here like you are trolling me on
the freedesktop bugtracker. Ignored.
* thuttu77 (~thuttu77@82-181-37-124.bb.dnainternet.fi) has joined
<hojuruku> clearly you can't read English. Scroll up. Did I say it was my
channel? No. This off topic discussion from the LGBTI nut who knows my nick
and hates me is over. Done.
* cwabbott (~cwabbott@c-24-61-133-212.hsd1.ct.comcast.net) has joined
* murray has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
* ChanServ gives channel operator status to ajax
* ajax sets quiet on $a:hojuruku
<imirkin_> i guess i missed out with the /ignore?
* maelcum (~horst@dslb-088-075-239-153.088.075.pools.vodafone-ip.de) has
joined
<daniels> imirkin_: if not hearing rants about how I'm a 'LGBTI nut' allied
with 'pedophiles and their special gay police friends' counts as 'missing
out', then yeah
<hojuruku> daniel knows me from slug.org.au / linux conf days in 2k3 no
doubt. i'm a political refugee from Australia. Don't ask don't go there.
Agree to disagree move on.
* #dri-devel :Cannot send to channel
<imirkin_> :)
>daniels< i know you fuck, you went to slug.org.au / linux.conf in Australia
>daniels< i know you from the slug mailing list way back, but I used a
different nick then, just rack off you troll
<danvet> ajax, thx, got distracted when I wanted to read up and figure out
whether to ban or not
* danvet approves
<daniels> (i've extended this to bz as well)
* medfly (~fly@141.226.161.149) has joined
* glennk has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
* glennk (~glenn@c-6042d854.010-226-6d6c6d10.bbcust.telenor.se) has joined
* shadeslayer has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)