Kings and Queens

lol @ the rightful heir to the British throne being an old Australian boomer who thinks Australia should be a republic and sever itself from the monarchy's influence.

He has grandkids, too.

Monarchy isn't considered very interesting here in America, aside from the Prince & Markle and the death of Princess Diana, but in other countries (and back in the day), monarchy was the stuff of biblical legend. A special breed of human appointed by the divine itself. In the best cases, kings and queen regents were groomed from birth to be impartial, considerate, strong and wise rulers. At worst they were depraved and incestuous baby eating monsters. Heaven and hell right there.

On paper, a monarchy sounds great. Perfectly cultivating your rulers from the ground up, based on ancient and tested customs and traditions --- and yet, it goes so horribly, horribly wrong.

Sure, one could argue that it's just human nature to degenerate into reprobates and failures. That absolute power corrupts absolutely. Some might even argue that it is for that very reason we are a parasite or cancer on the world.

But... I don't know. I don't think that's the case. I know myself and I know I am good. Even at my worst I flinch at the harm I cause others.

No, no, no. I don't think it's humanity that is so bad.

I really do think there is a devil. I certainly believe in a God, and I show that by capitalizing his title and showing some minimum of reverence when speaking of it. And regardless of the semantics of such a thing, whether it is a universal force or a personification, it is at least real. But then, doesn't that imply the inversion is true as well? Yin and yang reflect it perfectly. Even the seal of Solomon (so-called star of David) shows heaven meeting Earth, implying an implicit duality.

As to whether this duality is ultimately two expressions of the same force, though, is another question. Perhaps the Idea of Good and the Idea of Evil come from a greater mind? Like a conscious and a subconscious?

Perhaps then, from the perspective of Evil, Good is the subconscious. And from Good's perspective, it is conscious and Evil is subconscious.

But what about the perspective of that which is "most high"?

Is the Most High, from whom Good and Evil spring, a neutral observer? Is he ultimately good? The highest good? But then is he not the highest evil?

But I suppose from his perspective, he would value both equally. Duality gives way to creation. If duality is more than just good and evil, but also somethingness and nothingness, and chaos and order, and so on and so forth, then it would be necessary for both to exist for anything to exist. If there was no "nothing" (space) between us, we would all be mushed together as one contiguous, uniform, symmetrical, infinite blob. There wouldn't even be a nothingness outside of us, much less between us.

But then I wonder, are those different forms of duality comparable? Are chaos and order comparable to good and evil, to something and nothing, to light and dark? Are these distinctions arbitrary constructs of human perception?

Or perhaps, there is a sacred geometry to things after all, and that maybe all dualities are comparable. All trinities are comparable. And so-on. And these manifest from the conceptual to the physical, such as with musical notes or architecture.

Anyway. I'm rambling. What I'm saying is, I think there is merit to the idea that our physical existence is a shadow, reflection, or echo of sorts, of higher dimensional concepts. That concepts beyond logic do in fact EXIST, in their own physical sense, in a world between our world, and they unfold on our plane as they do on their plane.

And based on the ramblings of our ancestors, and on their testimonies, I say that organized, objective, intelligent, metaphysical evil does in fact exist.

Now. What does this have to do with the Monarchy?

Well, I'd start with looking into Aleister Crowley, Jimmy Savile, and Vlad the Impaler, for starters. Then look into illuminati bloodlines in general, but as far as basics go, those first three names should be more than sufficient to lend weight to what I'm alluding to.

We might call them God and Satan. The elites have their own names for them. But most importantly, the elites recognize that the spiritual war is DUALISTIC in nature. The elites recognize that there are two opposing forces. A fake and a real. A dark and a light.

Who they call God may be Baal, or Molech, or Osiris, or Lucifer. But I would not make the mistake of believing that their god is our God. Or, my God, since I'm sure many of you have either abandoned these concepts all together, or believe in singular approaches where "Satan" does not exist,

But for our purposes, and practically speaking, they worship Satan. They commune with spirits and summon demons.

And, maybe, just maybe, the truth is that demons are interdimensional entities or Reptilians, and God/angels are the Anunnaki or Gods of Old or an advanced race of Humanoids who created us but not existence... That's all possible too, I suppose.

But in any case. Whatever these things are. The elites are communicating with them, or believe they are, and there's more evidence to support this than you might think.

Whatever the truth is, there is something truly bizarre and unsettling out there.

I won't stop, I can't stop, until I figure out what the hell is really going on. And I sincerely pray to God we all find out together.

---

As for me becoming some sort of religious man, I don't know about that. But I'm not going to shy away from showing respect for divine subjects that much of society has been conditioned to ridicule.

My phone is glitching out hard now. Fun stuff. Good old catharsis.