10 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-31 1600 +Mitch Conner

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-31 1600 +Mitch Conner
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xA_RTMLbThk&google_comment_id=z13euxvj3qi4zvqwc04cczaovlfaungwxp40k
https://pastebin.com/g1Ka1DWs
__


+Mitch Conner __ [I ask a question in a moment] The link may not have worked as it is just about "myaccount.google.com".

"Brian Hill" had a mental breakdown a couple of weeks/months ago and has been going nuts at me ever since (he has an oppositional defiance disorder).

__

That she might be holding onto a *cane* is interesting. I am trying an experiment in private but really need to try it out on someone *who actually does not believe the woman has interviewed herself.*

Would you be willing to go through a "process" with me? I will give a sample of the "process" below so you know what you are getting into.

I will put it on my Google Plus rather than here (this isn't an appropriate thread). *If you want it to be private and only the two of us* - that's fine (and I won't share our conversation with anyone).

Ideally I would like other eyes on it so they can see how it unfolds - those people would be: Terran, cabadejo and nationalparksign - not so that they can jump in or "hate on you" [which they would never do] - but to *observe* the "process" I am trying to figure out.

We can also stop it at any time. We can carry it out over as long a time as you want (it really shouldn't take all that long to go through).

The key point is this: *It is not about convincing you she has interviewed herself - it is about identifying the "blocking belief" - that belief which is preventing you from seeing it as a "self interview".*

That's all it is. And it does not mean you must then waltz about believing she interviewed herself. It's not about that - it's only about exploring beliefs - and identifying the "deal breaker" belief. The one that is an "obstacle" to seeing it as a self-interview.

The last thing I want to do is spook you, offend you, hassle you etc. *So if you don't want to participate that is understood!*

I have not yet gone through this process to completion because the few people I've tried it with in the past have had an oppositional defiance disorder and just refuse to cooperate. (If I ask "Is it raining where you are?" they will ramble about how there is no such thing as rain.)

To give you an indication as to the kind of things I will ask - I'll give you the first two questions below (the first question we can know the answer to).

If you're willing to participate - let me know here. I would ideally like to make it a public post on my Google Plus - _but as I say_ - I understand that you may not want that.

*Whatever you want to do will suit me.* I just need someone willing to go through this process for at least a couple of questions!

__
HERE ARE THE KIND OF THINGS YOU WOULD BE ASKED DURING THE "PROCESS":


Q1) *Are we supposed to believe that someone else had interviewed the woman?* That is to say - are we supposed to believe that there is someone else with her? (In addition to the autistic kid)

Yes or no? If no, please explain. If yes, then unless you have an objection or something you would like to say let us continue to the next question.

[I would assume your answer is "yes" to that!]
__

Q2) The absence of an interviewer does not mean there is no interviewer but at the same time if there is no interviewer then there can be no evidence of one either.

With that in mind - *is there anything that necessarily proves there was an interviewer with the woman and child?*

Yes or no? If yes, what? If no, then unless you have an objection or something you would like to say let us continue to the next question.

__


These are the first two questions in a series of simple YES/NO questions.

*The purpose of these questions is to (as quickly as possible) isolate and identify the "blocking belief"* - that which is causing you to not see it as a "self interview".

The strategy is to "narrow things down by halves" to find where the "blocking belief" is coming from.

*If you would like to participate in this - please let me know by saying "okay" etc.*

There are no trick questions. There are no threatening questions. There are no personal questions. There are no questions designed to "make you look stupid". What you see above is the kind of questions that will be asked.

Feel free to stop at any time - in fact - if you abort at any time you can tell me why and it will be helpful when trying it in future.

If you're okay with this - I'll create a dedicated Google Plus post and reference you. If you want it to be strictly private - it will just be the two of us.

If you want it to be semi-private then I'll loop in Terran, cabadejo and nationalparksign but they will be observers only and not interrupt.

If you are happy for everyone else to see our conversation then I'll make it public.

Don't worry! There's no pressure! I don't expect that you will want to participate so I am not expecting you to want to go ahead with this. I am not disappointed if you don't want to - or are busy - or anything else.

I just think you would make a good "test subject"!


__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w