Quantitative Update on Pure Evil

Quantitative Update on Pure Evil
--------------------------------

There's a logical problem inherent to defining pure evil as something that can only be countered by way of Dynamic Quality. The problem is that if someone, who would attempt to prove the existence of God by means of logic, read such a definition, they might start attempting to define Dynamic Quality. Such people really exist.[1]

For us civilized people it should be obvious that to define pure evil as something that can only be countered by way of Dynamic Quality isn't to define pure evil, because the definition isn't logically well-formed due to including the concept of Dynamic Quality.

In fact, to define pure evil as something that can only be countered by way of Dynamic Quality appears to be downright wrong according to the Aldiode.

(Note that some people have thralled Pirsig for uttering statements like "If I understand the MOQ correctly...". These people do not understand that Pirsig isn't the MOQ. In ancient times, these kind of people needed to be told that people who speak about God aren't gods.

These kind of people are everywhere. Even as mental hospital nurses they will giggle at patients who admit they aren't infallible. The improvement from ancient times is that nowadays these cowards know what they're doing is wrong, so they will make sure no other staff members hear them when they abuse patients.)

The highest form of excellence is as good as the purest evil is bad, but the feminine self is even better than the purest form of evil is bad.

This doesn't mean pure evil is safe. A woman might persuade a man to comply with pure evil imagining that she can decide not to be affected by that. For example, a liberal woman might imagine that she can decide to feminise her man and have sex with other men and that this means everyone she meets is free. But if some other man put her in a submissive state of mind and then thralled his man to her for complying with her insistence that pure evil is safe, she wouldn't want to have sex with her man again. Hence, this is an illusion of freedom and the decision of the woman isn't a real decision because any stranger could change that decision with little effort. It is a whim instead of a decision.

[1] https://github.com/FormalTheology/GoedelGod