Lesta

12 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-23 1530 +Quantum Field

Aug 23rd, 2016
116
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.23 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-23 1530 +Quantum Field
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Mint1JewWo&google_comment_id=z120hnhz2vupxvwya04cefeicubxutgi00c
  3. https://pastebin.com/h9mxJSQ8
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Quantum Field __ Uh, exactly how close has the general public been permitted near "Stephen Hawking"? *Are you suggesting that anyone can go up to him and shake at his floppy hand?* _Don't be that kind of joker_.
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10. And did these people you say have met him ask him about his *many* books and *many* lectures? But why would they? If they are anything like you they would have just "assumed" everything is above board.
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14. Is that really how you go through life? Assuming that your "hunches" are as good as facts?
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18. You have asked for a "good reason" to doubt the claims about "Stephen Hawking". Forgive me as I spit water all over my desk. *Are you really incapable of thinking of any?*
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22. No wonder you have invested your belief in the absurd "Stephen Hawking" story.
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26. *Is "Stephen Hawking" not regarded as an expert in his field?* Is he not quoted and cited? Is he not respected by "experts"?
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30. So tell me - *do you understand how much reading and _hard work_ is required to lead a field let alone be merely cited as an expert in it?*
  31.  
  32.  
  33.  
  34. How can *you* have studied *anything* - _in a serious way_ - when this incongruence has not yet occurred to you?
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38. Are you going to tell me that "Stephen Hawking" can really keep up with the discipline of "cosmology"?
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42. Or must you be forced to admit that either "Stephen Hawking" cannot be an expert (and therefore is illegitimately referenced as one) or that "cosmology" is a *bullsh!t discipline* which does not require the use of calculators, computers, pen and paper. (Or much reading for that matter.)
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46. You can't have it both ways.
  47.  
  48.  
  49.  
  50. If "Stephen Hawking" is regarded as an expert *then he must be able to keep up with the field*.
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54. If someone as profoundly disabled as we are supposed to believe about "Stephen Hawking" can keep up with such a field then that field cannot be all that difficult to keep up with in the first place, right?
  55.  
  56.  
  57.  
  58. Yes - that's right.
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62. Do you even realise it has been over 50 years since "Stephen Hawking" has been able to make use of pen and paper let alone whiteboards, calculators and computers?
  63.  
  64.  
  65.  
  66. You require "cosmology" to be a discipline that's as easy to keep up with as sitting in a chair and dribbling drool all over the place.
  67.  
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71. Either that or "Stephen Hawking" is not the "expert" we are encouraged to believe.
  72.  
  73.  
  74.  
  75. And you require me to give you a "good reason" to doubt the claims about "Stephen Hawking"? And you wonder why I would spit water all over my desk in response?!
  76.  
  77.  
  78.  
  79. *Oh my, you just haven't got a f_cking clue!*
  80.  
  81. ______________________________________________________________
  82. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  83.  
  84. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  85. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
  86.  
  87. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  88. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  89.  
  90. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  91. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  92.  
  93. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  94. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  95.  
  96. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  97. What exists - exists to always exist.
  98. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment