API tools faq
paste
Lesta

22 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-12-29 0325 +Surfpurzel

Lesta
Dec 28th, 2016
116
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 8.62 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-12-29 0325 +Surfpurzel
  2. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/ZGKK2WqqDLv
  3. https://pastebin.com/hwZ9tRHM
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Surfpurzel __ When nothing presented stands up to scrutiny it is natural to feel that it could be fake.
  7.  
  8. I examined the alleged "Nepal earthquake" closely - far closer than you and most other people. *Everything that was offered as proof could be reasonably doubted*. That STUNNED me. It should have stunned you also.
  9.  
  10. When looking at the footage I really did get a sinking feeling that it could be fake. *Not that earthquakes are fake you f_kcing spastic* - but that what was reported about the "Nepal earthquake" of 2015 could have been.
  11.  
  12. Have you already forgotten about that guy who called himself "Bill Purkayastha" (he would on occasion White Knight for you) when he posted a video showing alleged "Nepal earthquake damage" but it came from a completely different event?
  13.  
  14. I posted a video about that which can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRVFGjXO--E
  15.  
  16. I know you'd like me to take down my videos like that but it's not going to happen. It is unlisted though - _as are most of my videos_ - and in part that's because my thinking has advanced significantly on almost everything *_and I did fall for some traps_*.
  17.  
  18. __
  19.  
  20. As it happens - the highly active and virulent flat Earth disinformation campaign came about in a way much like the "Nepal earthquake" did in that *weak* and *flawed* proofs for the "ball Earth" were offered *so that those in the "truth community" could be led into thinking _"hang on - perhaps the Earth is flat after all!"_*.
  21.  
  22. (Just as people in the "truth community" would look at the "Nepal earthquake" and think "hang on - perhaps it never happened!")
  23.  
  24. That's why I made those videos saying "this is not proof of a ball Earth". Not because I advocated for the flat Earth but because what was offered as proof wasn't *really* proof of a ball Earth. (The "ship over the horizon" videos back then were flawed with the camera being progressively lowered! etc.)
  25.  
  26. The "truth community" has had the "fallacy of the conspiracy theorist" pushed onto it HARD ever since the time of "TransAsia". Yes - I was affected by the fallacy but soon realised the thinking error *and eliminated it by the end of 2015* whereas most other people did not.
  27.  
  28. __
  29.  
  30. I certainly *felt* that the alleged "Nepal earthquake" *could have been faked* (at least partially) and I realised as I examined the event that in the future an earthquake *could be faked* and the population would accept it as real *because it has been trained to accept proof's appearances in place of actual proof*.
  31.  
  32. The realisation of this danger is what motivated me to describe the lie system as I began to perceive it (now free from the former thinking errors) *because the only way to protect against such an ingenious method of lying [that's always successful enough] is to be aware of how it is being done*.
  33.  
  34. 2015 was the year when I figured out the lie system and its methodology. _And it was no thanks to you or anyone else_. When I started out I thought everyone was on the same side - _hah!_ I have had to fight tooth and nail the entire way. Again - it has been no thanks to you or people like you.
  35.  
  36. The "Nepal earthquake" was one of the last events I looked at before I realised that *the lie system is deliberately presenting events and claims in the same form that a lie would need to take*. It is intentionally and systematically withholding "sufficient proof".
  37.  
  38. When truth is routinely presented in the same form that a lie would need to take *then lies will be accepted as truth when they are presented as truth in this same special way*.
  39.  
  40. That's the danger I have been trying to warn people about and I don't think more than two people have grasped it!
  41.  
  42. The lie system needs to do this on a consistent basis (otherwise it undermines its voodoo) - *and that is why a natural disaster like the "Nepal earthquake"* (surely the most provably thing in the world!) *was presented to us in the way that it was* (i.e., without "sufficient proof" and thus remained doubtable by intelligent people).
  43.  
  44. Because of the way events are routinely presented it becomes possible for "hoaxtards" (agents of disinformation AND good people alike) to cry "hoax". It's not because everything is a hoax - but because instinctively "hoaxtards" (as you call them) realise that nothing is ever being *genuinely proven* with (so-termed) "sufficient proof".
  45.  
  46. *However - "hoaxtards" commit the fallacy of the conspiracy theorist and conclude that an event must be fake _otherwise it would be proven real_*. (Which is a tempting but *incorrect conclusion*.)
  47.  
  48. During the alleged "Nepal earthquake" I certainly did my best to bait people into conversation by posting videos and opening up comments with "positive statements" (i.e., assertions) about the event being fake or "controlled demolition". This was done to get the response: _"Lesta you're wrong and here's why!"_ because that would then give me an opportunity to point out the *flaw* in their analysis.
  49.  
  50. But this "confrontational strategy" was one that went over most people's heads and I have largely abandoned it because it isn't effective. It creates more problems than it solves.
  51.  
  52. *For these reasons - if I were able to go back in time (with the awareness and understanding that I have today) I would have done things completely differently*.
  53.  
  54. Back then - and it pains me to write this - "Dave Johnson" was still an influence that I hadn't yet shaken free from! Though I managed to do that when he started up with his bullsh!t about "Tony Abbott" and "Tony Blair" being the "same person" and his ridiculous "flat Earth proofs". (For me to write someone off completely I needed to prove that the person did not believe their own assertions and was actively seeking to impress falsehoods onto the minds of vulnerable people.)
  55.  
  56. It also pains me to say that the language I used when describing events back then [in 2015] was very much influenced by people like "Dave Johnson" (and "Jeff C"). "Hoax", "controlled demolition" etc. were terms I picked up and repeated due to being influenced by more established members of the "truth community".
  57.  
  58. Keep in mind that I had at the time only been active in the "truth community" for a few months! I had to eventually break away from those people and start from scratch - and I did that by introducing my own terminology as I went about solving the problem.
  59.  
  60. And all of this has gone over the heads of those who hate on me. *Those who hate on me tend to be "literal thinkers"* (in a way they are not unlike people who cannot detect sarcasm in writing). Such people cannot understand that saying "X is BS" does not necessarily mean I believe "X is BS" - *but is instead a way to get a conversation started where the other person can try to prove X isn't BS and fail in the attempt*. (Again - this "confrontational strategy" turned out to be ineffective because I later came to realise each person is trapped by their own pre-existing belief bias.)
  61.  
  62. __
  63.  
  64. I have in recent days written a couple of posts that describe the way people like you operate. What you do is cling to statements of the past because it was easy to attack me back then *when I was still new and figuring out the problem of the lie system*.
  65.  
  66. Now that I have done just that and moved on none of the haters can go near me *today* and they need to keep digging up the past. As though everyone should go back to living in 2015!
  67.  
  68. For what it's worth - you are one of the last people who deserves ANY of my time and energy and you should be grateful to be given even this much of a reply (though as a *black-hearted psychopath* you aren't capable of gratitude).
  69.  
  70. Going forward I will be less inclined to make the effort. *I have now left you and everyone else in the dust*. I have long since moved on from those wretched "Nepal earthquake" days of 2015 which was now more than 18 months ago.
  71.  
  72. I alone identified the problem. I alone outlined it. And I alone have described its solutions. It's now up to you and the others (haters included) to catch up with Lesta or continue playing games that go nowhere in your worthless little "truther sandpit".
  73.  
  74.  
  75. ______________________________________________________________
  76. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  77.  
  78. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  79. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
  80.  
  81. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  82. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  83.  
  84. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  85. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  86.  
  87. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  88. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  89.  
  90. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  91. What exists - exists to always exist.
  92. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!