Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Greg Malivuk
- http://www.pastebin.com/u/gmalivuk
- ---
- TOEFL iBT Writing Sample Responses - p. 9 “Task 2”
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship.
- Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
- ---
- If you disagree, you could attack “always”, “most”, or “any”.
- not always: times when it’s not the most important
- not most: other things that are more important than telling the truth
- not “any”: relationships where it’s not so important to tell the truth
- If you agree, you have to support “always”, “most”, and “any”
- always: there are no times when it’s okay to lie
- most: nothing else is more important
- “any”: there is no kind of relationship where it’s not the most important thing
- For both, you need to anticipate some of the ideas someone with the opposite opinion might use.
- ---
- p. 14 - Level 2 Response 2 - What problems do you see with this response?
- - Starts by answering the question without any introduction (I can’t tell what the question is)
- - poor grammar makes it hard to understand the writer’s ideas
- - trial example doesn’t support the importance of telling the truth in a relationship (the problem if you don’t tell your lawyer the truth is that the other side might win the case, it’s not a problem with your relationship with your lawyer)
- - second example is relevant, but very badly written
- - “conclusion” is one sentence and doesn’t really make it clear how the person answers the original question
- (When you write or speak on the TOEFL, pick one answer and make sure it’s clear.)
- ---
- p. 12 - Level 3 Response 1 (a 3.0 average writing level is 20 points on the writing section)
- good things
- - It’s clear that this person agrees with the statement.
- - The three reasons for their opinion are clear in the introduction.
- - The conclusion starts with a restatement of the main idea and reasons.
- bad things
- - The third paragraph doesn’t make it clear that this is the third reason for the writer’s opinion.
- - Some bad grammar and word choice (“perdure” should be “endure”)
- - The third reason in the introduction is not clearly related to the third supporting paragraph. (Nothing in the paragraph talks about a relationship enduring.)
- - The conclusion is too short, and changes the third reason from enduring to not being betrayed.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment