[redacted]

[23-Mar-20 05:54 AM] Coconut#8762
- Some council members believe that Cutiefly is autobanworthy.

[23-Mar-20 05:54 AM] Coconut#8762
is this accurate?

[23-Mar-20 05:54 AM] Coconut#8762
Do people actually believe that this mon is autobanworthy?

[23-Mar-20 05:55 AM] levi#6206
ya

[23-Mar-20 05:55 AM] levi#6206
like if we ban it now

[23-Mar-20 05:55 AM] levi#6206
that'd be an autoban

[23-Mar-20 05:55 AM] hongli#4483
i dont think people actually believed

[23-Mar-20 05:55 AM] levi#6206
no?

[23-Mar-20 05:55 AM] hongli#4483
it was in the same ranks as sneasel

[23-Mar-20 05:55 AM] hongli#4483
they were just saying that bc they wanted it gone immediately

[23-Mar-20 05:55 AM] hongli#4483
so we could do ruff suspect

[23-Mar-20 05:55 AM] hongli#4483
they weren't saying it in sincerity

[23-Mar-20 05:57 AM] levi#6206
well it doesnt have to be sneasel tier to be autobanworthy

[23-Mar-20 05:57 AM] levi#6206
it just has to be clearly broken

[23-Mar-20 05:57 AM] levi#6206
so like all 13 members of the council considering it busted

[23-Mar-20 05:58 AM] levi#6206
we added the autoban thing for recyclefloon/bulba

[23-Mar-20 05:59 AM] Ninja#8225
Yea I don’t think it’s sneasel but like if everyone thinks it’s clearly broken

[23-Mar-20 05:59 AM] Ninja#8225
I don’t see why not

[23-Mar-20 05:59 AM] levi#6206
also i fixed the link

[23-Mar-20 05:59 AM] levi#6206
not sure what happened

[23-Mar-20 05:59 AM] levi#6206
please like my post

[23-Mar-20 06:00 AM] Ninja#8225
I liked it

[23-Mar-20 06:00 AM] hongli#4483
wow 4 wow

[23-Mar-20 07:18 AM] LilyAC#7887
please remove the part where i say rufflet is literally corviknight in lc

[23-Mar-20 07:18 AM] LilyAC#7887
@levi

[23-Mar-20 07:18 AM] Coconut#8762
I don't think anyone considers cutiefly to be on the level

[23-Mar-20 07:18 AM] Coconut#8762
of swirlix.

[23-Mar-20 01:35 PM] levi#6206
ok fine I’ll remove it when I’m at comp

[23-Mar-20 01:36 PM] levi#6206
Also I don’t think it should be swirlix level to autoban, the bar for autobanning is just everyone agreeing

[23-Mar-20 01:37 PM] levi#6206
Trying to set a hard bar wrt mon viability to force an autoban seems like a p awful idea for obvious reasons I think

[23-Mar-20 01:45 PM] brewfasa#4532
it’s certainly more meta defining than swirlix

[23-Mar-20 01:46 PM] brewfasa#4532
agreed tho trying to compare too much is lame

[23-Mar-20 01:46 PM] brewfasa#4532
if 13-0 want to ban that’s a resounding ok in my book

[23-Mar-20 01:49 PM] BurntZebra#8147
was swirlix ever around long enough to be meta defining

[23-Mar-20 01:56 PM] brewfasa#4532
I mean it didn’t define much because it didn’t have answers, and was solely an offensive behemoth

[23-Mar-20 01:56 PM] brewfasa#4532
cuties webs, lo, qd, and scarf have a much bigger impact is my point

[25-Mar-20 12:03 AM] jake#8907
welcome @Pablo

[25-Mar-20 12:03 AM] Pablo#5523
yahallo

[25-Mar-20 12:03 AM] Ninja#8225
oml

[25-Mar-20 12:03 AM] Ninja#8225
poat

[25-Mar-20 12:25 AM] Pablo#5523
agree w banning cutie and rufflet btw

[25-Mar-20 12:08 PM] Shrug#7659
reiterating my gen 7 call to forbid sticky webs and flying z and to allow trapinch. i understand that this will not happen but im getting on the right side of history

[25-Mar-20 10:23 PM] jake#8907
we're not doing anything with gen 7 while we still have things to deal with in gen 8

