Advertisement
CuchuCachu

Diversity again

Nov 8th, 2017
66
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 1.36 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Ah, yes... my favorite. Europeans with minimal genetic and cultural distance were able to come together as Americans (after World War II with unprecedented State interference) so therefore we will be able to do it with people who have nothing in common.
  2.  
  3. Reason, we cant even make black people agree with free speech. As yougov's surveys on partisan opposition to it show it being driven by blacks and hispanics from the Democrats
  4.  
  5. And you have absolutely no way of converting Hispanics to small government.
  6.  
  7. And again, nothing you said contradicts the empirical evidence that this kind of racial diversity is bad.
  8.  
  9. Moreover, Putnam is the beginning of the anti-diversity stuff. Not the end. Altright blogger Heartiste has kindly compiled a list of his favorite studies just for people like the author. I cant like it because Reason is terrible so just google diversity + proximity = conflict and Heartiste. It will be called "the reference list"
  10.  
  11. And Putnam's predictions of a new identity are based on nothing much at all. Such as social contact theory originating in the Army during World War II. You know, not a remotely generalizible situation.
  12.  
  13. And also, he ignores the question of it the new identity will be worth a damn or not.
  14.  
  15. I can tell people like Reason magazine right now, it will be more hostile to libertarianism based on the statism of the New Americans.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement