(11:28:28 PM) Mark Chang: a. ho is so dumb
(11:28:28 PM) Mark Chang: a. ho is so dumb
(11:28:30 PM) Mark Chang: 65%=
(11:28:31 PM) Mark Chang: haha
(11:38:11 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: what?
(11:38:33 PM) Mark Chang: andrew ho
(11:38:35 PM) Mark Chang: dumb
(11:38:39 PM) Mark Chang: status
(11:38:38 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: good one
(11:39:21 PM) Mark Chang: wow did u turn into one of andrew ho's disciples or sth?
(11:39:23 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: no
(11:39:25 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i just know he
(11:39:28 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 's not stupid
(11:39:55 PM) Mark Chang: i know he is
(11:40:04 PM) Mark Chang: 1. his philosophy is hella messed up
(11:40:22 PM) Mark Chang: 2. he confronts ppl who might beat him up, and get em mad enough
(11:40:41 PM) Mark Chang: 3. he isnt even that smart.. he won no awards in math club last year
(11:40:57 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: math club =/= smart
(11:41:07 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: philosophy is based on opinion
(11:41:19 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: getting people mad by supporting your views with evidence isn't anything wrong
(11:41:45 PM) Mark Chang: math club - it does show how creative u are
(11:42:00 PM) Mark Chang: philosophy, his views are esoteric and offensive
(11:42:06 PM) Mark Chang: getting people mad. know when to stop
(11:42:20 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: do you know what esoteric means
(11:42:32 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: math is not 'creative'
(11:42:35 PM) Mark Chang: like diff. from others
(11:42:34 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you get a set of rules
(11:42:40 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: no
(11:42:46 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: esoteric - 3 dictionary resultses·o·ter·ic   [es-uh-ter-ik]  Show IPA–adjective1.understood by or meant for only the select few who havespecial knowledge or interest; recondite: poetry full ofesoteric allusions.
.
(11:42:47 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: esoteric - 3 dictionary resultses·o·ter·ic [es-uh-ter-ik]  Show IPA–adjective1.understood by or meant for only the select few who havespecial knowledge or interest; recondite: poetry full ofesoteric allusions.
.
(11:42:47 PM) Mark Chang: jeremy. thatS cuz u suck at math..
(11:42:54 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you suck at anatomy
(11:42:58 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: that's even worse
(11:43:01 PM) Mark Chang: lol
(11:43:03 PM) Mark Chang: I have an A now
(11:43:10 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i see
(11:43:47 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i think you're using the wrong word
(11:43:55 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i think you mean
(11:43:56 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: radical
(11:44:07 PM) Mark Chang: not radical
(11:44:16 PM) Mark Chang: i mean sth like exclusive, yet offensive
(11:44:16 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: if something is offensive to other people
(11:44:18 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it doesn't matter
(11:44:21 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: like
(11:44:27 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i don't like gay people
(11:44:36 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i'm not going to start liking them
(11:44:41 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: just so that i won't be 'offensive'
(11:45:13 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: supporting your views is what you should do, not reserving them for fear of being 'offensive'
(11:45:19 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i do admit, sometimes he crosses the line
(11:45:21 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: with insults
(11:45:33 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: but i see nothing wrong with supporting your ideology
(11:45:38 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: with rational argument
(11:46:08 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: also math club does not require you to be creative
(11:46:13 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i went in freshman year
(11:46:16 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it was the biggest joke
(11:46:17 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: ever
(11:46:18 PM) Mark Chang: have u won a competition?
(11:46:22 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: no
(11:46:27 PM) Mark Chang: ..
(11:46:31 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: so?
(11:46:35 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you had a B in anatomy
(11:46:39 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: until i helped you
(11:46:43 PM) Mark Chang: cuz wikrent didnt like me?
(11:46:51 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: grading on tests isn't subjective
(11:47:00 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: she could do nothing to stop you from getting a good score
(11:47:12 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: the only thing wrong with her is that she's retarded and can't teach
(11:47:22 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: but we learn everything from the book anyway
(11:47:30 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: so there's not much of a difference
(11:47:33 PM) Mark Chang: uh..
(11:47:48 PM) Mark Chang: she give me 0/5 for the same stuff that Maddie wrote and etc
(11:47:55 PM) Mark Chang: and
(11:47:58 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i'm sure it was 'exactly' the same
(11:48:02 PM) Mark Chang: she wont change wrongly entered grades
(11:48:13 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: what do you mean
(11:48:18 PM) Mark Chang: like fracture- caused by trauma, can be treated with braces
(11:48:31 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: what did she write on it
(11:48:39 PM) Mark Chang: she just marked it wrong
(11:48:45 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: then challenge her
(11:48:52 PM) Mark Chang: i did
(11:48:57 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: did you show her maddie's
(11:48:59 PM) Mark Chang: she said 'no'
(11:49:03 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: and asked her to compare?