[25-Mar-20 10:24 PM] jake#8907
anyway, i did have a conversation with hogg and some other Big Tiering People about the legitimacy of pushing a quickban here, and the fact that there are two potential suspects in front of our biggest community tour

[25-Mar-20 10:25 PM] jake#8907
https://i.imgur.com/jVxLyKk.png

{Embed}
https://imgur.com/jVxLyKk
https://i.imgur.com/jVxLyKk.png

[25-Mar-20 10:26 PM] jake#8907
regarding quickbans ^

[25-Mar-20 10:27 PM] jake#8907
he did also present an option that i felt was valuable to consider

[25-Mar-20 10:27 PM] jake#8907
https://i.imgur.com/3wchT9I.png

{Embed}
https://imgur.com/3wchT9I
https://i.imgur.com/3wchT9I.png

[25-Mar-20 10:27 PM] jake#8907
i am fairly uncomfortable with the notion of quickbanning something that has been around so long

[25-Mar-20 10:28 PM] jake#8907
not just because of smogon red tape, but because it's kind of superseding policy

[25-Mar-20 10:29 PM] jake#8907
i know the whole ss meta is going to be thrown for a loop between home, dlc, etc throughout its lifespan so we're really in new territory anyway

[25-Mar-20 10:29 PM] jake#8907
so i'm not outright opposed to the idea of quickbanning

[25-Mar-20 10:30 PM] jake#8907
but i do prefer presenting it the way hogg suggested and i think it's a way to balance our immediate needs and acknowledging that policy exists and we're not trying to step over it

[25-Mar-20 10:31 PM] jake#8907
please give me your thoughts when you have the chance @Council

[25-Mar-20 10:32 PM] starmaster#8286
nah a re-test before dlc is completely useless

[25-Mar-20 10:32 PM] starmaster#8286
so there’s no pt in going this route if it requires that

[25-Mar-20 10:33 PM] jake#8907
i'm not sure why he specified before dlc

[25-Mar-20 10:33 PM] hongli#4483
agree w star

[25-Mar-20 10:34 PM] Serene Grace#5243
Can we use LCPL as something that necessitates quick action
I feel like the policy is superseding common sense

[25-Mar-20 10:34 PM] Serene Grace#5243
Cutiefly will have a 90% ban rate just like alolan vulpix did

[25-Mar-20 10:34 PM] Pablo#5523
ye feels like everyone thinks its broken

[25-Mar-20 10:34 PM] starmaster#8286
ya

[25-Mar-20 10:34 PM] Pablo#5523
no point in having it for 2 weeks or w/e in lcpl

[25-Mar-20 10:35 PM] hongli#4483
could the tier be considered still in beta

[25-Mar-20 10:35 PM] Serene Grace#5243
although it is worth nothing drifloon had 100% council ban support at the time of the vote

[25-Mar-20 10:35 PM] hongli#4483
since we're not too far away from home being released

[25-Mar-20 10:35 PM] hongli#4483
so it's still like the beginning of a tier

[25-Mar-20 10:35 PM] Pablo#5523
and lcpl being rn feels like ground for quick action

[25-Mar-20 10:35 PM] jake#8907
afaik beta is exclusively for like

[25-Mar-20 10:35 PM] jake#8907
uu ru nu pu

[25-Mar-20 10:35 PM] starmaster#8286
yea it’s only for usage tiers

[25-Mar-20 10:35 PM] jake#8907
where the tier doesn't exist yet but can be "assumed" based on stats

[25-Mar-20 10:35 PM] Coconut#8762
We're not in beta

[25-Mar-20 10:35 PM] Serene Grace#5243
I understand the reasoning behind wanting suspect tests, but cant we have common sense exceptions

[25-Mar-20 10:36 PM] starmaster#8286
I feel like we can use the fact that we just banned shit after home and lcpl soon as a reason to quickban when the council is 13-0 for it

[25-Mar-20 10:36 PM] starmaster#8286
but if hogg is rly opposed to that

[25-Mar-20 10:36 PM] starmaster#8286
Then wrap

[25-Mar-20 10:36 PM] jake#8907
to be clear

[25-Mar-20 10:36 PM] jake#8907
he didn't say he was opposed

[25-Mar-20 10:36 PM] jake#8907
basically the gist of the convo was that

[25-Mar-20 10:37 PM] jake#8907
i think it's possible but we rly have to acknowledge the fact that it's unprecedented currently and that this kind of thing won't be happening frequently

