Commentary on the the origin of the Israelites

The true history of Israel is too much to properly explain here. See my article http://montalk.net/conspiracy/283 for the context of how it came into existence. I'll give you an overview below though.

The original Israelites were a confederation of Semitic and Indo-European tribes associated with the exiled Hyksos dynasty from Egypt. The Hyksos were Indo-European elites ruling over a Semitic nomadic underclass who came to power in Lower Egypt (northern part) after the country was hit with mass migrations and disaster following the Thera eruption in 1628 B.C. The Hyksos remained in power until 1550 when Lower Egypt waged a successful military campaign to drive them out.

The Hyksos elite were Indo-Europeans associated with the white Libyans to the West of Egypt, the Minoan/Mycenaean/Achaeans to the North, and more primarily Hittites and Akkadians to the North East. The Semites came from the Mesopotamians and Canaanites, who were civilized and conquered millennia earlier by proto-Indo-European colonists from the Black Sea region. Semites had been populating northern Egypt since the third millennium B.C., driven into Egypt by various natural disasters over the centuries.

When the Hyksos and their followers were exiled in 1550 B.C., they plundered their way north (that's where the story of the fall of Jericho came from) into the Levant and settled in their ancestral homelands which is modern day Lebanon. The Semites got the southern areas since those were their homelands. Later after the followers of Akhenaten were exiled, they joined their kin  (descendants of the Hyksos exiles) in those same areas. Thus you had roughly ten Indo-European tribes of "Israel" in the north, and two Semitic tribes of "Israel" in the south.

When the Old Testament speaks of the splendor and wealth of Solomon and Israel, historically that's referring to the time period around 1500 B.C. where the Hyksos had re-established themselves and teamed up with their brothers the Phoenicians. Together they became the top dogs of the Bronze Age empire. The foundation stones of the temple at Baalbek are remnant of that time period. The Old Testament as we know it today has a falsified version of history placing these events around 1000 B.C. and roughly 100km to the south (Jerusalem was not the capitol of the original Israel).

The northern tribes were Asherah/Ashtar/Baal worshippers and had many practices in common with the later Celts / druids who were one of their descendants. Human sacrifice by burning is an example, as is worship practices in sacred forest groves. The Semites (of which the Medianites were part) were Yahweh/Jehovah worshippers.  But both, prior and during their various exiles from Egypt, were in contact with the alien technology operative there in the Nile Delta within and around the Great Pyramid. I suspect that what they called the Lord of Israel was actually a demon or negative alien faction using them as pawns and manifesting or communicating via the Ark of the Covenant (or rather what it contained) that they stole from Egypt. So Judaism and hence Christianity and Islam are really just cargo cults sparked off by leftover alien or Atlantean technology.

So in ~750 B.C. the Assyrians conquered the Levant and eventually allowed the Semites to stay (tribe of Judah and Benjamin) while the ten northern tribes, as we all know, were scattered to the winds or "lost". Really the latter just picked up their stuff and migrated to Northern India (the ancient Indo-Europeans had colonies in the Indus Valley and the region was known to them). The remaining Semites eventually became the Jews. They rewrote history putting the northern kingdoms in a bad light, and transposed their history from 1500 B.C. onto their own fictional history set around 1,000 B.C. (close to the 480 year period between the Exodus and construction of Solomon's temple. In truth the period was only 50 years -- 1550 B.C to 1500 B.C. So the 480 year period is a bunch of B.S. to distance their fictional history from the original events they plagiarized).

Today, there are descendants of Poles, Germans, and Khazarians calling themselves Jews but they are not the "Semitic Hebrews of the Old Testament to whom the Lord of Israel spoke." Rather they are more recent converts to Judaism, and are not Semitic. So their claim to the lands of Israel based on birthright as a people is comical to say the least, as comical as some caucasian New Age convert to Native Americanism arguing the white man stole her land.

However, the irony is that these slavic Jews (as well as Brits, Irish, German, Scandinavian, etc.) are actually, in a roundabout way, descended from the Indo-European ten northern tribes of Israel, who were the true and original Israel. But so were the Semites of the southern tribes, as both north and south together comprised "Israel" according to the Bible.

Therefore those calling themselves Jews today are both genuine Jews and not genuine Jews depending on how you define it and where you draw the line. Many are not Semites, and their genetic ancestors did not speak Hebrew. Or rather, there's a good chance that a majority of non-Jewish WASP Americans may have descended from the Israelites too, but they neither know it nor would they try and steal land from the Palestinians to reclaim their "homelands" if they did. In the end, the Israel today is similar to Disney Land in that it's a place built on the premise of a fictionalized legacy that borrows from real history but isn't true history.