Aldiode

under construction

THE ALDIODE
===========

This is a theory of supreme qualities that precede rationality and thus precede both physics and metaphysics. The theory is situated in a three-dimensional metaphysical space. The axes of the space are:

X denotes epistemological value as a quantity
Y denotes ontological value as a quantity
Z denotes introversion when false (-1) and extroversion when true (1).



Supreme quality 0: Identity
---------------------------

Let e be a free variable denoting an event, that is, a pattern of static value.
Let n(e) output the quantity of e as a number.
Let N(e) output all objects that qualify as e.



Supreme quality 1: Otherness
----------------------------

Let all e have coordinates of the form of the ordered set (X,Y,Z) whose members are natural numbers so that:
	|X| < 5,
	|Y| < 5,
	|Z| < 2,
	Z ≠ 0.
Let S(e) be an experience of the Self and R(e) be an experience of another.
If the coordinates of S(e) are (X,Y,Z) the coordinates of R(e) are (-X,-Y,-Z).

	Otherness is symmetrical. Quantity of moral value is preserved.



Supreme quality 2: Sex
----------------------

Let P be a free variable denoting a person.
Let f be a free variable denoting a female.
Let m be a free variable denoting a male.
Let v(e) output the quality of e as quantity v.



Supreme quality 3: Gender
-------------------------

Let c be a free variable denoting a context. Any c is a function.
Let c(e) output e in the context of c so that the output is an object.
Let f(e) output e in the context of manifesting femininity.
Let F(e) output e in the context of experiencing femininity.
Let m(e) output e in the context of manifesting masculinity.
Let M(e) output e in the context of experiencing masculinity.
v(f(e)) = -v(m(e))



Supreme quality 3: Love
-----------------------

The quantity of men is n(m).
All men are N(m).
All contexts are N(c).
Let n(M(c)) mean the quantity of masculine contexts.
Let n(M) mean the quantity of masculine selves so that n(M) = min(n(M(c)),n(N(m))).
	Women are supposed to love men as masculine selves.
If n(M(c)) = 1 then rationality isn't necessary for virtue if virtue is possible in the culture.

The quantity of women is n(f).
All women are N(f).
Let n(F) mean the quantity of feminine selves so that n(F) = n(f) + n(m).

Let A(p) output the absolute value of p as a number.
Let L(p) output the subjective value of p as a number.
	The input of L(p) is P(e) so that P is a person experiencing event e.
	P may be substituted by f to examine e as a manifestation of femininity.
	P may be substituted by F to examine e as an experience of femininity.
	P may be substituted by m to examine e as a manifestation of masculinity.
	P may be substituted by M to examine e as an experience of masculinity.
Let p → q mean the consequence of p.



Supreme principles
------------------

Survival: For each event e so that M(e) → (L(F(e)) > 0), if f is odd and f < m then L(E) = -A(E).
Homogeny: For each event e


if other man is in feminine other's domain then everything he does is minus for male self


Principle of survival:
Principle of homogeny: For each event e so that M(e) → (L(F(e)) > 0),

Principle of homogeny: For each event E so that E = C(M(p)),

if f is odd and f < m then

If f is odd and f < m then L(A(x)) = -A(x) for each event E caused by another man

If the number of effective declarations of the form OF(p) is odd then L(A(x)) = -A(x) for each event caused by OM(p).
The effect of the above rule decrease
This definition of love is intended as descriptive, not as normative.



Hypothetical imperative : Pure evil involves a man behaving like a woman.
Hypothetical alleviation: This doesn't apply to men who are genetically predisposed towards liking trigonometry.
Hypothetical explanation: Pure evil decreases cultural cohesion unless countered by Dynamic Quality. That is to mean, exceptions to the identity of pure evil are unpredictable.



Inductive hypothesis: Rational understanding of any metaphysical attribute besides these two decreases the value of the feminine self for women.

Conjecture of normative masculinity: For men, the metaphysical sets on the masculine Y axes are defined as extroverted manifestations of the feminine self.

Conjecture of normative femininity: For women, the metaphysical sets on the feminine Y axes are defined as introverted manifestations of the masculine self.

Empirical hypothesis: Understanding metaphysics may cause the attainment of a more valuable feminine self for a man than what is available for any woman. Such understanding can only manifest as Dynamic Quality for those who are ignorant of it.

Taxonomic declaration: These attributes are metaphysical in the sense of belonging to a domain that is the successor of physics. But they aren't properly metaphysical because women can understand them. Therefore they are transcendental but it's more aesthetic to call them supreme.