[25-Mar-20 10:37 PM] Coconut#8762
he wants to make sure this won't become a regular thing

[25-Mar-20 10:37 PM] jake#8907
& we should really make sure that it's the right thing to do rather than us just making the decision of the top you know

[25-Mar-20 10:38 PM] Coconut#8762
which is sensible

[25-Mar-20 10:38 PM] jake#8907
yea

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] starmaster#8286
yea ig setting a precedent for quickbans after the beginning of a meta is “dangerous” but I think if we make a clear point of explaining the exceptional circumstances

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] Coconut#8762
he also wants to make sure

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] starmaster#8286
it’s ok

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] Coconut#8762
we have clear community backing

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] Coconut#8762
when we make decisions like this

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] jake#8907
yes

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] starmaster#8286
that we definitely do I think

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] Serene Grace#5243
how do we measure community backing

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] Coconut#8762
I think we do for cutiefly

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] jake#8907
not opposition

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] Coconut#8762
I don't think it's as crystal clear for rufflet

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] jake#8907
it's not very measurable

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] starmaster#8286
it’s not remotely clear for ruff

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] starmaster#8286
But we’re not doing ruff rn

[25-Mar-20 10:39 PM] starmaster#8286
I thought

[25-Mar-20 10:40 PM] jake#8907
but basically we just need to be sure that the council isn't just doing whatever it wants to the tier serene

[25-Mar-20 10:40 PM] Coconut#8762
not at the current moment

[25-Mar-20 10:40 PM] Serene Grace#5243
for example does Alan_testing in lc discord saying that he thinks cutiefly should be free

[25-Mar-20 10:40 PM] Serene Grace#5243
count as opposition

[25-Mar-20 10:40 PM] starmaster#8286
a serious post in the thread would count

[25-Mar-20 10:40 PM] Coconut#8762
if he can put up a half-witted argument

[25-Mar-20 10:40 PM] starmaster#8286
As far as I’m concerned

[25-Mar-20 10:40 PM] Coconut#8762
yes

[25-Mar-20 10:40 PM] jake#8907
agreed

[25-Mar-20 10:40 PM] jake#8907
i don't know if we need to draw the line at unanimous consent in this case

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] Coconut#8762
essentially, mk writing a post saying how we should focus on manual sun instead

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] jake#8907
but yea serious opposition to the decision means we would probably need to backpedal and do it the normal way

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] Coconut#8762
is not going to stop us

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] levi#6206
there were a couple posts in the meta discussion thread at the start of march

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] levi#6206
that claimed cutie to be ok

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] Coconut#8762
but that post getting ten likes might mean we need to reconsider

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] levi#6206
i guess

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] levi#6206
all the recent posts since shrug's have been pro-ban tho

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] levi#6206
also

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] levi#6206
serenegrace13Today at 10:35 PM
although it is worth nothing drifloon had 100% council ban support at the time of the vote

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] levi#6206
this wasnt true

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] levi#6206
anyways

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] Pablo#5523
dumbass levi and doka

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] Serene Grace#5243
it literally was

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] Serene Grace#5243
at the time of the vote

[25-Mar-20 10:41 PM] Coconut#8762
no

[25-Mar-20 10:42 PM] Serene Grace#5243
X-0

[25-Mar-20 10:42 PM] levi#6206
i was opposed and fatty was borderline

[25-Mar-20 10:42 PM] levi#6206
7-1 out of 9

[25-Mar-20 10:42 PM] Serene Grace#5243
at the time of whatever vote, it was X-0

[25-Mar-20 10:42 PM] Coconut#8762
idk if levi was opposed to a suspect

[25-Mar-20 10:42 PM] Coconut#8762
but he would have voted DNB

[25-Mar-20 10:42 PM] jake#8907
didn't you actually vote dnb anyway levi

[25-Mar-20 10:42 PM] levi#6206
ya

[25-Mar-20 10:42 PM] Coconut#8762
yes.

