Advertisement
JaysonSunshine

Hatred of Reason: GOP voter edition

Mar 5th, 2018
85
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 16.41 KB | None | 0 0
  1. 18:05 Kaliuna antifa nuts
  2. 18:05 synaptic good one
  3. 18:06 synaptic center for american progress
  4. 18:06 synaptic ADL
  5. 18:06 MacGuffin the republicans are only guilty of chicekshittery and hating cannabis
  6. 18:07 AilenNich MacGuffin: What is the most dangerous aspect of the Democrats?
  7. 18:07 AilenNich I think the most dangerous aspect of the GOP is that they are currently allowing the Madman Trump to remain president.
  8. 18:07 synaptic ailennich, what do you think it is?
  9. 18:07 synaptic ailennich, what is the most dangerous aspect of the Democrats?
  10. 18:07 AilenNich synaptic: I don't believe the Democrat Party is a threat to the nation.
  11. 18:07 synaptic why do you think Trump should not be president
  12. 18:07 MacGuffin the most dangerous aspect of the democratic party is anti-americanism and apologism for devout fundamentalist followers of mohammed
  13. 18:07 AilenNich I think they do pursue policies which overbenefit the elites of our society at the expense of most Americans.
  14. 18:07 Willpa don't forget that the Republicans can spend public money just like the democrats, see 2019-20 budget deal
  15. 18:08 AilenNich synaptic: Trump should not be be president for several hundred reasons.
  16. 18:08 MacGuffin if there is anybody who is against america (besides putin), they make excuses for that person
  17. 18:08 synaptic the most dangerous aspect of the democratic party is the concerted lawlessness
  18. 18:08 AilenNich A recent reason: He stated that he'd run into a school shooting, without a weapon, to stop the shootoing.
  19. 18:08 synaptic ailennich, name some
  20. 18:08 MacGuffin not all democrats, but the most outspoken politicians belonging to the democratic party
  21. 18:08 synaptic constitutional reasons
  22. 18:08 AilenNich I support the impeachment and removal from office any president who speaks like that.
  23. 18:08 AilenNich Why?
  24. 18:08 pilgrim` yeah. Trump won
  25. 18:08 MacGuffin it is a long list
  26. 18:08 pilgrim` t't pay
  27. 18:08 Willpa I'm very disappointed in the House of Representatives
  28. 18:08 Kaliuna AilenNich - lololololol --
  29. 18:08 AilenNich Because such words can only be uttered by a very unstable mind.
  30. 18:08 pilgrim` hey WIll
  31. 18:08 AilenNich MacGuffin: Name two.
  32. 18:09 Defunked oh look its someone whos never been here under any other nicl. hi ailennich
  33. 18:09 MacGuffin obama, clinton, feinstein, pelosi, chumer...
  34. 18:09 Defunked nick*
  35. 18:09 MacGuffin partisan hacks
  36. 18:09 Willpa Hail perigrinus maximus
  37. 18:09 MacGuffin schmuck schumer
  38. 18:09 AilenNich MacGuffin: So, the Democrat Party is more dangerous to the USA than the GOP.
  39. 18:09 pilgrim` AlienNich my my simple minds need to be babied
  40. 18:09 pilgrim` yes
  41. 18:09 AilenNich And that is because of some of their "outspoken" politicians.
  42. 18:09 AilenNich Which includes Obama and Clinton at head of your list.
  43. 18:09 pilgrim` its quite a bit more crooked
  44. 18:09 AilenNich Two two Democrats are currently not in political office.
  45. 18:09 synaptic ailennich, he passed a physical performed by a rear admiral of the navy, career doctor
  46. 18:09 MacGuffin hell, yeah. their economic policies are also total garbage
  47. 18:10 AilenNich How are these two private citizens dangerous to our nation?
  48. 18:10 MacGuffin their criminal justice ideas are misguided
  49. 18:10 synaptic ailennich, don't you think that admiral would have reported a mental deficit?
  50. 18:10 AilenNich synaptic: That medical doctor said several comments which render the entire medical extremely suspect.
  51. 18:10 synaptic ailennich, so you're calling him a liar?
  52. 18:10 AilenNich For example, "I told Trump if he ate better he could live to 200."
  53. 18:10 AilenNich synaptic: Yes.
  54. 18:10 synaptic what are your credentials?
  55. 18:10 synaptic are you a doctor?
  56. 18:11 synaptic perhaps a lpn?
  57. 18:11 AilenNich synaptic: I cannot prove that the Admiral lied. You should probably accept his testimony over mine.
  58. 18:11 AilenNich Also, I think he lied.
  59. 18:11 AilenNich And I think he lied because he has several examples of hyperbole in his report that cast the entire document into question.
