API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Lesta

5 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-03 0455 +cabadejo

Lesta
Feb 2nd, 2016
49
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 8.39 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-03 0455 +cabadejo
  2. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/XgbTYcVjQgG
  3. https://pastebin.com/eV6JyS5X
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +cabadejo __ I would think that if there was a moderation/filtering issue it has now been put on hold *given that we suspect it* and so any tests will fail leading us to think it was a "twice-off YouTube glitch".
  8.  
  9. It was the fact both you and Terran had *initial* difficulty that needs to be remembered. Recall that you initially told me your comment was removed but then later it was a mistake. That indicates to me it was a "moderated comment" and normally a person is never going to know it has happened.
  10.  
  11. Terran on the other hand took screenshots. *His comment mentioning my name was objectively not there.*
  12.  
  13. Of course - it may be beyond Reds Rhetoric's control - the "censorship" could be happening at an even higher level (and so it only seems like it is caused by him). It could be that YouTube has a filter for the name/word "Lesta" or "Lesta Nediam" and automatically places it in spam or holds it for moderation. Or does this only for certain channels.
  14.  
  15. But my messages appear to go through on "NASA" videos - if I was being censored in that way you'd think my comments wouldn't show up in "NASA" videos given my "thing" with "Scott Kelly".
  16.  
  17. Now it gets a little complex: unless the censorship is occurring *"per IP address"* and thus if I used another computer in another suburb my comment won't be seen - *but the fact you can see my comments in England* is enough to say it's not being outright censored".
  18.  
  19.  
  20. As I say - forgive the complexity of the "censorship knot" because I can foresee a time when the following happens (in the future to "genuine dissidents"):
  21.  
  22. __
  23. *It could also be that a large group of people are "algorithmically determined to be truthers" and can therefore view my comment but everyone else cannot.*
  24.  
  25. That would represent _"world-class censorship"_ and could be the direction we are being taken.
  26.  
  27. (A platform like YouTube is intentionally a "troll paradise" allowing these "complex forms of censorship" to be tested.)
  28. __
  29.  
  30.  
  31. But having said all of that - you have in the past mentioned my name on discussion threads and yet those messages went through and so if that "higher level filtering" is now happening it is a recent innovation.
  32.  
  33. __
  34.  
  35. With everything said and done - *it might be worth revisiting this issue in a few months' time to see if a filter has been imposed* (higher level and/or individual channels).
  36.  
  37. __
  38.  
  39. If it was just a "glitch" then no doubt I've given him (and others!) the idea and a "how to"! (A "forbidden person" can leave comments but no one can ever talk about that "forbidden user"!)
  40.  
  41. __
  42.  
  43. In related _but yet also unrelated_ news. *How about his use of "Poe" to describe Jeranism?* Suddenly "the opposition" are calling people Poe?! (Ever since my "SurfPOEzel" posts)?
  44.  
  45. Is it just another "coincidence" (a "poeincidence")?! _Oh I'm sure it is!_
  46.  
  47. (That's why I referred to him in my request video as "big ears" - it's "aussie slang" but can also have an additional meaning. Just a friendly jibe as to _how it all seems._)
  48.  
  49. __
  50.  
  51. For my "step three" video I need a response from Reds Rhetoric ("ISS" footage that he personally vouches for). But if I don't get that from him then we simply go to "step four".
  52.  
  53. *How long do you think I should give him to provide a link to "ISS" footage he vouches for?* A week? Two weeks? A month? A year?
  54.  
  55. He must by now surely be aware of the request. But I can't be certain. *If he isn't yet aware then there are other people are who would have passed it on.* But again - _I can't be certain of that._
  56.  
  57. And so if he doesn't respond (or acknowledge the request) soon then I will be forced to post another video and write him a personal comment *as well as a Google Plus post that references not just his username but the usernames of everyone he is associated with.* In other words - if he is going to make me "beg" (which I thought he would but hoped he wouldn't) then I am going to make sure everyone knows about the request - *_and then some._*
  58.  
  59. For you see I have enough footage of Reds Rhetoric in various videos and Hangouts telling his dribbling and drooling colleagues how the "opposition" are always _"avoiding uncomfortable evidence and truths"_ *and so it would awful for him [though hilarious for us] to compile all of that into a video and post it along with a repetition of my hitherto AVOIDED request plus a Google Plus post that references him and 20+ usernames of his buddies and pals.*
  60.  
  61. After that the claim my request was not known about will no longer fly. Failure to comply can only look bad for him. *Wouldn't a man of science just love to shove such footage into the face of a "conspiracy theorist"?*
  62.  
  63. _So one has to wonder what is taking so long._
  64.  
  65. Could it be he is looking for the most convincing footage? Surely ANY of the footage would do. If it's real then it's ALL real, right? Or is he going to acknowledge that much *(and right now I must insist ALL)* of the alleged "ISS" footage is fake and fabricated? (This side of things is going to come up again in a subsequent step.)
  66.  
  67. __
  68.  
  69. If he is aware that all of the footage is "BS" then he likely won't acknowledge the request.
  70.  
  71. I do somewhat expect a video response that disproportionately attacks me (I have at all times been civil with him and in particular with my request - *I have never written anything negative or aggressive to him*). It is always a bad idea to defend a bad idea and those defending a bad idea can behave like wounded animals and lash out disproportionately. It is a possibility. He also seems to surround himself with people who spend their time making fun of other people and some of that has by now probably rubbed off on him.
  72.  
  73. __
  74.  
  75.  
  76.  
  77. *ANY response from him that DOES NOT have to do SPECIFICALLY and EXCLUSIVELY with "ISS" footage SHOWING DISCERNIBLE DETAILS that Reds Rhetoric PERSONALLY VOUCHES FOR MUST be interpreted as WEAKNESS AND DEFEAT.*
  78.  
  79.  
  80.  
  81. __
  82.  
  83.  
  84. I am waiting for one of the following four outcomes: (he is welcome to surprise me with a 5th - but I doubt that will happen):
  85.  
  86.  
  87. 1. *He avoids my request completely* and carries on "business as usual" working with Jeranism and squandering his time talking to outright flat Earthers but not spending a second of his time with Lesta doing something positive. *Even though any of those flat Earthers could easily ask Reds Rhetoric on my behalf and if they were genuine they would.* I don't care WHO he responds to *just so long as he gives footage he personally vouches for.*
  88.  
  89.  
  90. 2. *He avoids my request and makes only an attack video on Lesta.* (He may even seek out the help of his hate-filled cancer magnet "buddies" (who are his obvious "influences" on YouTube) - and that could even be what's taking so long for his response.)
  91.  
  92.  
  93. 3. He completes the request but the footage he vouches for comes with an attack on Lesta. If he does give footage he vouches for then this is the option I estimate he would be inclined to go with. To go with the fourth option it would mean resisting the temptation of this third option.
  94.  
  95.  
  96. 4. He complies with the request and does not b!tch and m0an or carry on about it. *If Reds Rhetoric is a good, honest, rational and reasonable person then that is what he will do.* The fourth option should be easily done for someone who is intellectually secure and confident in his views.
  97.  
  98.  
  99. __
  100.  
  101.  
  102. Every day that passes where the footage he personally vouches for is not made available *only makes him seem less and less like a good, honest, rational and reasonable person.* Every day that passes where he spends his time focused on Jeranism instead of this makes it more and more apparent that he is here for the wrong reasons. All he has to do is LINK me to the necessary footage - *he does not have to go any further out of his way!*
  103.  
  104.  
  105. __
  106.  
  107.  
  108. _As the Chinese like to say: *May you live in interesting times!*_
  109.  
  110.  
  111.  
  112. __________________________________________
  113. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  114. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  115.  
  116. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  117. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  118.  
  119. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  120. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  121.  
  122. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  123. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!