[25-Mar-20 10:42 PM] starmaster#8286
autism moment

[25-Mar-20 10:43 PM] Coconut#8762
what a bad suspect that was

[25-Mar-20 10:43 PM] levi#6206
only member of the council on the right side of history

[25-Mar-20 10:43 PM] levi#6206
:/

[25-Mar-20 10:43 PM] Serene Grace#5243

{Attachments}
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/231290339128770560/692564278938697738/unknown.png

[25-Mar-20 10:43 PM] Coconut#8762
like no voters

[25-Mar-20 10:43 PM] starmaster#8286
ye

[25-Mar-20 10:43 PM] levi#6206
fatty and i were undecided and i was alr dnb

[25-Mar-20 10:43 PM] Coconut#8762
and it was a month before

[25-Mar-20 10:43 PM] levi#6206
by the time the suspect came around

[25-Mar-20 10:43 PM] Coconut#8762
we actually got a change

[25-Mar-20 10:43 PM] Coconut#8762
that made us autoban it

[25-Mar-20 10:43 PM] Coconut#8762
what a bad, bad suspect

[25-Mar-20 10:43 PM] levi#6206
the month before thing should never matter ever

[25-Mar-20 10:44 PM] starmaster#8286
I mean it woulda been fine if we didn’t make the reqs too hard or if more of the council actually got reqs

[25-Mar-20 10:44 PM] hongli#4483
we didnt know it would be a month or not

[25-Mar-20 10:44 PM] starmaster#8286
Or levi wasn’t a retard

[25-Mar-20 10:44 PM] starmaster#8286
Any of those things

[25-Mar-20 10:44 PM] hongli#4483
at the time

[25-Mar-20 10:44 PM] Coconut#8762
Well we knew it was coming and it was coming soon

[25-Mar-20 10:44 PM] levi#6206
even if we had a hard deadline of a month

[25-Mar-20 10:44 PM] levi#6206
it shouldnt have mattered at all

[25-Mar-20 10:44 PM] levi#6206
we should never change a current meta based on what might happen in the future

[25-Mar-20 10:44 PM] levi#6206
it doesnt make any sense

[25-Mar-20 10:44 PM] levi#6206
it made even less sense for spl season

[25-Mar-20 10:45 PM] levi#6206
assuming you agreed floon wasnt broken

[25-Mar-20 10:45 PM] levi#6206
bc it would be impacting the second most important tour for a mechanic that didnt exist yet

[25-Mar-20 10:45 PM] levi#6206
actually 3rd

[25-Mar-20 10:45 PM] levi#6206
lcwc lcpl spl

[redacted]

[25-Mar-20 10:45 PM] Coconut#8762
I mean policy wise it's sensible

[redacted]

[25-Mar-20 10:45 PM] Coconut#8762
but it wasn't a good suspect

[25-Mar-20 10:45 PM] hongli#4483
hypothetically speaking if there's a mon that's getting banned in a month regardless and there's more pressing issues to deal with

[redacted]

[25-Mar-20 10:45 PM] Serene Grace#5243
Back to the point,
I think we should quick ban Cutiefly under the pretext that lcpl is coming soon, its unanimous, and in the future we would only quick ban with similar exceptional circumstances as well

[25-Mar-20 10:45 PM] jake#8907
right right

[25-Mar-20 10:46 PM] hongli#4483
i dont think it would be bad

[25-Mar-20 10:46 PM] hongli#4483
but i dont think there was anything beyond drifloon at that point

[25-Mar-20 10:46 PM] Coconut#8762
I'm going to make another post

[25-Mar-20 10:46 PM] Coconut#8762
reiterating that if you disagree with cutiefly being banned

[25-Mar-20 10:46 PM] Coconut#8762
now or never

[25-Mar-20 10:46 PM] Coconut#8762
and then if no one posts opposing it

[25-Mar-20 10:46 PM] levi#6206
sounds good

[25-Mar-20 10:46 PM] levi#6206
dont forget to tag heysup

[25-Mar-20 10:46 PM] Coconut#8762
we greenlight it

[25-Mar-20 10:46 PM] Serene Grace#5243

{Attachments}
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/231290339128770560/692565214381604955/unknown.png

[redacted]

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] jake#8907
that's fine with me

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] hongli#4483
did heysup post

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] hongli#4483
for apix suspect

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] Coconut#8762
probs not

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] jake#8907
minus tagging do not tag pls

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] jake#8907
no

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] jake#8907
hardly anyone posted for apix

