Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-01 0940 +MomoTheBellyDancer
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJWhWaOI5hQ&lc=z130wp5g5w3kvft2022vyp35tzyjebacn
- https://pastebin.com/iih9XTP6
- __
- +MomoTheBellyDancer __ What? It can't. *It must not have been a hoax!* Oh - _hang on_ - I see what you've done. Like a retard you have *assumed the conclusion.*
- *Due to your low IQ and literal brain:* Because the "Nepal earthquake" was a "real event" it must have triggered seismological equipment all over the world. Since seismological equipment was triggered all over the world the "Nepal earthquake" must have been a real event. *Since the "Nepal earthquake" was a real event it cannot have been a hoax.* _Very tight logic!_ I wonder what the problem could be?!
- Your "argument" is typical of retarded people: *It's real because it's real.* _Very clever!_
- So, uh.. what was the *furthest measuring station* to have picked up the alleged "Nepal earthquake"? What? You don't know off the top of your head? *Okay, name just one measuring station to have picked it up.* What? You don't know any without Googling?
- If you need to look any of this up then you *don't really know* and you are just *assuming* that "seismological equipment all over the world *must have* picked it up". Because - _of course_ - it was a "real event"!
- Do you think that geological "figures" that come from machines cannot be doctored in a coordinated way "for the greater good"? Even if the devices did give a coordinated result *do you think the devices cannot ever be made to give an artificial result?*
- Do you know how many measuring stations can potentially have picked up the event? Have you checked them all to determine everything is as it should be? If just one didn't detect the alleged earthquake or gave a different reading then what would that suggest?
- >>> *Do you understand that an earthquake can happen but little to no actual damage or loss of life can result?* <<<
- Do you realise that even if an earthquake really did happen that the damage we were shown can still have come from other (genuine) events and that the purported loss of life and injuries be vastly exaggerated?
- >>> *If just one (let alone several!) of the photos and videos purporting to be from the "Nepal earthquake" had been doctored then why would you think the seismological data (if it exists as you assume it does) cannot have also been doctored?* <<<
- Haven't you more simply used your "natural intelligence" (!!!) to trap yourself into believing *it must have been real because you can imagine that "seismological equipment all over the world got triggered"? Do you acknowledge that *at least some* of the purported "aftermath" footage has been doctored? _Or do you assert that all of it is genuine?!_
- Given the bizarre things you have had to say about the "ISS" *I'm pretty sure you have not looked into this event at all* and are just assuming it must be real because: _"Why would the television lie to 'MomoTheBellyDancer'?"!!_
- __________________________________________
- Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
- https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
- Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
- Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
- https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
- Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
