[17:44:32] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] Your default channel has been changed to sol
[17:44:32] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <Azumarill> lyle
[17:44:37] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SirLyle> wat
[17:44:59] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <Azumarill> someone is trying to tell me that that wood grinder design is not good
[17:45:07] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <Azumarill> as in, against rules
[17:45:18] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SirLyle> wood grinder?
[17:45:25] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SirLyle> oh the one we always build?
[17:45:52] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <pez252> Should build a wither based one and modreq a mob damage region
[17:46:02] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SirLyle> which rule does it supposedly break
[17:46:19] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SwitchViewz> Considering a padmin (me) designed and shrunk it, and usually always builds one each rev, I would
[17:46:25] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SwitchViewz> say that means its probably not against the rules
[17:46:30] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <Azumarill> no the, the wooden iron golem grinder
[17:46:33] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <Azumarill> on solace planning
[17:46:41] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SirLyle> which rule does it break?
[17:46:56] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] * SwitchViewz has no idea which one were talking about now
[17:47:07] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <Azumarill> Switch: are the spawner placement restrictions from this post still in place? https://redd.it/3zt
[17:47:17] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <Azumarill> the stuff about a minimum distance apart and from the walls
[17:47:24] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SirLyle> i.e. can you just stack the spawners on top of each other
[17:47:32] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SwitchViewz> well thats a bad url
[17:47:36] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <Azumarill> f
[17:47:37] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SwitchViewz> but assuming it goes wehre I think it goes
[17:47:38] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SwitchViewz> then yes
[17:47:43] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <Azumarill> https://redd.it/3ztiok
[17:48:01] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SirLyle> pretty sure drt said bobdole's just stacks them
[17:48:08] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SwitchViewz> yes its all the same, but some people stack them
[17:48:19] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SwitchViewz> dunno if that actualyl causes problems or not
[17:48:30] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <Azumarill> wait so is it okay to set it up that way or not
[17:48:35] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SirLyle> yeah, those placements were silver trying to give grinder building advice at the same tiem she ma
[17:48:38] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SirLyle> made the rules
[17:48:55] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SwitchViewz> I don't know, some people do, but I don't know if that effects output, I haven't done
[17:48:57] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SwitchViewz> a comparison test
[17:49:02] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SirLyle> because nerd doesn';t know how to write clear rules
[17:49:39] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <Azumarill> I'm asking if it's legal, not if it would work
[17:50:03] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SwitchViewz> oh yes its legal
[17:50:18] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <Azumarill> to get them adjacent
[17:50:31] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <SwitchViewz> yes if you want
[17:50:35] [Client thread/INFO]: [CHAT] [sol] <pez252> I think any placement is OK