1. The Sapphire speedrunning community is in a debate.
2. It centers on the legitimacy of MexiricanBassMonkey's (MBM) world record run.
3. The run clocked in at 2:02:23.
4. The concerns revolve around remarkable luck throughout the run.
5. It was recorded offstream and lacks accompanying splits.
6. MBM claims a significant improvement from a previous personal best of around 2:26:xx.
7. This improvement seems unlikely given the game's challenging nature.
8. The argument that MBM reset for perfection doesn't hold.
9. There's an absence of typical time losses in the run.
10. This suggests consistently favorable RNG.
11. MBM's decisions assume he will receive good luck.
12. Questions arise regarding the absence of recorded splits.
13. MBM uses older, riskier strategies with minimal time-saving potential.
14. The absence of other recorded runs raises suspicions.
15. The use of Rock Tomb, with none missing, is perplexing.
16. Extreme situations like the Zangoose fight add to suspicions.
17. Concerns extend beyond individual records to the community's integrity.
18. The run doesn't accurately represent Sapphire's challenges.
19. The community should uphold higher standards.
20. The author seeks support from the Sapphire community.
21. The primary goal is to engage MBM in a discussion about the run.
22. Key points include the lack of recorded runs and splits.
23. The author believes the run is likely manipulated.
24. Gathering support is crucial in addressing these concerns.
25. It aims to seek clarification from MBM.
26. The suspicions raise doubts about the run's authenticity.
27. The incredible luck throughout the run is a significant point of contention.
28. The offstream recording and missing splits fuel doubts.
29. MBM's claim of a significant time reduction from his previous PB seems improbable.
30. Resetting for perfection doesn't explain the extraordinary run.
31. The absence of typical time losses in the run is suspicious.
32. MBM's confident decisions suggest an expectation of good luck.
33. The absence of recorded splits is unusual, given that MBM claims to use them.
34. Riskier strategies are employed, which don't account for the extraordinary luck.
35. The lack of other recorded runs between the PB and the world record is concerning.
36. The heavy reliance on Rock Tomb without any misses raises eyebrows.
37. Extreme situations in the run, like the Zangoose fight, are highly improbable.
38. The concern goes beyond the record, affecting the community's reputation.
39. The run doesn't accurately depict the typical challenges in Sapphire.
40. Upholding higher standards is essential for the community's integrity.
41. The author seeks support from the Sapphire community to address these doubts.
42. The primary aim is to initiate a dialogue with MBM regarding the run.
43. Critical points to be discussed include the missing recorded runs and splits.
44. The author firmly believes that the run is manipulated in some way.
45. Gathering support is vital to investigate these concerns further.
46. The intention is to seek clarification from MBM about the run.
47. Doubts cast shadows on the run's authenticity.
48. The exceptionally favorable RNG draws attention.
49. The run's offstream recording and lack of splits contribute to suspicions.
50. The claim of a substantial time reduction from the previous PB seems implausible.
51. The theory of resetting for perfection doesn't hold up.
52. The absence of typical time losses raises alarms.
53. Confident decisions indicate an expectation of good luck.
54. The lack of recorded splits contradicts MBM's usual practice.
55. Riskier strategies don't explain the extraordinary luck.
56. The absence of other recorded runs before the world record is puzzling.
57. The frequent use of Rock Tomb without misses raises doubts.
58. Extreme situations, like the Zangoose fight, defy probability.
59. The community's reputation is at stake beyond the record itself.
60. The run fails to portray the typical challenges in Sapphire.
61. Upholding high standards is essential for the community's credibility.
62. The author seeks the Sapphire community's support to address these concerns.
63. The primary objective is to engage MBM in a discussion about the run.
64. Crucial points of discussion include the missing recorded runs and splits.
65. The author firmly believes that the run is manipulated.
66. Gathering support is crucial to investigate these concerns thoroughly.
67. The goal is to seek clarification from MBM about the run.
68. Doubts cast shadows on the run's authenticity.
69. The exceptional luck, offstream recording, and missing splits raise serious questions.