7 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-25 2205 +Brian Hill

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-25 2205 +Brian Hill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOnpUIWf12g&lc=z13wtnybyvbewl1bq04cdz5wjknqu1iwjck
https://pastebin.com/hnkn2eSg
__

+Brian Hill __ I am way behind on this thread and am still not in a position to reply meaningfully. I will need to return here. For the moment - perhaps I can succinctly explain why "lie system" is an appropriate term and what exactly a "fatal mistake" is and why none has ever been seen.







Let us suppose that the alleged "ISS" is not real and manned therefore all purported "ISS interviews" are necessarily faked. There is only one possible "fatal mistake" that could be made *and that is to see someone or something behave as though under gravity*. To see "green screen" is not enough because you can still have a green-screen setup on an "ISS"! And to have an alleged "astronaut" admit it is all being faked *is not* sufficient proof either - for he can always be *lying or mistaken*.







However - to see an object behave with gravity while it is officially supposed to be aboard the "ISS" would be recognisable and undeniable to "normal people" (for example - to see an "astronaut" juggling). Seeing such footage (and it must be officially asserted as "real" and not later some "April Fools' joke") would mean it is categorically fake. That would represent a "fatal mistake".







Therefore a "fatal mistake" must be something that is *impossible* to the claim itself. The claim about the "ISS" is that it's a permanent micro/zero-gravity environment and so to see someone or something under the influence of gravity means it cannot be in micro/zero-gravity. If it is being officially asserted it/they are - then it cannot be "reality".







That is also why I pointed out that with the alleged "Paris Attack" example - a "fatal mistake" would be to *SHOW the FACE of the alleged "bomber" receiving CPR* and then later to show *the SAME person purportedly blowing himself up*. This would be impossible! That could have no plausible explanation. That would be something every "normal person" recognised and accepts as being impossible. So long as both videos are being officially asserted as genuine (and it's not an "April Fools' joke") then it would represent a "fatal mistake".







Everything else about that "Paris Attack" video - in a sense - is like an "astronaut" admitting that the "ISS is fake". That is to say - a witness can say anything - even that which is not true. A news outlet can report anything - even that which is not true. A "witness" can be *lying* or *mistaken* and a "plausible explanation *invented*.







Remember - with the alleged "Paris Attack" *we did not see the face of the person receiving CPR* and the news article included the *wiggle words* i.e., _"believed to be the suicide bomber"_. We can always be told later that this information was wrong! There is wiggle room! We have the *appearances of a contradiction* but not quite! We can always be told later the "witness" lied. And we certainly did not see any "wires" on the gentleman appearing to receive CPR.







There can be no plausible explanation for an "astronaut" juggling on the "ISS" and there can be no plausible explanation to *show* the alleged bomber receiving CPR *and also* blowing himself up. These would be fatal mistakes. We have no expectation of ever seeing them because the lie system is very good at what it does and has no interest in getting caught.







Such fatal mistakes would lead the entire population to accept events are fabricated and that they really are being lied to by "charming scumbags" and there would be rioting in the streets the next morning if not the very same evening.







__







As to the term "lie system". I've written a lot (more than I intended) so I'll try to keep this brief.







As simply as possible: we are in a system that is *intentionally and systematically withholding "sufficient proof" from us.* It does this for truthful events and must necessarily do this for fabricated events. We are being presented with truth *in the same form that a lie would need to take*. That is to say: a lie cannot ever come with "sufficient proof"! (For if it could it would not be a lie!)







That is why the concept of "sufficient proof" is so important and it is fundamental to understanding the "lie system". The lie system is a SYSTEM that makes LYING to entire populations possible - should there be a need! When events and claims are presented to the audience without sufficient proof the audience's imagination is forced to fill in the blanks. The unwitting audience then convinces itself that an event or claim is true and real (or not true and real).







The consequence of the lie system is that *lies can be presented as truth and the population is never the wiser*. (I am typing very quickly! I am likely not explaining this well and I need to write more on this and the concept of a "fatal mistake" - but I have set out the basics.)







I am way behind on so many things and I need more time to return to this thread. You have written a lot and I need to go through it properly. For now all I can do is apologise! (It has taken me two weeks just to find my way back to this thread - and I am still not in a position to respond to your points properly - again, I apologise!)

______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.