(11:49:15 PM) Mark Chang: wow
(11:49:28 PM) Mark Chang: is this coming from a guy who talked to the vice principle about her personalities?
(11:49:31 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: yes
(11:49:35 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: your point?
(11:49:38 PM) Mark Chang: ofcourse i didnt
(11:49:41 PM) Mark Chang: she would hate me more
(11:49:42 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: then stop bitching
(11:49:45 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you had a chance
(11:49:47 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you didn't take it
(11:49:50 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: stop complaining
(11:49:54 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's your fault
(11:49:57 PM) Mark Chang: I did talk to her about the test
(11:50:07 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you had nothing to compare it to
(11:50:10 PM) Mark Chang: she just didnt wanna talk about it
(11:50:16 PM) Mark Chang: ... uh
(11:50:15 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 'didn't want to'
(11:50:28 PM) Mark Chang: i presented the powerpoint on fractures jeremy..
(11:50:33 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: as did i
(11:50:36 PM) Mark Chang: i HAD  a fracture at the time with a BRACE
(11:50:39 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: so?
(11:50:45 PM) Mark Chang: it had been caused by a trauma
(11:50:56 PM) Mark Chang: so i picked those answers
(11:50:59 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 'a trauma'
(11:51:00 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: what
(11:51:17 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: yes, but you didn't have any proof in the book
(11:51:22 PM) Mark Chang: falling to the ground with the wrong angle after jumping
(11:51:32 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's just 'trauma'
(11:51:38 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: not 'a trauma'
(11:51:42 PM) Mark Chang: ... i had a brace on
(11:51:46 PM) Mark Chang: to treat a fracture
(11:51:51 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: so? you could be lying
(11:51:54 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: maybe you got shot
(11:51:55 PM) Mark Chang: so I put - can be treated with a brace
(11:52:02 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: how should she know?
(11:52:08 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you need to show her proof in the book
(11:52:15 PM) Mark Chang: cuz i gave her my x-ray?
(11:52:14 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: or compare it to maddie's
(11:52:21 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: did you bring that up?
(11:52:29 PM) Mark Chang: are u listening to urself?
(11:52:31 PM) Mark Chang: cuz i got shot?

(11:52:35 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: are you blind
(11:52:41 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 'maybe you were lying
(11:52:42 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: '
(11:52:44 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i presented
(11:52:46 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: a scenario
(11:53:00 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: that she would have construed your injury could have been from
(11:53:03 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i didn't say you did
(11:53:15 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: but simply providing a teacher with a personal anecdote
(11:53:18 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: isn't 'proof'
(11:53:19 PM) Mark Chang: I gave her my xray
(11:53:23 PM) Mark Chang: listen
(11:53:26 PM) Mark Chang: i gave her my xray
(11:53:29 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: so?
(11:53:34 PM) Mark Chang: listen
(11:53:38 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i'm reading
(11:53:39 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: not listening
(11:53:44 PM) Mark Chang: i gav her my xray
(11:53:47 PM) Mark Chang: ..
(11:53:52 PM) Mark Chang: r u tryin 2 piss me off?

(11:53:53 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: no
(11:53:58 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: if you were really that worried
(11:54:02 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you should have gone into tutorial
(11:54:04 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: talked to her
(11:54:07 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: if she didn't listen
(11:54:09 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: go to the counselor
(11:54:19 PM) Mark Chang: I did?
(11:54:19 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you should've shown her maddie's test
(11:54:23 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you can't just say
(11:54:34 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 'oh i didn't because i was scared therefore she's in the wrong'
(11:54:40 PM) Mark Chang: and whats ur point of saying ur reading not listening?
(11:54:45 PM) Mark Chang: was that really necessary?
(11:54:48 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i'm reading text on a screen
(11:54:52 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: not listening to your voice
(11:54:58 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: yes, it's an important distinction
(11:55:00 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: to me
(11:55:16 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: my point is
(11:55:31 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: don't complain that she's doing something wrong when you could have done a number of things to fix it
(11:55:36 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: but you didn't because you were too scared
(11:55:55 PM) Mark Chang: put urself in my shoes
(11:56:00 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i am in your shoes
(11:56:08 PM) Mark Chang: I had been picked on in front of the class really loud for no reason
(11:56:14 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: same
(11:56:18 PM) Mark Chang: so thats when i started disliking her
(11:56:18 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: she does that to everyone
(11:56:23 PM) Mark Chang: ...
