Randy Credico on Fred Dicker (06/02/2017)

Supplemental document for: "Theory that Roger Stone's back channel to Wikileaks was Randy Credico", link: https://wakelet.com/wake/2d352ae9-febe-44a1-a7bb-51674a2e4bf5

Randy Credico on "Focus on the State Capitol", hosted by Fred Dicker. Broadcast date: June 2, 2017.

Transcript excerpt runs from 42:47 to 46:13.

File link: http://www.mediafire.com/file/pe4b0rv8be93c0y/FSC62171.mp3

FRED DICKER
I gather that Donald Trump, president Trump, is creating tremendous fodder for you. I got an announcement from you about your latest event coming up, WBAI related event, I gather, and you're talking about it being an opportunity for forgetting about what's going on in Washington. How are things going at WBAI? Because they've been, in the past, been torn apart by internal fights I know, but you emerged there as an important figure.

RANDY CREDICO
Well, you know, I guess the majority of the people don't like Trump at that station, and look - I supported Jill Stein, as you know, and I got a lot of heat by- by some of them, not a lot of heat, but heat by some listeners and some other producers because I was against Hillary Clinton [laughs]. You know what I mean? I still have that. And I have no regrets for that. Hillary Clinton was the absolute, she would have been the fourth person I would have voted for in a four person race. Uuuuh and though, and then she was out the other day with that same old act, talking about the Russians, I mean, did you see how bad she was? I mean, could you just tell the truth? Okay, it was the Russians that told her not to go to Wisconsin. It was the Russians that told her not to go to Michigan. It's their fault. So, they keep pushing this out, this is killing the Democratic party, Fred. They gotta let go of that narrative. It's not true. They gotta let it go, because how does it help us right now? How does it help the Democratic party? People like Adam Schiff, people like Jerrold Nadler, they keep pushing this Russian thing...the intelligence community can't come up with any solid proof. It's so bad, that that, that Adam Schiff made this guy Tucker Carlson look like a genius the other day [honestly have no idea when this took place], alright? He got sympathy from the _left_, because he buried Schiff.

DICKER
Hold on, let me just mention something. One of the things I thought was really kindof stupid on Hillary Clinton's part, she is not a stupid woman. But I think some of her positions are pretty stupid. She was claiming that they- back in August, last August, the Clinton people, knew that the Russians were meddling, and they were hearing it from intelligence sources, well why didn't they, if that was the case, why didn't she publicly call on President Obama and all the Democrats in charge of Washington to take action then? The best we have, is that one of Obama's people supposedly called up one of his Russian counterparts, said "Cut it out." What the hell does that mean? How ridiculous is that?

CREDICO
Well, how about this, Fred...is that they don't even have the FBI investigating these so-called leak, uh, of the DNC. They don't have the FBI-

DICKER
The DNC wouldn't let them come in. Right.

CREDICO
No.

DICKER
What explains that?

CREDICO
What explains it, is they have a lot to hide. So they wanted to be controlled, it was it was basically just...window dressing, somebody looked in, and they put the blame on the Russians without any substantive proof, conclusive proof, it was basically allegations, I mean, let's be honest, Fred: she lost that election because she was the worst candidate, and if there was any meddling in the election last year, it was by her, the DNC, Paul Begala, and that crew, by screwing Bernie Sanders.

DICKER
And also the Obama people, by unmasking names of people, and, before they unmasked them, by spying on people who were in, it appears, the Trump campaign. Randy, we're out of time. We gotta run, it's always great to have you with us.