API tools faq
paste
Lesta

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-06-13 1515 +freddy fazbear

Lesta
Jun 13th, 2016
109
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.90 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-06-13 1515 +freddy fazbear
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGU7tzM1GsQ&lc=z13strcryzyjxfu4i04cch1hslnfxvngjy00k
  3. https://pastebin.com/h1bCNHVd
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +freddy fazbear __ Howdy. No one denies that there is a bright light in the sky that whizzes past according to a timetable that is consistently referred to as the "ISS". What is being contested is that it is permanently inhabited with little men and women who are living, breathing, eating and sh!tting in a permanent zero/micro-gravity environment. Or is it that you can imagine every bright light in the sky is inhabited?
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14. Keep in mind that I am not the one making a claim. I am instead disputing an extravagant claim that is made by "NASA" and pals every single day. For "NASA" and pals to prove their claim of having a real *and manned* "ISS" it should be the easiest thing in the world for them to do (it could even be done in the next half an hour): *Simply provide 10 minutes of genuine zero/micro-gravity footage that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans*.
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21. Given that in more than 15+ years of an alleged manned "ISS" it would seem we are not permitted to see such qualifying footage. All footage - upon scrutiny - contains *shenanigans*. Of course - that in and of itself does not prove the alleged bright light in the sky called the "ISS" is not inhabited. No. I am not suggesting that. Rather - *I am suggesting only that it means "sufficient proof" - _that which necessarily proves the claim_ - is being withheld/denied*.
  22.  
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28. I.e., that we are in a lie system that actively "censors" sufficient proof so as to force the population to believe events and claims on trust and to "fill in the blanks" with their imagination.
  29.  
  30.  
  31.  
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35. Of the hundreds to thousands of purported "ISS" videos - over more than 15+ years - there is no reason why we would not by now have seen such qualifying footage - _even if only accidentally._ And so all honest, rational and intelligent people must explore the possibility that sufficient proof is being intentionally withheld. Like it's a policy. What kind of "system" would do such a thing? A good and noble one?
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42. By the way, I'm curious - did you hear about the recent alleged shooting of "Christina Grimmie"? Do you believe that was a genuine shooting? If so, why?
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46. __________________________________________
  47. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  48. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  49.  
  50. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  51. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  52.  
  53. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  54. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  55.  
  56. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  57. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!