(11:56:28 PM) Mark Chang: im the only one in my class
(11:56:30 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: if you have a problem
(11:56:33 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: go to the counselor
(11:56:37 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: or ask her
(11:56:42 PM) Mark Chang: and i thought u said "sucking up really works"
(11:56:45 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it does
(11:56:53 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: she doesn't do that anymore
(11:56:55 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: she used to
(11:56:55 PM) Mark Chang: I did go to the counselor
(11:57:00 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: and what did she say?
(11:57:15 PM) Mark Chang: ... we talked about this
(11:57:22 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: as i recall, she wanted a meeting
(11:57:27 PM) Mark Chang: yea
(11:57:33 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you didn't want a meeting because you were scared
(11:57:38 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: so it's not wikrent's fault
(11:57:39 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's your own
(11:58:10 PM) Mark Chang: uhh i thought u agreed with me that wikrent would straightly deny her wrongdoings and hate me more
(11:58:37 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: yes, but at least you could get your points back
(11:58:47 PM) Mark Chang: how?
(11:58:54 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: ..by showing her proof in the boo
(11:58:55 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: k
(11:58:59 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: by showing her maddie's test
(11:59:00 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: etc
(11:59:10 PM) Mark Chang: ok listen.
(11:59:13 PM) Mark Chang: if i did that
(11:59:25 PM) Mark Chang: then my grade would rise a couple of points
(11:59:29 PM) Mark Chang: but is that good in the long run?
(11:59:32 PM) aetwsslol@aol.com: why wouldn't it be
(11:59:49 PM) Mark Chang: no, cuz she would know that I dont like her
(12:00:08 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: why would that affect your grade if she knows that you'll go to the counselor if she purposely cheats you?
(12:00:22 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: she'll give you better grades based solely on the basis of not wanting to get into trouble
(12:00:42 AM) Mark Chang: thats your assumption
(12:00:47 AM) Mark Chang: and this is my assumption
(12:01:01 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: what is your assumption
(12:01:25 AM) Mark Chang: that its not good in the long run cuz she would kno i dont like her and not like me back
(12:01:35 AM) Mark Chang: and no one can be unbiased
(12:01:34 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: why does it matter whether she likes you
(12:01:48 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: she doesn't like anyone except a few people anyway
(12:02:06 AM) Mark Chang: dislike<neutral<like
(12:02:21 AM) Mark Chang: i want wanna be in the hate zone which is worse
(12:02:25 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's not like it'd affect your grade because if she kept giving you bad grades you could just go to the counselor
(12:02:27 AM) Mark Chang: dont*
(12:03:01 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i think you have to make a decision about whether to be treated moderately fairly or be liked
(12:03:07 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i like the fair one better
(12:03:11 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it means a better grade
(12:03:15 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: now i don't know your priorities
(12:03:22 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: but i think you share the same views as me
(12:03:33 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: grades>teacher opinion
(12:03:57 AM) Mark Chang: i judge those about the same
(12:04:07 AM) Mark Chang: like my grade in aplang is terrible
(12:04:08 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: then you have no one to blame but yourself
(12:04:10 AM) Mark Chang: but i like glowacki
(12:04:20 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: then you have no one to blame but yourself
(12:04:26 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you have a choice between a good grade
(12:04:28 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: or getting liked
(12:04:30 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you chose one
(12:04:32 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: stick with it
(12:04:42 AM) Mark Chang: getting liked led to higher grade
(12:04:57 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: no, me helping you on the senses test led to a higher grade
(12:05:08 AM) Mark Chang: ... like .8 percent?
(12:05:20 AM) Mark Chang: its accumulative. i did better later on
(12:05:24 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: cumalative*
(12:05:30 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: because you actually started studying
(12:05:37 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: and getting questions right
(12:05:42 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: instead of getting them wrong
(12:05:49 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: that's why you do better on tests
(12:05:58 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's not like you can write down the right answer
(12:06:04 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: and have her mark it wrong
(12:06:29 AM) Mark Chang: the way i see it, my grade started rising because
(12:06:37 AM) Mark Chang: 1. yes i did start studying a lot more
(12:06:58 AM) Mark Chang: 2. she started liking me because I sacrificed my pride to say "hi" or "good bye"
(12:07:11 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: how did liking you lead to a higher grade?
(12:07:13 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: please elaborate
(12:07:26 AM) Mark Chang: 3. because she liked me, she questioned me less on test questions.
(12:07:35 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: what do you mean 'questioned you less'
(12:08:16 AM) Mark Chang: 4. Lastly, because she didnt hate me in front of everyone else, I stopped hating her. So, I became more motivated to "beat her system"
(12:08:25 AM) Mark Chang: shes always like
(12:08:38 AM) Mark Chang: hey I want more to give u points there
(12:08:58 AM) Mark Chang: honestly, I dont think I changed that much in specificity
(12:09:11 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: doesn't matter what you think, it matters what you wrote down
(12:09:13 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you told me
(12:09:17 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you got a lot more specific
(12:09:18 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: on the final
(12:09:33 AM) Mark Chang: to make sure i beat the system
(12:09:39 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: (12:08:58 AM) Mark Chang: honestly, I dont think I changed that much in specificity
(12:09:47 AM) Mark Chang: so that she would find no hole to criticize me
(12:09:46 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you just contradicted yourself
(12:09:50 AM) Mark Chang: for the final
(12:10:09 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's not her fault if your explanations aren't up to par
(12:10:52 AM) Mark Chang: its her decision whether or not it is
(12:10:59 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: so?
(12:11:10 AM) Mark Chang: SHE decides
(12:11:15 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: so?
(12:11:24 AM) Mark Chang: she can be biased
(12:11:43 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: well then, in the case of yours and maddie's being the same, she was being biased right?
(12:11:55 AM) Mark Chang: sure
(12:11:57 AM) Mark Chang: yea
(12:12:08 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you could have overcome the bias by showing her the two tests
(12:12:11 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: but you didn't
(12:12:17 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: thus, it's your fault
(12:12:42 AM) Mark Chang: thats not overcoming the bias
(12:12:53 AM) Mark Chang: thats arguing for like 3 points
(12:12:55 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: confront her every time
(12:12:58 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: she does something biased
(12:13:08 AM) Mark Chang: I did that for the first quarter
(12:13:10 AM) Mark Chang: so I stopped now
(12:13:17 AM) Mark Chang: cuz the way she treated me stressed me out
(12:13:27 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: so what's your overall point
(12:13:36 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: because i'm seeing contradictions all over the place
(12:13:55 AM) Mark Chang: I dont suck at anatomy because I have an A, which I earned
(12:14:01 AM) Mark Chang: by giving up my pride
(12:14:15 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: and copying my test answers
(12:14:23 AM) Mark Chang: vice versa?
(12:14:30 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: (12:13:55 AM) Mark Chang: I dont suck at anatomy because I have an A, which I earned
(12:14:34 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you didn't earn it
(12:14:37 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: if you copied my answers
(12:14:40 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i already had an A
(12:14:42 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: before the final
(12:14:47 AM) Mark Chang: ok ur answers were like the entire hapter
(12:14:54 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i don't know what hapters means
(12:15:04 AM) Mark Chang: i think u do
(12:15:10 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: no i don't read korean
(12:15:19 AM) Mark Chang: I mean, what else could it be other than "chapter"?
(12:15:38 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i dunno
(12:15:40 AM) Mark Chang: oh, unless u couldn't think of adding a C
(12:15:47 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i couldn't, i'm pretty retarded
(12:15:53 AM) Mark Chang: i can tell
(12:16:12 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: (12:27:39 PM) Mark Chang: dude
(12:27:46 PM) Mark Chang: ur anatomy test questions helped me so much
(12:27:55 PM) Mark Chang: now i have 89.33 in anat
(12:16:23 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 'helped me so much'
(12:16:26 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: contradiction again
(12:16:35 AM) Mark Chang: thats no contradiction
(12:16:47 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: so did my answers help you or not
(12:16:49 AM) Mark Chang: it helped me by telling me what kinda questions I could expect
(12:16:53 AM) Mark Chang: they did
(12:17:01 AM) Mark Chang: i never said they were useless
(12:17:03 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 'ur anatomy test questions'
(12:17:06 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: the QUESTIONS
(12:17:09 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i gave you the exact
(12:17:10 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: QUESTIONS
(12:17:14 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: EXACT QUESTIONS
(12:17:20 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: if that's not cheating
(12:17:22 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i don't know what is
(12:17:28 AM) Mark Chang: she could have changed it
(12:17:30 AM) Mark Chang: and
(12:17:35 AM) Mark Chang: i gave u finals q
(12:17:35 AM) Mark Chang: s
(12:17:37 AM) Mark Chang: so.. lol
(12:17:44 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: she's far too lazy to change it
(12:17:46 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you should know that
(12:17:51 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: and i already had an A before finals
(12:17:57 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you didn't have an a before the senses test
(12:18:02 AM) Mark Chang: 1. that's an assumption
(12:18:17 AM) Mark Chang: 2. u having an A before doesn't matter, cuz for all i know, it couldv dropped to a B
(12:18:28 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's not an assumption, it's a fact
(12:18:30 AM) Mark Chang: 3. well ur sense test didnt make my grade an A
(12:18:56 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it does matter, because i would only have gotten a B if my finals grade was below a C, which couldn't hae happened
(12:19:03 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: yes, but i helped you bring it up
(12:19:09 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: if i hadn't helped you
(12:19:14 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i guarantee you
(12:19:18 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you wouldn't have gotten an A
(12:19:44 AM) Mark Chang: so, does this all make me bad at anatomy?
(12:19:48 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you did not 'earn' your A
(12:19:49 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you copied
(12:19:54 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: and cheated to get an A
(12:20:01 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i would've gotten an A
(12:20:03 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: either way
(12:20:07 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: guaranteed
(12:20:08 AM) Mark Chang: sigh...
(12:20:10 AM) Mark Chang: wow
(12:20:14 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: wow indeed
(12:20:16 AM) Mark Chang: guaranteed?
wheres ur proof
(12:20:20 AM) Mark Chang: that u like so much
(12:20:35 AM) Mark Chang: would have a 0 on the final keep ur A?
(12:20:39 AM) Mark Chang: having*
(12:20:40 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: no of course not
(12:20:46 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i couldn't have gotten that low
(12:20:48 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's not possible
(12:20:50 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's like saying
(12:21:01 AM) Mark Chang: who decides whether or not it's possible or not
(12:21:01 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 'give me proof that you're not going to get shot tomorrow'
(12:21:11 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 'i don't have proof, but i'm pretty sure that won't happen'
(12:21:12 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's like that
(12:21:20 AM) Mark Chang: how does that relate
(12:21:20 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you don't need proof for things this obvious
(12:21:37 AM) Mark Chang: "this obvious" come from your own opinion
(12:21:41 AM) Mark Chang: I mean
(12:21:43 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: no, it comes from common sense
(12:21:50 AM) Mark Chang: u can say, its pretty obvious I wont get shot tomorrow
(12:21:55 AM) Mark Chang: what if u do?
(12:22:06 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you won't, so there's no point bringing it up in the first place
(12:22:21 AM) Mark Chang: haha
(12:22:23 AM) Mark Chang: I mean
(12:22:31 AM) Mark Chang: u can type write now that
(12:22:35 AM) Mark Chang: I wont get shot tomorrow
(12:22:39 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you won't get shot tomorrow
(12:22:40 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: happy?
(12:22:42 AM) Mark Chang: but would that guarantee that you wont?
(12:22:44 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: yes
(12:22:55 AM) Mark Chang: for all you know, I myself can find a gun
(12:22:56 AM) Mark Chang: and shoot
(12:23:03 AM) Mark Chang: are u atheist?
(12:23:08 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: nope
(12:23:16 AM) Mark Chang: Christian
(12:23:16 AM) Mark Chang: ?
(12:23:16 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: well then, shoot yourself
(12:23:21 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: but i know that's not going to happen
(12:23:23 AM) Mark Chang: see
(12:23:27 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: so there's no use bringing taht up
(12:23:32 AM) Mark Chang: how do u "know?
(12:23:43 AM) Mark Chang: you don't "know" the future
(12:23:50 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: because it's so unlikely the possibility of it even happening is negligible
(12:23:56 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: one does not walk around scared of being shot
(12:24:14 AM) Mark Chang: but
(12:24:17 AM) Mark Chang: it does happen eh?
(12:24:24 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: no, not to me
(12:24:27 AM) Mark Chang: would they have expected themselves getting shot the day before?
(12:24:33 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i don't know
(12:24:39 AM) Mark Chang: no, cause ur one of the lucky survivors
(12:24:45 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: in that case
(12:24:54 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i can postulate that aliens are going to take over the world in 10 seconds
(12:25:01 AM) Mark Chang: u can
(12:25:03 AM) Mark Chang: and it might
(12:25:06 AM) Mark Chang: how would we know?
(12:25:18 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i know because, again, it's so unlikely the possibility of it even happening is negligible
(12:25:28 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: thus, we're not worried
(12:25:34 AM) Mark Chang: unlikely?
(12:25:40 AM) Mark Chang: u decided that
(12:25:39 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: yes
(12:25:45 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: no, reality
(12:25:46 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: decided that
(12:25:48 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: not me
(12:25:56 AM) Mark Chang: YOUR reality
(12:26:00 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: no, reality, mark
(12:26:04 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i don't have my own world
(12:26:06 AM) Mark Chang: no, jeremy, yours
(12:26:24 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: are you implying that different people live in alternate realities?
(12:26:29 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: if so, there is no use talking to you
(12:26:34 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: your ideology is so messed up
(12:26:36 AM) Mark Chang: its certainly possible
(12:26:44 AM) Mark Chang: well, this is MY ideology
(12:26:44 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: one cannot argue with faith
(12:26:49 AM) Mark Chang: and i think YOURS is messed up
(12:26:53 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: what is my ideology?
(12:26:57 AM) Mark Chang: it has nothing to do with faith
(12:27:13 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you have faith in your reasoning skills
(12:27:14 AM) Mark Chang: that u look down on other people for "cheating" when u urself cheated
(12:27:27 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i didn't cheat to get an A, i cheated to ENSURE an A
(12:27:32 AM) Mark Chang: LOL
(12:27:34 AM) Mark Chang: LOLOLOL
(12:27:37 AM) Mark Chang: whats the difference
(12:27:38 AM) Mark Chang: hahaha
(12:27:41 AM) Mark Chang: that was hella funny
(12:28:05 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: if you can't tell the difference
(12:28:12 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: may the Lord have mercy on your soul
(12:28:16 AM) Mark Chang: hahaha
(12:28:22 AM) Mark Chang: the Lord loves me for all i know
(12:28:23 AM) Mark Chang: haha
(12:28:36 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i don't see how that relates
(12:29:18 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i feel bad for you to have such inferior levels of thought that you can't even derive simple conclusions from common sense
(12:29:25 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: to engage in  such*
(12:29:34 AM) Mark Chang: hahaha
(12:29:37 AM) Mark Chang: who decides
(12:29:38 AM) Mark Chang: simple
(12:29:55 AM) Mark Chang: see? its arrogance from your part
(12:30:14 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's not arrogance, it's a simple realization of my superiority
(12:30:20 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: for all men are not created equal
(12:31:01 AM) Mark Chang: haha
(12:31:07 AM) Mark Chang: hahahahhaha
(12:31:12 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: hahahahahahahhaha
(12:31:22 AM) Mark Chang: if your reasoning skills are so advanced, why do u have a B in calc?
(12:31:45 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 1. i never claimed my reasoning skills are advanced
(12:31:46 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: they aren't
(12:31:50 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: yours are just worse
(12:32:03 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 2. because i made the mistake of not doing anything for the first 3 tests
(12:32:10 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: because i thought it would be as easy as HIAP4
(12:32:15 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: mistake on my part
(12:32:17 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i concede that
(12:32:32 AM) Mark Chang: 1. u called yourself "superior"
(12:33:06 AM) Mark Chang: so u thought ur "reasoning skills" were more superior to mine?
(12:33:05 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: that doesn't imply better reasoning skills...
(12:33:19 AM) Mark Chang: so I said, your calc grade is bad
(12:33:20 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i didn't specify in what field i was superior
(12:33:29 AM) Mark Chang: reasoning skills
(12:33:34 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i didn't say that
(12:33:33 AM) Mark Chang: reasoning skills
(12:33:34 AM) Mark Chang: lol
(12:33:40 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i never said reasoning skills
(12:33:44 AM) Mark Chang: 1. i never claimed my reasoning skills are advanced
they aren't
yours are just worse

(12:33:50 AM) Mark Chang: ?
(12:34:01 AM) Mark Chang: LOL
(12:34:07 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: they're not advanced
(12:34:13 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: they're just better than yours
(12:34:18 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: superior=/= advanced
(12:34:28 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: mayan technology was superior to aztec technology
(12:34:34 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: doesn't mean they were advance
(12:34:35 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: d
(12:34:43 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: they were both rudimentary
(12:34:50 AM) Mark Chang: mayan technology was superior to the aztec technology
(12:35:09 AM) Mark Chang: therefore, mayan technology was more advanced than the aztec technology
(12:35:10 AM) Mark Chang: DUH
(12:35:37 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: yes, exactly, more advanced COMPARED to the aztec technology
(12:35:47 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: andrew ho is more advanced COMPARED to me
(12:35:47 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: in math
(12:35:50 AM) Mark Chang: EXACTLY!
(12:35:53 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: but not advanced in any means
(12:35:56 AM) Mark Chang: u said
(12:36:08 AM) Mark Chang: your reasoning skills were superior to MINE
(12:36:20 AM) Mark Chang: so i claimed that your math grade is lower
(12:36:30 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: yes, that's correct: my reasoning skills are more advanced than yours, but they're not advanced compared with other people's
(12:36:44 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: math is not the only field where reasoning is employed
(12:36:48 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: also, i already explained
(12:36:50 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: why i have a B
(12:36:56 AM) Mark Chang: it is employed
(12:36:55 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: so i don't know why you're bringing this up
(12:37:01 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's not THE ONLY ONE
(12:37:06 AM) Mark Chang: tell me, WHY do u have a B
(12:37:20 AM) Mark Chang: secondly, if your reasonning skills are superior to mine
(12:37:28 AM) Mark Chang: then how come your math grade is inferior to mine
(12:37:27 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i'm not going to retype it
(12:37:30 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: look back
(12:37:45 AM) Mark Chang: u said HIAP4 is easy, calc is not
(12:37:50 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: (12:32:03 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 2. because i made the mistake of not doing anything for the first 3 tests
(12:32:10 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: because i thought it would be as easy as HIAP4
(12:32:15 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: mistake on my part
(12:32:17 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i concede that
(12:37:58 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's not as easy AS HIAP4
(12:38:03 AM) Mark Chang: well, i find both easy
(12:38:07 AM) Mark Chang: haha
(12:38:27 AM) Mark Chang: HIAP4 is not as easy as calc and your grade in calc is a B
(12:38:33 AM) Mark Chang: therefore, u find calc hard i assume?
(12:38:41 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: are you fucking blind: (12:32:03 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 2. because i made the mistake of not doing anything for the first 3 tests
(12:38:49 AM) Mark Chang: hahhaa
(12:38:53 AM) Mark Chang: NEITHER DID I
(12:38:52 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: BECAUSE I MADE THE MISTAKE OF NOT DOING ANYTHING FOR THE FIRST THREE TEST
(12:38:54 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: S
(12:39:01 AM) Mark Chang: i never opened a single page
(12:39:05 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: ok, you're better than calc than me
(12:39:05 AM) Mark Chang: before a test
(12:39:14 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: doesn't mean your reasoning skills are better
(12:39:19 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it just means
(12:39:24 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: your mathematical reasoning skills are better
(12:39:31 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: not your general reasoning skills
(12:39:51 AM) Mark Chang: u need general reasoning skills to do math
(12:39:56 AM) Mark Chang: i mean, how would u know/
(12:40:01 AM) Mark Chang: u'v never been good at it
(12:40:05 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: no, you need mathematical reasoning skills
(12:40:07 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you dumbshit
(12:40:11 AM) Mark Chang: hahhaa
(12:40:11 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: there's a difference
(12:40:20 AM) Mark Chang: says the boy who has a B in calc
(12:40:26 AM) Mark Chang: what an excuse
(12:40:27 AM) Mark Chang: LOL
(12:40:41 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: says the boy who sucked at stats
(12:40:42 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: LOL
(12:40:46 AM) Mark Chang: haha
(12:40:47 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you're so ignorant
(12:40:52 AM) Mark Chang: well, you are better than me stats
(12:40:53 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's a waste of time talking to you
(12:40:53 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: bye
 (12:40:58 AM) Mark Chang: but I got A's both semesters
(12:40:59 AM) Mark Chang: 5 for AP
(12:32:32 AM) Mark Chang: 1. u called yourself "superior"
(12:33:06 AM) Mark Chang: so u thought ur "reasoning skills" were more superior to mine?
(12:33:07 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: that doesn't imply better reasoning skills...
(12:33:19 AM) Mark Chang: so I said, your calc grade is bad
(12:33:22 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i didn't specify in what field i was superior
(12:33:29 AM) Mark Chang: reasoning skills
(12:33:33 AM) Mark Chang: reasoning skills
(12:33:34 AM) Mark Chang: lol
(12:33:35 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i didn't say that
(12:33:41 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i never said reasoning skills
(12:33:44 AM) Mark Chang: 1. i never claimed my reasoning skills are advanced
they aren't
yours are just worse

(12:33:50 AM) Mark Chang: ?
(12:34:01 AM) Mark Chang: LOL
(12:34:09 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: they're not advanced
(12:34:14 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: they're just better than yours
(12:34:19 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: superior=/= advanced
(12:34:29 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: mayan technology was superior to aztec technology
(12:34:35 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: doesn't mean they were advance
(12:34:36 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: d
(12:34:44 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: they were both rudimentary
(12:34:50 AM) Mark Chang: mayan technology was superior to the aztec technology
(12:35:09 AM) Mark Chang: therefore, mayan technology was more advanced than the aztec technology
(12:35:10 AM) Mark Chang: DUH
(12:35:39 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: yes, exactly, more advanced COMPARED to the aztec technology
(12:35:48 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: andrew ho is more advanced COMPARED to me
(12:35:49 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: in math
(12:35:50 AM) Mark Chang: EXACTLY!
(12:35:55 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: but not advanced in any means
(12:35:56 AM) Mark Chang: u said
(12:36:08 AM) Mark Chang: your reasoning skills were superior to MINE
(12:36:20 AM) Mark Chang: so i claimed that your math grade is lower
(12:36:31 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: yes, that's correct: my reasoning skills are more advanced than yours, but they're not advanced compared with other people's
(12:36:45 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: math is not the only field where reasoning is employed
(12:36:49 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: also, i already explained
(12:36:52 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: why i have a B
(12:36:56 AM) Mark Chang: it is employed
(12:36:56 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: so i don't know why you're bringing this up
(12:37:03 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's not THE ONLY ONE
(12:37:06 AM) Mark Chang: tell me, WHY do u have a B
(12:37:20 AM) Mark Chang: secondly, if your reasonning skills are superior to mine
(12:37:28 AM) Mark Chang: then how come your math grade is inferior to mine
(12:37:28 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i'm not going to retype it
(12:37:31 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: look back
(12:37:45 AM) Mark Chang: u said HIAP4 is easy, calc is not
(12:37:52 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: (12:32:03 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 2. because i made the mistake of not doing anything for the first 3 tests
(12:32:10 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: because i thought it would be as easy as HIAP4
(12:32:15 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: mistake on my part
(12:32:17 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: i concede that
(12:37:59 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's not as easy AS HIAP4
(12:38:03 AM) Mark Chang: well, i find both easy
(12:38:07 AM) Mark Chang: haha
(12:38:27 AM) Mark Chang: HIAP4 is not as easy as calc and your grade in calc is a B
(12:38:33 AM) Mark Chang: therefore, u find calc hard i assume?
(12:38:43 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: are you fucking blind: (12:32:03 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: 2. because i made the mistake of not doing anything for the first 3 tests
(12:38:49 AM) Mark Chang: hahhaa
(12:38:53 AM) Mark Chang: NEITHER DID I
(12:38:53 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: BECAUSE I MADE THE MISTAKE OF NOT DOING ANYTHING FOR THE FIRST THREE TEST
(12:38:55 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: S
(12:39:01 AM) Mark Chang: i never opened a single page
(12:39:05 AM) Mark Chang: before a test
(12:39:06 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: ok, you're better than calc than me
(12:39:15 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: doesn't mean your reasoning skills are better
(12:39:20 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it just means
(12:39:25 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: your mathematical reasoning skills are better
(12:39:33 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: not your general reasoning skills
(12:39:51 AM) Mark Chang: u need general reasoning skills to do math
(12:39:56 AM) Mark Chang: i mean, how would u know/
(12:40:01 AM) Mark Chang: u'v never been good at it
(12:40:06 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: no, you need mathematical reasoning skills
(12:40:08 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you dumbshit
(12:40:11 AM) Mark Chang: hahhaa
(12:40:12 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: there's a difference
(12:40:20 AM) Mark Chang: says the boy who has a B in calc
(12:40:26 AM) Mark Chang: what an excuse
(12:40:27 AM) Mark Chang: LOL
(12:40:42 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: says the boy who sucked at stats
(12:40:43 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: LOL
(12:40:46 AM) Mark Chang: haha
(12:40:48 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: you're so ignorant
(12:40:52 AM) Mark Chang: well, you are better than me stats
(12:40:54 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: it's a waste of time talking to you
(12:40:55 AM) aetwsslol@aol.com: bye
(12:40:58 AM) Mark Chang: but I got A's both semesters
(12:40:59 AM) Mark Chang: 5 for AP