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] hongli#4483
he hasn't had a wrong take since the start of the gen then

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] Serene Grace#5243
does heysup posting in support of free cutiefly count as opposition

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] starmaster#8286
heysup posting in opposition should count as support

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] Serene Grace#5243
enough to not quick ban

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] starmaster#8286
Yea

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] hongli#4483
i think heysup would be pro qt ban

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] starmaster#8286
heysup is LITERALLY always

[25-Mar-20 10:47 PM] starmaster#8286
On the wrong side

[25-Mar-20 10:48 PM] hongli#4483
he was anti floon ban

[25-Mar-20 10:48 PM] levi#6206
well

[25-Mar-20 10:48 PM] hongli#4483
goat

[25-Mar-20 10:48 PM] levi#6206
he was right for drifloon

[25-Mar-20 10:48 PM] levi#6206
ya

[25-Mar-20 10:48 PM] Pablo#5523
just defog the webs with cottonee bros

[25-Mar-20 10:48 PM] Serene Grace#5243

{Attachments}
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/231290339128770560/692565570838724748/unknown.png

[25-Mar-20 10:48 PM] jake#8907
i have to support a player who is willing to bring sewaddle to a serious tournament game

[25-Mar-20 10:48 PM] Serene Grace#5243
@levi

[25-Mar-20 10:48 PM] hongli#4483
levi brought sewaddle vs me

[25-Mar-20 10:48 PM] levi#6206
is that for like

[25-Mar-20 10:48 PM] hongli#4483
in spl

[redacted]

[25-Mar-20 10:51 PM] Coconut#8762
LCPL has a high standard of names.

[25-Mar-20 10:51 PM] Serene Grace#5243
the Kawaii Xayah12345s will have its day eventually

[redacted]

[28-Mar-20 10:34 PM] levi#6206
Do we vote tomorrow?

[redacted]

[29-Mar-20 06:28 PM] hongli#4483
it's been a week now ya

[29-Mar-20 06:28 PM] hongli#4483
we should officially do a vote

[29-Mar-20 06:29 PM] hongli#4483
i dont think mk's suggestion of banning QD rather than qtfly counts as dissent does it

[29-Mar-20 06:32 PM] levi#6206
we could include that in our vote too but i definitely dont agree

[29-Mar-20 06:32 PM] levi#6206
i dont think qd is close to cutie's biggest strength

[29-Mar-20 06:32 PM] Pablo#5523
webs is far more unhealthy than qd

[29-Mar-20 06:33 PM] starmaster#8286
ye

[29-Mar-20 06:33 PM] starmaster#8286
we should vote rn

[29-Mar-20 06:33 PM] starmaster#8286
ban.

[29-Mar-20 06:33 PM] hongli#4483
i think even w.o qd it'd be broken yea

[29-Mar-20 06:33 PM] hongli#4483
ban

[29-Mar-20 06:33 PM] starmaster#8286
@Council

[29-Mar-20 06:33 PM] Shrug#7659
ban

[29-Mar-20 06:33 PM] levi#6206
ban

[29-Mar-20 06:33 PM] Pablo#5523
ban

[29-Mar-20 06:34 PM] Luthier#1578
byebye

[29-Mar-20 06:35 PM] LilyAC#7887
ban 😢

[29-Mar-20 06:37 PM] BurntZebra#8147
Ban

[29-Mar-20 06:38 PM] brewfasa#4532
ban

[29-Mar-20 06:44 PM] starmaster#8286
majority achieved but lets get the rest in

[29-Mar-20 06:44 PM] starmaster#8286
actually we need more ig

[29-Mar-20 06:44 PM] starmaster#8286
for w/e number we set

[29-Mar-20 06:44 PM] hongli#4483
wasnt it we needed 4 ppl to vote no ban for quick bans not to go through

[29-Mar-20 06:45 PM] hongli#4483
so we still need 2 more ppl

[29-Mar-20 06:45 PM] jake#8907
i would vote ban

[29-Mar-20 06:51 PM] starmaster#8286
this should be 14-0 anyway

[29-Mar-20 06:51 PM] starmaster#8286
but 9-0 rn

[29-Mar-20 06:51 PM] starmaster#8286
o i cant count

[29-Mar-20 06:51 PM] starmaster#8286
10-0

[29-Mar-20 07:00 PM] Ninja#8225
ban

[29-Mar-20 07:14 PM] Kingler#6931
How long is the vote till

[29-Mar-20 07:15 PM] Kingler#6931
I’m like a 95% ban anyway but I’ll see a few replays just to confirm

