API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Guest User

Plan/b/

a guest
Aug 4th, 2011
2,813
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 6.62 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  2.  
  3. ################################# OpPlanB #################################
  4.  
  5. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  6.  
  7. ### What is our aim?
  8.  
  9. We dont want to stop the plan but we want him to show that some things they do are not compatible to the ideas behind Anonymous.
  10.  
  11. ### Why ThePlan acts against the ideas behind Anonymous?
  12.  
  13. First off all the worst: censorship. Many users observed that nearly every thread or post which critize WITP, no matter if its objective or destrutive, get edited, moved into /b/ or even deleted. Sometimes it's even unable to write further post in that thread. Proofs can be found nearly everywhere in forums especially in /b/'s, take a look around. Moreover you even go that far to ban peoples for objective opinions.
  14.  
  15. Second thing is profite motive. Surely we cannot proof it. WITP has to proof it does not. So if you look around the forums you will find some dozens of threads where people asking for more transparency. Instead of giving answers, the donation-button was deleted. The shop ist still alive, making 12-20% profit ( http://owely.com/5Ks97W ). We found some screenshots and want to publish them, they show that the forum itselfs costs around 12$ a month and another strange censored payment of 200$ for irc setup and maintenance ( http://i41.servimg.com/u/f41/16/71/98/87/transa10.jpg ). Here are some older donations ( http://i591.photobucket.com/albums/ss353/freedominfonetwork/screenscopy-1.jpg ; http://i591.photobucket.com/albums/ss353/freedominfonetwork/screenscopy-2.jpg ) - but at least it not shows where they were spended.
  16.  
  17. ### What WITP accomplished to become more anonymous?
  18.  
  19. * Registration with TOR(+FoxyProxy) and most VPN's work
  20. * You can view a lot of threads without registration
  21. * Better integration of community in decisions about new operations (manual vote system, mods move ops)
  22.  
  23. ### What WITP want to do?
  24.  
  25. * Moar integration of the community in decisions about new operations (automatic vote system, which moves staging ops into active or dying ops)
  26. * Moar integration of the community to clean up the forums (votesystem on threads and posts to hide pervtered posts or move adverse threads into /b/, so community can decide wich form of critic is welcome)
  27. * Distance from Forumotion
  28. * More anonymous infrastructure http://pastebin.com/dJXtnxzH
  29.  
  30. ### What WITP should do furthermore?
  31.  
  32. * Close shop, stop selling Anonymous-Merchandise for profit! ( http://www.cafepress.com/whatistheplan )
  33. * Allow posts as "Anonymous" with no connection to a registered name
  34. * Allow posts without registration
  35. * No hidden forums
  36.  
  37. ### What about Xenony?
  38.  
  39. He is just the founder of the channel #OpPlanB of AnonOps, nothing more. He is no leader, no fag trolled WITP with destrutive shit or a fed like the mod Fighter From a Distance (FFaD) claimed him to be.
  40. FFaD has taken his critics personally, so he just is on personal assault right now. On another pastebin ( http://pastebin.com/7C1b2J7e ) he claimed Xenony initiated #OpPlanB was banned for trolling and fed. To give other just one example, this is the post he got banned for ( http://www.whatis-theplan.org/t5765p36-irc-dead-fuhung-von-theplan-exposed-usual-chan-bsns-is-usual ). He also told he was involved with Shrew and #OpGentrification and he can proofs it with some logs. So lets have a look at the logs: http://pastebin.com/HQvHen2a
  41. 03[02:26] * Xenony (society@is.brainwashed) has joined #OpGentrification
  42. 02[04:20] * Xenony (society@is.brainwashed) Quit (Quit: )
  43. What the... he joined and leaved... he MUST BE one the leaders. He told he dont even know shrew and disagrees with DDoS, hack or dox WITP within #OpPlanB. Fail claims are fail.
  44.  
  45. ### Just a log for teh lulz
  46.  
  47. -- AnonOps #OpPlanB --
  48. [08:08] -Merkel:#OpPlanB- Channel Topic: WhatIs-ThePlan.org should have expected Plan /b/ | WorkPad: http://anonpad.org/planb | Videos: http://bit.ly/om7Fj1 http://bit.ly/qJhl02 | We dont want em to stop their plan - we want to become more anonlike or distance from anonymous, because we wont tolerate censorship and profite motive inside Anonymous
  49. -- just because it's important to know what the topic is --
  50. [10:11] <FighterFaD> xenony, it seems like this channel only exists to stir up shit
  51. [10:12] <FighterFaD> hell have you ever done anything useful?
  52. [10:15] <FighterFaD> "i've already made up my mind, don't confuse me with the facts."
  53. ...
  54. [10:50] <FighterFaD> xenony this is what i really think. you want to gather a following to yourself by criticizing others unfairly
  55. [10:50] <Xenony> yea i know
  56. [10:50] <Xenony> you take it personally
  57. [10:51] <Xenony> but thats ur fault, not mine
  58. [10:51] <FighterFaD> y'all niggas are sitting in a troll channel
  59. [10:51] <Xenony> we dont critize OTHERS or theplan itself, we critize the way it works
  60. [10:51] <Xenony> stay objective..
  61. [10:54] * flabbergaster (Mibbit@AN-mb1.nk3.ltijg6.IP) Quit (Quit: http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client)
  62. [10:56] <ti> so how is everyone
  63. [10:56] <Xenony> hi
  64. [10:57] <FighterFaD> Breaking the Banhammer
  65. [10:57] <FighterFaD> An agent may come to the forum in question with an anti-authoritarian, anarchist tone. This seems legitimate enough at first glance, as any research or activist forum is certain to be aware of the corruption of "The System", and those in charge of it. However, by directing this anti-authoritarian attitude towards the very moderation team who are there to ensure that research and activism can take p
  66. [10:57] <FighterFaD> lace, they attempt to undermine the authority of and respect for the moderation team. "You mean you're banning people? Aren't you about free speech, the constitution?" Etc. This is a technique known as "Occupatio", and presents the moderator with a catch-22; either ban the troublemaker and lend credence to the claim that the moderation team is hypocritical, or don't ban him and continue listening t
  67. [10:57] <FighterFaD> o him complain about how the site's staff is hypocritical.
  68. [10:57] <FighterFaD> If there are other agents on the forum, and the moderators ban the troublemaker, they may begin hurling accusations of "witch hunts" and "McCarthyism" at the moderators, attempting to rile the userbase into a shitstorm against the moderators. Divide and conquer.
  69. [10:58] <Xenony> sounds like ur a politician wnat to argue that a dictatorship is better than democracy..
  70. [10:58] <FighterFaD> thank you for providing a perfect example of "breaking the banhammer"
  71. [10:59] <Xenony> so u really think dictatorships work better?
  72. [10:59] <Xenony> okay... your point of view... now find people to share.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!