6 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-17 1830 +quasidiem99

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-17 1830 +quasidiem99
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGog8Bdy0aI&lc=z135yrzi5yvkzbygl04cjvwifmu1ixl51tg0k
https://pastebin.com/fZMs23PN
__



+quasidiem99  __ Please read this reply it contains notes that many people seem to not understand. 1) The "astronaut" in the background changes radically as though a significant period of time has elapsed whereas the "astronaut" in the foreground remains wearing the same clothing and is consistent with a person who has experienced only a brief period of elapsed time.






2) Even with that in mind the *only point and purpose of this video is to show a categorical and undeniable edit* has definitely been done during this clip. The edit is undeniable. That's the first step!






3) Furthermore, the edit (or "joining"/"stitching") commenced as he brought the toothbrush to his mouth. If it were a simple "mistake" then why switch in the middle of the motion? Why not make the switch after he had brought the toothbrush to his mouth or why not just do an obvious and categorical edit as "NASA" so often do. That is to say: why even bother trying to synchronise the two clips? Why go to the trouble of making the motion appear seamless?






4) We can discard the idea of the edit being done due to a "mistake". Why? Because as he is brushing his teeth the two different scenes are blended together! It alternates between both pieces of footage! In both pieces of footage he has toothpaste in his mouth! And it switches back to the original clip when it is time to spit it out.






5) To repeat the first point: we know that a potentially significant period of time has passed between the two versions/edits because the person in the background is either different (though I will accept it's the same person) OR AT THE VERY LEAST is wearing a DIFFERENT shirt! That is profoundly significant! That suggests a completely different day!






What that means is that this scene was not just shot twice but shot at different times. It wasn't as though he made a "mistake" and they reshot the scene a few minutes later. A significant period of time elapsed before shooting it the second time. And the fact they used both clips suggests it wasn't much of a "mistake" anyway! (Again - that's assuming it was due to a "mistake" but if the reason for the second version was because of a "mistake" then we would probably not expect the footage from the first version/clip/edit to have been used!)






All in all what we are shown is something that has been stitched together to make it appear as though it is a single clip (with the only clue being that the person in the background changes positions [and shirts!] radically! Although despite the background change we are also alerted to it being a different clip/edit because the "astronaut's" facial expression and body position is also different but that is more subtle (it's obvious but most people would probably not notice it).






It must be mentioned again that despite the background person radically changing the foreground "astronaut" appears more or less the same! He appears to be wearing the same shirt despite the fact we know a lot of time could have elapsed because the background person is definitely wearing a different shirt (if it's the same person - which it appears to be - but if it isn't then that also suggests a goodly amount of elapsed time!).






If you're going to go to all of that trouble why not just reshoot the entire scene and use that? Why go to the additional time and trouble to blend at least TWO takes together?!






Why go to the time, trouble and effort of stitching the footage together during the smooth motion of brining the toothbrush to his mouth?






*It is an awful lot of time, trouble and effort just to show us a few seconds of an alleged "astronaut" brushing his teeth!*






As I began by saying: *this video is only about proving an undeniable sneaky edit took place.* It was done in such a way so as to appear seamless but upon scrutiny we find numerous troubling problems with it. This video cannot speculate as to WHY that may be the case. After all, it could be that the background is purely green-screen and "they" mixed in the wrong background for the zoomed out and zoomed in segments. But that is not something I can comment on because not only could it be wrong I cannot prove it even if it were correct *and it is unwise to speculate on a trick's methodology.* It is fun to speculate and whenever I speculate it is for fun only (*I never seriously assert HOW a trick could be done - though for fun I might speculate.*)






Hopefully this has helped to elevate the seriousness of what has been pointed out. From the comments I've received it does not seem apparent that these things have occurred to anyone. *I am building a case against "NASA" which will comprehensively and thoroughly destroy them.* This is just one piece of evidence in that process. By posting these kinds of videos I can get feedback on them to see where people are having difficulties and to see what "excuses" (or "plausible explanations") are being offered.






That way when I get around to putting together my case against "NASA" it will be solid and as undeniable as the edit we see in this video. *I have an example of a perfectly SMOOTH edit made by "NASA" where there is absolutely no visible clue that an edit has occurred.* But there is a way to prove it has happened (and I am keeping that footage to myself for the time being).





__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w