[29-Mar-20 07:15 PM] Kingler#6931
Rip qt

[29-Mar-20 07:27 PM] Luthier#1578
ill send one @Kingler

[29-Mar-20 07:28 PM] Luthier#1578
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/smogtours-gen8lc-478622

{Embed}
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/smogtours-gen8lc-478622
[Gen 8] LC replay: Alkione vs. GOAO - Pokémon Showdown
Watch a replay of a Pokémon battle between Alkione and GOAO ([Gen 8] LC)

[29-Mar-20 09:31 PM] Serene Grace#5243
Ban

[29-Mar-20 09:51 PM] starmaster#8286
ok its officially banned w/ 11

[29-Mar-20 09:52 PM] Pablo#5523
post it rn so its official for d4 of corona

[29-Mar-20 09:52 PM] starmaster#8286
thatd be nice

[29-Mar-20 09:52 PM] starmaster#8286
we could enforce it for this ssnl round too

[29-Mar-20 09:52 PM] starmaster#8286
@jake

[29-Mar-20 10:25 PM] Coconut#8762
too late for corona

[29-Mar-20 10:25 PM] Coconut#8762
ssnl maybe

[29-Mar-20 10:26 PM] jake#8907
gonna need a bit to write it upespecially since it is unprecedented

[29-Mar-20 10:27 PM] jake#8907
i will require a post from everyone about your thoughts/opinions though

[29-Mar-20 10:28 PM] jake#8907
not a post but a short msg that i can edit into the banpost rather

[29-Mar-20 10:52 PM] jake#8907
we actually need 12/14

[29-Mar-20 10:52 PM] jake#8907
ftr

[29-Mar-20 10:53 PM] Ninja#8225
we have 12 dont we

[29-Mar-20 10:53 PM] jake#8907
do we

[29-Mar-20 10:53 PM] jake#8907
i havent written them out yet

[29-Mar-20 10:53 PM] Ninja#8225
everyone but coco and kingler i think

[29-Mar-20 10:53 PM] jake#8907
i just saw star's msg

[29-Mar-20 10:53 PM] hongli#4483
serene is 12th

[29-Mar-20 10:53 PM] hongli#4483
i believe

[29-Mar-20 10:53 PM] hongli#4483
also my b i thought the percentage was 4 ppl against

[29-Mar-20 10:53 PM] hongli#4483
rather than 3

[29-Mar-20 10:54 PM] Coconut#8762
I blind voted ban

[29-Mar-20 10:59 PM] jake#8907
@Luthier and @Kingler are left to vote

[29-Mar-20 11:29 PM] jake#8907
https://i.imgur.com/y0Rmojl.png

{Embed}
https://imgur.com/y0Rmojl
https://i.imgur.com/y0Rmojl.png

[29-Mar-20 11:29 PM] jake#8907
thoughts on the wording / if i have forgotten anything

[29-Mar-20 11:29 PM] jake#8907
i've looked at it long enough that i'm bound to have missed something or said something incorrectly

[29-Mar-20 11:29 PM] jake#8907
everyone's paragraphs will be edited in below this as per usual with quickbans

[29-Mar-20 11:45 PM] Kingler#6931
sure. BAN it

[30-Mar-20 02:10 AM] Luthier#1578
@jake did bye bye not suffice

[30-Mar-20 02:10 AM] Luthier#1578
😢

[30-Mar-20 12:37 PM] jake#8907
would it have sufficed if it were an official thread :angery:

[30-Mar-20 12:37 PM] jake#8907
(i just missed it)

[30-Mar-20 12:37 PM] jake#8907
ok it goes up tn when im home

[30-Mar-20 08:32 PM] brewfasa#4532
can we qb ruff too so we can move onto arena trap

[30-Mar-20 08:36 PM] Pablo#5523
might as well ban ponyta too

[30-Mar-20 08:36 PM] Pablo#5523
if we get rid of arena trap

[30-Mar-20 08:37 PM] Serene Grace#5243
Vhue was right, council is ban happy