Advertisement
Guest User

Airborne Aids

a guest
Dec 16th, 2020
124
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 5.55 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Even if it seems quite far fetched to some, at least personally and until the facts dictate otherwise, I tend to view the resulting disease COVID-19 that emanates from an infection with SARS-Cov-2 as a form of airborne acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
  2.  
  3. See for example:
  4.  
  5. SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
  6.  
  7. Liguo Zhang, Alexsia Richards, Andrew Khalil, Emile Wogram, Haiting Ma, Richard A. Young, Rudolf Jaenisch
  8.  
  9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516
  10.  
  11. Abstract
  12.  
  13. Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after recovery, yet these patients most commonly are non-infectious. Here we investigated the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome and that transcription of the integrated sequences might account for PCR-positive tests. In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells and primary cells of patients, consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome. To experimentally corroborate the possibility of viral retro-integration, we describe evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse transcribed in human cells by reverse transcriptase (RT) from LINE-1 elements or by HIV-1 RT, and that these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed. Human endogenous LINE-1 expression was induced upon SARS-CoV-2 infection or by cytokine exposure in cultured cells, suggesting a molecular mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 retro-integration in patients. This novel feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery and suggests a new aspect of RNA virus replication.
  14.  
  15. Competing Interest Statement:
  16.  
  17. The authors have declared no competing interest. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516v1
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22. Yet more interesting indictators that point approximately in the same direction:
  23.  
  24. SARS-CoV-2 invades host cells via a novel route: CD147-spike protein https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.14.988345v1
  25.  
  26. Infection of human lymphomononuclear cells by SARS-CoV-2 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.28.225912v1.full
  27.  
  28. The analysis of the long-term impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the cellular immune system in individuals recovering from COVID-19 reveals a profound NKT cell impairment https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.21.20179358v1
  29.  
  30. The ORF8 Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Mediates Immune Evasion through Potently Downregulating MHC-I https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.24.111823v1
  31.  
  32. Multi-organ impairment in low-risk individuals with long COVID https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.14.20212555v1
  33.  
  34. Spike glycoprotein and host cell determinants of SARS-CoV-2 entry and cytopathic effects https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.22.351569v1
  35.  
  36. Single-cell analyses reveal SARS-CoV-2 interference with intrinsic immune response in the human gut https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.21.348854v1
  37.  
  38. An insertion unique to SARS-CoV-2 exhibits superantigenic character strengthened by recent mutations https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263503/
  39.  
  40. Immunologically distinct responses occur in the CNS of COVID-19 patients https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.11.293464v1
  41.  
  42.  
  43. And
  44.  
  45. SARS-CoV-2 Uses CD4 to Infect T Helper Lymphocytes https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.25.20200329v1
  46.  
  47. ORF3a mediated-incomplete autophagy facilitates SARS-CoV-2 replication https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.12.380709v1
  48.  
  49. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG from severely ill COVID-19 patients promotes macrophage hyper-inflammatory responses https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.13.190140v1
  50.  
  51. Persistent SARS-CoV-2 presence is companied with defects in adaptive immune system in non-severe COVID-19 patients. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.26.20044768v1
  52.  
  53. Post Viral syndrome Covid-19 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7320866/
  54.  
  55. The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7320866/
  56.  
  57. Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.20.20215863v1
  58.  
  59. Human cardiac stromal cells exposed to SARS-CoV-2 evolve into hyper-inflammatory/pro-fibrotic phenotype and produce infective viral particles depending on the levels of ACE2 receptor expression https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.06.20226423v1
  60.  
  61. SARS-CoV-2 D614 and G614 spike variants impair neuronal synapses and exhibit differential fusion ability https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.03.409763v1
  62.  
  63. Clinically identifiable autoreactivity is common in severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.21.20216192v2
  64.  
  65.  
  66. ​Unusual Medications used for Sars-Cov-2
  67.  
  68. Glecaprevir and Maraviroc (Hiv Medications) are high-affinity inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease
  69.  
  70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32441299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268261/
  71.  
  72. Pharmacologic profiling reveals lapatinib(Breast Cancer Drug) as a novel antiviral against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.25.398859v1
  73.  
  74. Ribavirin(Hep-C Drug) shows antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 and downregulates the activity of TMPRSS2 and the expression of ACE2 In Vitro https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.04.410092v1
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement