ChatGPT's views on the seperation of human-generated content and computer-generated content (3.5)

User:
If AI art has no copyright (even if slightly edited), then neither does text. If so, should I separate out (copyrighted) human-generated text from (no-copyright) computer-generated text? If so, how?

ChatGPT:
It is important to note that the issue of copyright in AI-generated text is still a topic of debate and has not been fully resolved. While it is true that in many jurisdictions, AI-generated works may not be protected by copyright, there are still many nuances and gray areas that need to be considered.

That being said, if you are using a combination of human-generated and computer-generated text in your work, it may be a good idea to clearly indicate which portions of the text are generated by AI and which are created by humans.

One way to do this could be to use different formatting or styling for the AI-generated text, such as using a different font or color. You could also consider including a disclaimer or attribution statement in your work to clarify the source of the text.

Ultimately, the best approach will depend on the specific context of your work and the requirements of the relevant copyright laws in your jurisdiction. It may be helpful to consult with a legal professional with expertise in intellectual property law to ensure that you are in compliance with all relevant regulations.
---
In another context window, where I engaged in conversation about this issue, I asked for more specific methods as well.

ChatGPT:
When intermixing human-generated text with computer-generated text, it is important to indicate which sections are human-generated and which are not. This can be achieved in various ways, depending on the specific context and purpose of the work. Here are some possible approaches:

1. Use formatting: You can use different formatting styles for the human-generated text and computer-generated text. For example, you can use italics, bold, or different font styles to indicate which sections are computer-generated.

2. Use labels: You can use labels or annotations to indicate which sections are computer-generated. For example, you can use parentheses or brackets to enclose computer-generated sections or use labels such as "Generated by AI" or "Auto-generated."

3. Separate sections: You can separate human-generated and computer-generated sections into different paragraphs or sections. For example, you can start each section with a heading that indicates whether it is human-generated or computer-generated.

4. Provide a key: You can provide a key or legend that explains how to differentiate between human-generated and computer-generated text.

User:
Explain what you mean by key.

ChatGPT:
It is important to ensure that your readers understand which sections of your text are human-generated and which are computer-generated. By providing clear indicators, you can help your readers understand the content and context of your work.
Explain what you mean by a key.

A key, in the context of mixed human- and computer-generated text, is a guide that explains how to differentiate between the two types of content. A key can be a separate section of the work or an accompanying document that provides a legend or a set of instructions for understanding the work.

The purpose of a key is to provide clarity and transparency to the reader about the source and nature of the content. For example, a key might indicate that all text in bold is computer-generated, while all other text is human-generated. Alternatively, a key might use symbols, colors, or other visual cues to distinguish between the two types of content.

Providing a key can be particularly useful when the mixed content is complex or technical. For instance, in a scientific article that includes computer-generated data, a key can be used to clarify which sections are generated by an algorithm and which sections are written by human authors.

By providing a clear and concise key, you can ensure that your readers understand the source and nature of the content in your work.
---
In a new context window, I asked ChatGPT to validate my preferred approach to indicating computer-generated text. It's a bit nonplussed about it.

User:
I want to provide attribution to computer-generated text to help readers separate out human-generated text from human-generated text. One approach I was thinking of involved having having an "Citation" appendix at the end of the novel, indicating where certain material came from. Here are two sample citations that it used:

"Society had become ... even further. Catch-22." is from private notes on Alpha Complex, All rights reserved. Quote modified from original - original quote is "Society had become ... even further. Catch-22."

"But a fortunate ... Alpha Complex dies." is from https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Machine_Stops/Chapter_III, the public domain. Quote modified from original - original quote is "Those who had ... as we know.

Would this approach work as a way of separating out human-generated text from computer-generated text?

ChatGPT:
Providing attribution in an appendix at the end of a novel can certainly help readers understand which portions of the text were generated by a computer program, and it's a good approach to take. The citations you've provided seem clear and informative, and would help readers understand the source of the text. However, it's important to note that the effectiveness of this approach may depend on the context in which the novel is presented and the expectations of the readers.

If the novel is presented as a work of experimental or artificial intelligence (AI) literature, then readers may expect some or all of the text to be generated by a computer program, and may not require explicit attribution for every generated passage. In such cases, you might choose to provide a general statement or disclaimer at the beginning of the novel indicating that the text was generated or co-created by an AI system.

On the other hand, if the novel is presented as a work of traditional literature, then readers may not expect any of the text to be generated by a computer program, and may be surprised or confused to encounter such passages. In this case, providing explicit citations can help readers understand the source and nature of the text, but it may also disrupt the flow of the narrative or create a sense of detachment or artificiality.

Ultimately, the best approach will depend on your goals and the expectations of your audience. Consider the context in which your novel will be presented, and experiment with different ways of providing attribution to see what works best for your readers.

User:
This novel would be a work of traditional literature. So if explicit citations disrupt the flow of narrative or create a sense of detachment or artificiality, what should I do instead?

ChatGPT:
If you're concerned that explicit citations in an appendix may disrupt the flow of the narrative or create a sense of detachment or artificiality, there are a few other options you could consider:

1. Incorporate the generated text into the narrative: Rather than presenting the generated text as a separate entity with a citation, you could integrate it into the narrative as seamlessly as possible. For example, you could use it as dialogue for a character, or incorporate it into a character's thoughts or inner monologue. This approach may help to reduce the sense of detachment or artificiality that could be caused by explicit citations.

2. Indicate the source in the text itself: If you prefer not to integrate the generated text into the narrative, you could indicate the source of the text directly in the text itself. For example, you could use a different font or formatting style for the generated text, or place it in brackets with a brief attribution (e.g., "[Generated text from AI program]"). This approach may help to reduce disruption to the narrative flow, while still providing readers with information about the source of the text.

3. Provide a general statement or disclaimer: Instead of providing explicit citations for each instance of generated text, you could include a general statement or disclaimer at the beginning of the novel indicating that some or all of the text was generated by an AI system. This approach may help to set readers' expectations for the novel, and reduce the need for frequent citations throughout the text.

Ultimately, the best approach will depend on your specific goals and the nature of the generated text in your novel. You may want to experiment with different approaches and seek feedback from beta readers or other writers to determine what works best for your particular project.