  60. 18:11 synaptic ailennich, do you have any constitutional reasons for removing the duly elected president of these united states
  61. 18:11 AilenNich And, as a Rear Admiral, he should not have done this.
  62. 18:11 synaptic or is it that you just don't like him
  63. 18:11 AilenNich He should have taken his role to the nation very seriously and presented a document with only medical and scientific language.
  64. 18:11 AilenNich He did not do that.
  65. 18:11 tis A doctor can not publicly release anything about a patient’s health without the patient’s consent
  66. 18:12 MacGuffin feinstein, pelosi, schumer, franken, ginsberg, as far as federal officers go
  67. 18:12 Defunked lol just pasting shit
  68. 18:12 tis if Trump told the doctor he can’t say anything bad
  69. 18:12 tis then the doctor can’t say anything bad
  70. 18:12 tis simple as that
  71. 18:12 AilenNich synaptic: Conversation requires trust from one participant to another.
  72. 18:12 MacGuffin the governor of oregon is another one
  73. 18:12 AilenNich I have told you the reason.
  74. 18:12 MacGuffin dangerous woman she is
  75. 18:12 AilenNich If you do not trust me, then we cannot have a conversation.
  76. 18:12 AilenNich You do not need to trust my conclusions, of course.
  77. 18:12 MacGuffin bill de blasio is a dangerous man
  78. 18:12 pilgrim` Our Lesbain in Chief needs to go to soem nunnery
  79. 18:12 AilenNich Only that what I said is an honest representation of my internal state.
  80. 18:12 synaptic AilenNich, so you think trump is crazy and we should remove him on that belief?
  81. 18:12 AilenNich Correct.
  82. 18:12 MacGuffin they are ruining their own states and trying to ruin the whole country!
  83. 18:12 tis Trump’s a fat old man - you only need eyes to see that. You don’t need to be a doctor
  84. 18:12 *** cohokille quit (Ping timeout: 506 seconds)
  85. 18:12 AilenNich synaptic: What did you think of Donald Trump stating he would run into a school shooting, unarmed?
  86. 18:13 synaptic i think that donald trump pushes people's buttons
  87. 18:13 tis The reports about his height & weight are obvious lies
  88. 18:13 Willpa Ya see nearly no one paid attention to what I said, as usual, we have a highly irresponsible House of Representatives on another spending spree and nobody in here gives a shit because the R's are in the majority and can do no wrong, bullfuckinshitski
  89. 18:13 AilenNich What do you think of the truth of that statement, combined with the mental processes that generated it.
  90. 18:13 synaptic and you should not take everything he says literally
  91. 18:13 *** _Forbin quit ()
  92. 18:13 synaptic doing so, to me, is a sign of mental impairment
  93. 18:13 pilgrim` I think Trump found Alien Nich's buttons...personally
  94. 18:13 MacGuffin trump is not a saint! nobody claimed that he was!
  95. 18:13 MacGuffin damn it...
  96. 18:13 AilenNich What do you think of the truth of that statement, combined with the mental processes that generated it.
  97. 18:13 synaptic he was fishing for a reaction
  98. 18:14 synaptic and it looks like he got one
  99. 18:14 synaptic that's it, the art of the troll
  100. 18:14 AilenNich What reaction(s) was he fishing for?
  101. 18:14 [pack] wonder where realiste is?
  102. 18:14 synaptic i couldn't say precisely
  103. 18:14 synaptic ailennich
  104. 18:14 AilenNich Why do you think he was fishing for reactions?
  105. 18:14 synaptic trump has his plan though, it'll all come out in time
  106. 18:14 synaptic you will see and go aha
  107. 18:14 synaptic that crazy statement makes sense now
  108. 18:14 AilenNich "I don't stand by anything" - Donald Trump
  109. 18:15 Willpa the US is Twenty one trillion in debt and climbing
  110. 18:15 fred offtopic: are you able to access this ? : https://arteconcert-a.akamaihd.net/am/concert/073000/073900/073990-014-C_SQ_0_VO_03039037_MP4-2200_AMM-CONCERT-NEXT_l5pRYrbp2.mp4
  111. 18:15 urlinfo *** Content type: video/mp4
  112. 18:15 AilenNich synaptic: Should we take literally anything Donald Trump says?
  113. 18:15 synaptic he'll fake you out, even his own supporters
  114. 18:15 tis synaptic: And you think that’s appropriate behavior for a president? To respond to such a tragedy by attention-desperate trolling? You think it’s good that the president’s reaction to a bunch of children being murdered is “but but but what about MEEEEEEEEEE? PAY ATTENTION TO MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
  115. 18:15 synaptic he says outrageous things, things against his pledges, to whip up his base to eat out their congressmen's substance with phone calls and e-mails and so on
  116. 18:15 tis synaptic: I agree with you that it’s what he’s doing, I just wouldn’t hire someone who behaves that way to be a janitor
  117. 18:15 rakshasa what's after a trillion? quadrillion?
  118. 18:15 AilenNich You have a detailed model of Trump's intentionality.
  119. 18:16 tis rakshasa: Yes
  120. 18:16 tis rakshasa: 1000 trillion
  121. 18:16 sn00p AilenNich, nur nur nur retard retard alert
  122. 18:16 synaptic these are my suspicions after analyzing his moves for a couple years
  123. 18:16 AilenNich synaptic: Should we take literally anything Donald Trump says?
  124. 18:16 synaptic not on twitter
  125. 18:16 MacGuffin why?
  126. 18:16 tis pilgrim`: I didn’t bring up this topic, synaptic brought up the trolling.
  127. 18:16 AilenNich synaptic: He issued his statement on running into a school shooting, unarmed, in the Oval Office.
  128. 18:16 AilenNich Perhaps you forgot.
  129. 18:16 rakshasa take it out to the ballgame
  130. 18:16 MacGuffin trump is a hyperbolic speaker
  131. 18:16 synaptic i think you have to weigh each statement carefully
  132. 18:16 AilenNich synaptic: Should we take literally anything Donald Trump says?
  133. 18:17 synaptic i mean what he did to poor diane feinstein is practically elder abuse
  134. 18:17 AilenNich synaptic: That implies, yes, we should take some things he says literally.
  135. 18:17 synaptic he really hooked her, she's out pushing gun control lol
  136. 18:17 MacGuffin he said he would add ten feet to the wall every time vincente fox would complain about it
  137. 18:17 AilenNich What parts of this event causes you to understand it was not literal?
  138. 18:17 MacGuffin simple hyperbole
  139. 18:17 tis pilgrim`: But nonetheless, why is it a good thing for the president to respond to such a terrible tragedy that way? By trolling….and desperately trying to find some way to make it all about him, which is what synaptic claims he did?
  140. 18:17 rakshasa enough wall talk, let's start building it
  141. 18:17 AilenNich rakshasa: The wall is coming really soon.
  142. 18:17 AilenNich Believe me.
  143. 18:17 synaptic the president has his own motives there, hard to say without knowing everything he knows
  144. 18:18 rakshasa hopefully we don't hire too many illegals to build it
  145. 18:18 synaptic but some of the gambits are far more obvious
  146. 18:18 tis rakshasa: You know it’s not coming at this point.
  147. 18:18 AilenNich synaptic: When you asked me why I thought the Rear Admiral was lying, at least in part, I gave you a specific example.
  148. 18:18 tis You should have known it was a scam from day 1
  149. 18:18 *** cohokille joined #politics
  150. 18:18 tis but at this point? You know
  151. 18:18 AilenNich You appear unable to do that in this case.
  152. 18:18 synaptic he is getting people to play their hand, expose their positions and relationships, and so on
  153. 18:18 synaptic and it's all going into midterm campaign ads
  154. 18:18 AilenNich synaptic: Donald Trump is historically unpopular right now, though.
  155. 18:18 rakshasa some policies might be like "really soon" but never arrive
  156. 18:18 +++ Ekko has given voice to cohokille
  157. 18:18 AilenNich How do you manage that in your model?
  158. 18:19 synaptic ailennich, that is not my obvservation
  159. 18:19 synaptic perhaps in your backyard he is
  160. 18:19 AilenNich Oh, we don't need to personally observe these things.
  161. 18:19 AilenNich https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/
  162. 18:19 synaptic i should trust a poll then?
  163. 18:19 AilenNich There you go.
  164. 18:19 urlinfo *** Content type: text/html
  165. 18:19 synaptic ah yes fivethirtyeight
  166. 18:19 AilenNich You should trust aggregates of polls -- yes.
  167. 18:19 synaptic how'd they do predicting the outcome of the election?
  168. 18:19 AilenNich They gave Donald Trump a 30% chance of winning.
  169. 18:19 synaptic who won
  170. 18:19 AilenNich synaptic: Do you know how probability works?
  171. 18:19 tis synaptic: Quite well - RCP average was Hillary +3, the result of Hillary +2. That’s what they measure - the popular vote. They did an excellent job of it
  172. 18:19 synaptic does 538?
  173. 18:20 AilenNich synaptic: Have you ever played poker?
  174. 18:20 synaptic nope
  175. 18:20 synaptic not once
  176. 18:20 synaptic are you a gambler?
  177. 18:20 AilenNich synaptic: Say that the odds of me winning this pot are 80%, but I have to put in 70% of the pot to call.
  178. 18:20 AilenNich Should I make that bet?
  179. 18:20 AilenNich I should, right, because it's a positive expected value play.
  180. 18:20 *** Smax quit ()
  181. 18:20 tis AilenNich: You seriously shouldn’t have answered that question for him
  182. 18:20 tis he didn’t know the answer
  183. 18:21 synaptic
  184. 18:21 urlinfo *** Content type: image/png
  185. 18:21 AilenNich Now, when the cards are turned over, and I lose -- which will happen 20% of the time -- should I necessarily modify my priors?
  186. 18:21 AilenNich I shouldn't, right.
  187. 18:21 MacGuffin dials up presh talwalkar
  188. 18:21 tis he didn’t know it was an obvious call
  189. 18:21 tis seriously
  190. 18:21 MacGuffin
  191. 18:21 tis he didn't
  192. 18:21 AilenNich If you're familiar with Bayesian inference.
  193. 18:21 tis and he would have never figured it out
  194. 18:21 AilenNich synaptic: We don't know the 'odds of Trump winning the presidency.
  195. 18:21 AilenNich Because that's not how the universe works.
  196. 18:21 tis and good god, concepts such as the negative expected  value of stating hands? That’s farrrrrrrrrrr beyond the mental capabilities of people here AilenNich. Don’t bother.
  197. 18:21 tis does play poker
  198. 18:21 AilenNich There are no 'odds' in the universe.
  199. 18:21 AilenNich There are only odds in probability models.
  200. 18:22 AilenNich Yes, the 538 model appears to have been an accurate model.
  201. 18:22 AilenNich Their estimate of 30% seems reasonable.
  202. 18:22 AilenNich tis: synaptic has training with neural networks.
  203. 18:22 synaptic well hey they're apparently saying trump is unpopular right now
  204. 18:22 MacGuffin what is the probablility that there will be an election at all?
  205. 18:22 MacGuffin 100%?
  206. 18:22 AilenNich He is able to recognize that my argument is sound.
  207. 18:22 AilenNich Though, he is unlikely to admit it.
  208. 18:22 synaptic is that true?
  209. 18:22 AilenNich For factional reasons.
  210. 18:22 synaptic or only true sometimes?
  211. 18:23 AilenNich synaptic: Their model indicates -- with high confidence -- that Donald Trump is historically unpopular.
  212. 18:23 synaptic so in a million election events, hillary would have won
  213. 18:23 MacGuffin trump has the homefield advantage
  214. 18:23 synaptic most of the time
  215. 18:23 AilenNich You can see his approval rating over time compared to other presidents.
  216. 18:23 synaptic but in that one, she didn't.. maybe she should run again then!
  217. 18:23 AilenNich synaptic: If you sample from the model 538 generated, Hillary won 70% of the time.
  218. 18:23 AilenNich You can't sample from reality, however.
  219. 18:23 synaptic would you support her in the next fake democratic primary?
  220. 18:23 MacGuffin when a president is unseated, how does it usually play out?
  221. 18:23 AilenNich Probability exists in models -- not the universe.
  222. 18:24 AilenNich synaptic: Hillary Clinton is irrelevant to this topic.
  223. 18:24 synaptic law of large numbers, right?
  224. 18:24 synaptic in any event, she has another shot at it in 2020
  225. 18:24 MacGuffin it happened twice in recent history, right? bush and carter
  226. 18:24 tis synaptic: You’ve spent the last 20 years claiming Hillary Clinton would be a terrible candidate who would surely lose. The data backed it up - she turned out to be the least favorable democratic nominee in the history of the party. You were right - she did lose. BARELY. Trump BARELY managed to beat the worst dem either
  227. 18:24 synaptic she should throw her hat into the ring, she'll surely win this time
  228. 18:24 synaptic how could she lose?
  229. 18:24 AilenNich synaptic: Are you now lost to the Hillary topic?
  230. 18:24 AilenNich I will move on, if so.
  231. 18:24 MacGuffin ford
  232. 18:24 tis synaptic: So it’s obvious why you’re desperate to cling to this delusional fantasy that she’d somehow run again - you know she’s the only possible candidate Trump would stand a chance again
  233. 18:24 synaptic your arrogance betrays your message
  234. 18:24 synaptic it's too bad
  235. 18:25 tis MAYBE he’d find a way to BARELY beat the worst dem nominee in history again!
  236. 18:25 AilenNich Being able to keep track of the structure of a conversation is a key cognitive skill.
  237. 18:25 MacGuffin hillary clinton did not deserve to win
  238. 18:25 tis but probably not - his approval has tanked it the last year
  239. 18:25 --- VonMises has banned ailennich!*@*
  240. 18:25 *** AilenNich was kicked by Kalypso (Banned: go away forever)
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement