Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- 18:05 Kaliuna antifa nuts
- 18:05 synaptic good one
- 18:06 synaptic center for american progress
- 18:06 synaptic ADL
- 18:06 MacGuffin the republicans are only guilty of chicekshittery and hating cannabis
- 18:07 AilenNich MacGuffin: What is the most dangerous aspect of the Democrats?
- 18:07 AilenNich I think the most dangerous aspect of the GOP is that they are currently allowing the Madman Trump to remain president.
- 18:07 synaptic ailennich, what do you think it is?
- 18:07 synaptic ailennich, what is the most dangerous aspect of the Democrats?
- 18:07 AilenNich synaptic: I don't believe the Democrat Party is a threat to the nation.
- 18:07 synaptic why do you think Trump should not be president
- 18:07 MacGuffin the most dangerous aspect of the democratic party is anti-americanism and apologism for devout fundamentalist followers of mohammed
- 18:07 AilenNich I think they do pursue policies which overbenefit the elites of our society at the expense of most Americans.
- 18:07 Willpa don't forget that the Republicans can spend public money just like the democrats, see 2019-20 budget deal
- 18:08 AilenNich synaptic: Trump should not be be president for several hundred reasons.
- 18:08 MacGuffin if there is anybody who is against america (besides putin), they make excuses for that person
- 18:08 synaptic the most dangerous aspect of the democratic party is the concerted lawlessness
- 18:08 AilenNich A recent reason: He stated that he'd run into a school shooting, without a weapon, to stop the shootoing.
- 18:08 synaptic ailennich, name some
- 18:08 MacGuffin not all democrats, but the most outspoken politicians belonging to the democratic party
- 18:08 synaptic constitutional reasons
- 18:08 AilenNich I support the impeachment and removal from office any president who speaks like that.
- 18:08 AilenNich Why?
- 18:08 pilgrim` yeah. Trump won
- 18:08 MacGuffin it is a long list
- 18:08 pilgrim` t't pay
- 18:08 Willpa I'm very disappointed in the House of Representatives
- 18:08 Kaliuna AilenNich - lololololol --
- 18:08 AilenNich Because such words can only be uttered by a very unstable mind.
- 18:08 pilgrim` hey WIll
- 18:08 AilenNich MacGuffin: Name two.
- 18:09 Defunked oh look its someone whos never been here under any other nicl. hi ailennich
- 18:09 MacGuffin obama, clinton, feinstein, pelosi, chumer...
- 18:09 Defunked nick*
- 18:09 MacGuffin partisan hacks
- 18:09 Willpa Hail perigrinus maximus
- 18:09 MacGuffin schmuck schumer
- 18:09 AilenNich MacGuffin: So, the Democrat Party is more dangerous to the USA than the GOP.
- 18:09 pilgrim` AlienNich my my simple minds need to be babied
- 18:09 pilgrim` yes
- 18:09 AilenNich And that is because of some of their "outspoken" politicians.
- 18:09 AilenNich Which includes Obama and Clinton at head of your list.
- 18:09 pilgrim` its quite a bit more crooked
- 18:09 AilenNich Two two Democrats are currently not in political office.
- 18:09 synaptic ailennich, he passed a physical performed by a rear admiral of the navy, career doctor
- 18:09 MacGuffin hell, yeah. their economic policies are also total garbage
- 18:10 AilenNich How are these two private citizens dangerous to our nation?
- 18:10 MacGuffin their criminal justice ideas are misguided
- 18:10 synaptic ailennich, don't you think that admiral would have reported a mental deficit?
- 18:10 AilenNich synaptic: That medical doctor said several comments which render the entire medical extremely suspect.
- 18:10 synaptic ailennich, so you're calling him a liar?
- 18:10 AilenNich For example, "I told Trump if he ate better he could live to 200."
- 18:10 AilenNich synaptic: Yes.
- 18:10 synaptic what are your credentials?
- 18:10 synaptic are you a doctor?
- 18:11 synaptic perhaps a lpn?
- 18:11 AilenNich synaptic: I cannot prove that the Admiral lied. You should probably accept his testimony over mine.
- 18:11 AilenNich Also, I think he lied.
- 18:11 AilenNich And I think he lied because he has several examples of hyperbole in his report that cast the entire document into question.
- 18:11 synaptic ailennich, do you have any constitutional reasons for removing the duly elected president of these united states
- 18:11 AilenNich And, as a Rear Admiral, he should not have done this.
- 18:11 synaptic or is it that you just don't like him
- 18:11 AilenNich He should have taken his role to the nation very seriously and presented a document with only medical and scientific language.
- 18:11 AilenNich He did not do that.
- 18:11 tis A doctor can not publicly release anything about a patient’s health without the patient’s consent
- 18:12 MacGuffin feinstein, pelosi, schumer, franken, ginsberg, as far as federal officers go
- 18:12 Defunked lol just pasting shit
- 18:12 tis if Trump told the doctor he can’t say anything bad
- 18:12 tis then the doctor can’t say anything bad
- 18:12 tis simple as that
- 18:12 AilenNich synaptic: Conversation requires trust from one participant to another.
- 18:12 MacGuffin the governor of oregon is another one
- 18:12 AilenNich I have told you the reason.
- 18:12 MacGuffin dangerous woman she is
- 18:12 AilenNich If you do not trust me, then we cannot have a conversation.
- 18:12 AilenNich You do not need to trust my conclusions, of course.
- 18:12 MacGuffin bill de blasio is a dangerous man
- 18:12 pilgrim` Our Lesbain in Chief needs to go to soem nunnery
- 18:12 AilenNich Only that what I said is an honest representation of my internal state.
- 18:12 synaptic AilenNich, so you think trump is crazy and we should remove him on that belief?
- 18:12 AilenNich Correct.
- 18:12 MacGuffin they are ruining their own states and trying to ruin the whole country!
- 18:12 tis Trump’s a fat old man - you only need eyes to see that. You don’t need to be a doctor
- 18:12 *** cohokille quit (Ping timeout: 506 seconds)
- 18:12 AilenNich synaptic: What did you think of Donald Trump stating he would run into a school shooting, unarmed?
- 18:13 synaptic i think that donald trump pushes people's buttons
- 18:13 tis The reports about his height & weight are obvious lies
- 18:13 Willpa Ya see nearly no one paid attention to what I said, as usual, we have a highly irresponsible House of Representatives on another spending spree and nobody in here gives a shit because the R's are in the majority and can do no wrong, bullfuckinshitski
- 18:13 AilenNich What do you think of the truth of that statement, combined with the mental processes that generated it.
- 18:13 synaptic and you should not take everything he says literally
- 18:13 *** _Forbin quit ()
- 18:13 synaptic doing so, to me, is a sign of mental impairment
- 18:13 pilgrim` I think Trump found Alien Nich's buttons...personally
- 18:13 MacGuffin trump is not a saint! nobody claimed that he was!
- 18:13 MacGuffin damn it...
- 18:13 AilenNich What do you think of the truth of that statement, combined with the mental processes that generated it.
- 18:13 synaptic he was fishing for a reaction
- 18:14 synaptic and it looks like he got one
- 18:14 synaptic that's it, the art of the troll
- 18:14 AilenNich What reaction(s) was he fishing for?
- 18:14 [pack] wonder where realiste is?
- 18:14 synaptic i couldn't say precisely
- 18:14 synaptic ailennich
- 18:14 AilenNich Why do you think he was fishing for reactions?
- 18:14 synaptic trump has his plan though, it'll all come out in time
- 18:14 synaptic you will see and go aha
- 18:14 synaptic that crazy statement makes sense now
- 18:14 AilenNich "I don't stand by anything" - Donald Trump
- 18:15 Willpa the US is Twenty one trillion in debt and climbing
- 18:15 fred offtopic: are you able to access this ? : https://arteconcert-a.akamaihd.net/am/concert/073000/073900/073990-014-C_SQ_0_VO_03039037_MP4-2200_AMM-CONCERT-NEXT_l5pRYrbp2.mp4
- 18:15 urlinfo *** Content type: video/mp4
- 18:15 AilenNich synaptic: Should we take literally anything Donald Trump says?
- 18:15 synaptic he'll fake you out, even his own supporters
- 18:15 tis synaptic: And you think that’s appropriate behavior for a president? To respond to such a tragedy by attention-desperate trolling? You think it’s good that the president’s reaction to a bunch of children being murdered is “but but but what about MEEEEEEEEEE? PAY ATTENTION TO MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
- 18:15 synaptic he says outrageous things, things against his pledges, to whip up his base to eat out their congressmen's substance with phone calls and e-mails and so on
- 18:15 tis synaptic: I agree with you that it’s what he’s doing, I just wouldn’t hire someone who behaves that way to be a janitor
- 18:15 rakshasa what's after a trillion? quadrillion?
- 18:15 AilenNich You have a detailed model of Trump's intentionality.
- 18:16 tis rakshasa: Yes
- 18:16 tis rakshasa: 1000 trillion
- 18:16 sn00p AilenNich, nur nur nur retard retard alert
- 18:16 synaptic these are my suspicions after analyzing his moves for a couple years
- 18:16 AilenNich synaptic: Should we take literally anything Donald Trump says?
- 18:16 synaptic not on twitter
- 18:16 MacGuffin why?
- 18:16 tis pilgrim`: I didn’t bring up this topic, synaptic brought up the trolling.
- 18:16 AilenNich synaptic: He issued his statement on running into a school shooting, unarmed, in the Oval Office.
- 18:16 AilenNich Perhaps you forgot.
- 18:16 rakshasa take it out to the ballgame
- 18:16 MacGuffin trump is a hyperbolic speaker
- 18:16 synaptic i think you have to weigh each statement carefully
- 18:16 AilenNich synaptic: Should we take literally anything Donald Trump says?
- 18:17 synaptic i mean what he did to poor diane feinstein is practically elder abuse
- 18:17 AilenNich synaptic: That implies, yes, we should take some things he says literally.
- 18:17 synaptic he really hooked her, she's out pushing gun control lol
- 18:17 MacGuffin he said he would add ten feet to the wall every time vincente fox would complain about it
- 18:17 AilenNich What parts of this event causes you to understand it was not literal?
- 18:17 MacGuffin simple hyperbole
- 18:17 tis pilgrim`: But nonetheless, why is it a good thing for the president to respond to such a terrible tragedy that way? By trolling….and desperately trying to find some way to make it all about him, which is what synaptic claims he did?
- 18:17 rakshasa enough wall talk, let's start building it
- 18:17 AilenNich rakshasa: The wall is coming really soon.
- 18:17 AilenNich Believe me.
- 18:17 synaptic the president has his own motives there, hard to say without knowing everything he knows
- 18:18 rakshasa hopefully we don't hire too many illegals to build it
- 18:18 synaptic but some of the gambits are far more obvious
- 18:18 tis rakshasa: You know it’s not coming at this point.
- 18:18 AilenNich synaptic: When you asked me why I thought the Rear Admiral was lying, at least in part, I gave you a specific example.
- 18:18 tis You should have known it was a scam from day 1
- 18:18 *** cohokille joined #politics
- 18:18 tis but at this point? You know
- 18:18 AilenNich You appear unable to do that in this case.
- 18:18 synaptic he is getting people to play their hand, expose their positions and relationships, and so on
- 18:18 synaptic and it's all going into midterm campaign ads
- 18:18 AilenNich synaptic: Donald Trump is historically unpopular right now, though.
- 18:18 rakshasa some policies might be like "really soon" but never arrive
- 18:18 +++ Ekko has given voice to cohokille
- 18:18 AilenNich How do you manage that in your model?
- 18:19 synaptic ailennich, that is not my obvservation
- 18:19 synaptic perhaps in your backyard he is
- 18:19 AilenNich Oh, we don't need to personally observe these things.
- 18:19 AilenNich https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/
- 18:19 synaptic i should trust a poll then?
- 18:19 AilenNich There you go.
- 18:19 urlinfo *** Content type: text/html
- 18:19 synaptic ah yes fivethirtyeight
- 18:19 AilenNich You should trust aggregates of polls -- yes.
- 18:19 synaptic how'd they do predicting the outcome of the election?
- 18:19 AilenNich They gave Donald Trump a 30% chance of winning.
- 18:19 synaptic who won
- 18:19 AilenNich synaptic: Do you know how probability works?
- 18:19 tis synaptic: Quite well - RCP average was Hillary +3, the result of Hillary +2. That’s what they measure - the popular vote. They did an excellent job of it
- 18:19 synaptic does 538?
- 18:20 AilenNich synaptic: Have you ever played poker?
- 18:20 synaptic nope
- 18:20 synaptic not once
- 18:20 synaptic are you a gambler?
- 18:20 AilenNich synaptic: Say that the odds of me winning this pot are 80%, but I have to put in 70% of the pot to call.
- 18:20 AilenNich Should I make that bet?
- 18:20 AilenNich I should, right, because it's a positive expected value play.
- 18:20 *** Smax quit ()
- 18:20 tis AilenNich: You seriously shouldn’t have answered that question for him
- 18:20 tis he didn’t know the answer
- 18:21 synaptic
- 18:21 urlinfo *** Content type: image/png
- 18:21 AilenNich Now, when the cards are turned over, and I lose -- which will happen 20% of the time -- should I necessarily modify my priors?
- 18:21 AilenNich I shouldn't, right.
- 18:21 MacGuffin dials up presh talwalkar
- 18:21 tis he didn’t know it was an obvious call
- 18:21 tis seriously
- 18:21 MacGuffin
- 18:21 tis he didn't
- 18:21 AilenNich If you're familiar with Bayesian inference.
- 18:21 tis and he would have never figured it out
- 18:21 AilenNich synaptic: We don't know the 'odds of Trump winning the presidency.
- 18:21 AilenNich Because that's not how the universe works.
- 18:21 tis and good god, concepts such as the negative expected value of stating hands? That’s farrrrrrrrrrr beyond the mental capabilities of people here AilenNich. Don’t bother.
- 18:21 tis does play poker
- 18:21 AilenNich There are no 'odds' in the universe.
- 18:21 AilenNich There are only odds in probability models.
- 18:22 AilenNich Yes, the 538 model appears to have been an accurate model.
- 18:22 AilenNich Their estimate of 30% seems reasonable.
- 18:22 AilenNich tis: synaptic has training with neural networks.
- 18:22 synaptic well hey they're apparently saying trump is unpopular right now
- 18:22 MacGuffin what is the probablility that there will be an election at all?
- 18:22 MacGuffin 100%?
- 18:22 AilenNich He is able to recognize that my argument is sound.
- 18:22 AilenNich Though, he is unlikely to admit it.
- 18:22 synaptic is that true?
- 18:22 AilenNich For factional reasons.
- 18:22 synaptic or only true sometimes?
- 18:23 AilenNich synaptic: Their model indicates -- with high confidence -- that Donald Trump is historically unpopular.
- 18:23 synaptic so in a million election events, hillary would have won
- 18:23 MacGuffin trump has the homefield advantage
- 18:23 synaptic most of the time
- 18:23 AilenNich You can see his approval rating over time compared to other presidents.
- 18:23 synaptic but in that one, she didn't.. maybe she should run again then!
- 18:23 AilenNich synaptic: If you sample from the model 538 generated, Hillary won 70% of the time.
- 18:23 AilenNich You can't sample from reality, however.
- 18:23 synaptic would you support her in the next fake democratic primary?
- 18:23 MacGuffin when a president is unseated, how does it usually play out?
- 18:23 AilenNich Probability exists in models -- not the universe.
- 18:24 AilenNich synaptic: Hillary Clinton is irrelevant to this topic.
- 18:24 synaptic law of large numbers, right?
- 18:24 synaptic in any event, she has another shot at it in 2020
- 18:24 MacGuffin it happened twice in recent history, right? bush and carter
- 18:24 tis synaptic: You’ve spent the last 20 years claiming Hillary Clinton would be a terrible candidate who would surely lose. The data backed it up - she turned out to be the least favorable democratic nominee in the history of the party. You were right - she did lose. BARELY. Trump BARELY managed to beat the worst dem either
- 18:24 synaptic she should throw her hat into the ring, she'll surely win this time
- 18:24 synaptic how could she lose?
- 18:24 AilenNich synaptic: Are you now lost to the Hillary topic?
- 18:24 AilenNich I will move on, if so.
- 18:24 MacGuffin ford
- 18:24 tis synaptic: So it’s obvious why you’re desperate to cling to this delusional fantasy that she’d somehow run again - you know she’s the only possible candidate Trump would stand a chance again
- 18:24 synaptic your arrogance betrays your message
- 18:24 synaptic it's too bad
- 18:25 tis MAYBE he’d find a way to BARELY beat the worst dem nominee in history again!
- 18:25 AilenNich Being able to keep track of the structure of a conversation is a key cognitive skill.
- 18:25 MacGuffin hillary clinton did not deserve to win
- 18:25 tis but probably not - his approval has tanked it the last year
- 18:25 --- VonMises has banned ailennich!*@*
- 18:25 *** AilenNich was kicked by Kalypso (Banned: go away forever)
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement