Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- ********************
- Spider-Man 3 Sub Download
- http://urllio.com/r2oq2
- (Copy & Paste link)
- ********************
- Everything is lining up great for Peter he has finally got the love of his life Mary Jane Watson to marry him. But one night when the strange meteor crash's it clangs on to peter bonding him with an alien symbiote suit. This changes peter once the symbiote is attached by to him he changes his life around.Once he finds out his uncle's real killer is still alive who's Flint Marko/sandman he seeks revenge as his ex best friend harry Osborn becomes the new goblin and peter deals with Eddie Brock. Once peter realizes that he is doing everything wrong he decides only one way you can make it right by getting rid of the alien symbiote suit by riping it off which eventually leads to the birth of venom. peter now faces all the darkest demons as he also tries to win back Mary Jane Watson.
- A strange black entity from another world bonds with Peter Parker and causes inner turmoil as he contends with new villains, temptations, and revenge.
- "Spider-Man 3" is the final installment from Sam Raimi's trilogy on everybody's favorite spider. In contrast to films 1 and 2, it did not achieve any Academy Award nominations (let alone, wins), but ended up as the most successful film from 2007 in terms of box office. 3 years later, only the second "Shrek" movie was seen more often than "Spider-Man 2", but in 2007, "Spider-Man 3" beat "Shrek 3". Unfortunately, this does not mean that it is as good as the second film. It's slightly worse and way worse than the first in my opinion. I would not go so far and say that this was due to Raimi being involved with writing for the first time too here, but it had more to do with the fact that 4 super heroes/villains are just too many for one movie. The previous 2 films worked so well because it was this 1 vs 1 mentality that shone both times. Part 3 is also the longest film so far and they certainly cut have cut a bit, for example why include Harry's amnesia early on if he turns out the way he ended up in film 2 anyway. A bit of a pointless inclusion.<br/><br/>Talking about Harry, this is almost more of a Green Goblin film than a Spider-Man movie. James Franco became more and more popular than Maguire, so he got most of the interesting scenes here and easily much more character development. Also he ends up saving Spidey's life more than once and it is very telling that the franchise pretty much ended with his death. Back to the villains here, they are just both fairly forgettable. While I liked, they way that Venom was animated, they simply could have done so much more with the character, but definitely came short here. Also, Topher Grace's character is the only antagonist from the trilogy, who has no real "justifiable" events happening that make him turn evil. James Cromwell plays a nothing character and even Rosemary Harris has no material that she can shine with just like in the last two films. It's fairly ridiculous how Parker always reveals himself as Spider-Man in situations where everybody could actually see him, like early on during that date with Mary Jane. Talking about Mary Jane, she needs to be rescued once again at the end. Getting a bit old by now. Another criticism would be that it is just too much of a coincidence that it's exactly the guy who shot Ben who turns into a sand mutant.<br/><br/>Well.. these were quite some negative points, but here and there, the film also had a couple strong moments. It's a movie about fatherhood, friendship, betrayal and forgiveness. If you liked films 1 and 2, you should still give this one a go and be it only for reasons of closure. Recommended.
- Unlike the previous two Spider-Man films, I did not see this one on the big screen. In fact, I didn't see any movies in theatres last year, other than "The Simpsons Movie". I finally just got around to renting "Spider-Man 3" after New Year's. Looking here on IMDb before watching it, it seemed to be polarizing, not as highly praised as the previous two installments, so I watched it with mixed expectations. Since it turned out to be sort of a mixed blessing, I guess I'm glad I had those expectations.<br/><br/>At the moment, Peter is very happy. His life as Spider-Man is no longer interfering with his life as Peter Parker. However, one problem still unsolved is Harry still believes that Spider-Man killed his father, and now knows that Peter is Spider-Man! Peter's former best friend gets new powers, a lot like the ones that possessed his father, and becomes the New Goblin! In a battle between Peter and Harry, Harry falls and has to be hospitalized. While suffering from short-term memory loss, he remembers Peter as his friend again, but will his recent memories come back? Meanwhile, Flint Marko, who unbeknownst to Peter is Uncle Ben's real assassin, has escaped from prison! While running from the police, Flint becomes the Sandman, a new enemy for Spidey! Sadly, Peter's problems don't end there, as one night, he is possessed by a symbiote, one which makes him more powerful, but also makes him lose self control and become more aggressive! <br/><br/>Watching "Spider-Man 3" once, I noticed more flaws in it than I ever have in its two predecessors, and I have seen both of them several times. First off, Harry's attack on Peter begins a bit too suddenly. Peter is riding his motorcycle, and Harry (as the New Goblin) just suddenly appears and immediately grabs him. It probably should have shown Harry coming first. Right now, it sounds like I'm making way too big a deal out of a minor problem, but there are more. One ridiculous part is where Peter kisses Gwen Stacy while in his suit at a ceremony in Spider-Man's honour. This is while he is thinking about proposing to Mary-Jane! Why wouldn't he realize that this wasn't going to help their relationship? When Peter becomes possessed by the symbiote, he can't help but become a total jerk, but sometimes, it gets pretty silly, especially the part where Mary-Jane is trying to perform, and Peter interrupts by doing dance moves, apparently trying impress her, even though he's with another date.<br/><br/>Fortunately, this third "Spider-Man" movie does have some redeeming qualities, including some good action and excitement (as one would hope for), though there could have been more, and I would say the climax is quite good. In the humour department, there is one major highlight, which is the scene where J. Jonah Jameson is at his desk, and the loud buzzer keeps going off, shaking the desk and knocking stuff around. This part is probably funnier than anything in the first two films. There are some other funny scenes (not as funny as the one I mentioned, mind you), though the movie sometimes gets so cheesy that it may succumb to unintentional humour, which reminds me of "Power Rangers". In my book, the redeeming qualities of "Spider-Man 3" earn it a 6/10, but the downsides earn it nothing higher than that. Apparently, "Spider-Man 4" has been confirmed. Hopefully, it will be better than this one, but there's a good chance it won't be (you know how sequels go).
- Given that Spider-Man 2 was twice as fun as the first, it's triply disappointing what an overwrought bore S3 turns out to be.
- Another answer can be like a reference to the 1994's Spiderman: The Animated Series, when he accidentally found the weak of the Symbiote in a fight with Shocker in the "The Alien Costume" saga. The answer is twofold; Eddie worked for the daily bugle and thus likely found out about Marko's escape and motives as the bugle was covering it. He then bonds with the Symbiote which retains its memories of its time bonded with Peter including the fight in the subway. Eddie Brock Jr. could have been brought back for a sequel or spinoff (but hasn't and won't). Additionally, the Symbiote is still alive in a couple places—remember that Dr. Connors still has a piece of the Symbiote. It is widely believed that the Symbiote that Connors has will eventually bond with the yet-to-be-introduced character of Cletus Kasady to form Carnage, as was the case in the comics that Carnage was created in Venom's wake. It was announced in July 2008 that there was Venom spinoff in early pre-production that would follow Spider-Man 3 (but seemingly it was cancelled with the discontinuation of the main movie series). Topher Grace possibly would not have returned for the role, as there had been several other hosts to the Venom Symbiote in the comics that could be used in a solo film, including the short lived Angelo Fortunato, and the Scorpion aka "Mac" Gargan. Eddie Brock, meanwhile, had the bits of Symbiote left over in his blood bond to his white blood cells, giving him a new white Venom-like suit. Along with a more altruistic attitude, Brock calls himself Anti-Venom. A potential spinoff could have followed either of these plots. (Source: here.) Ultimately the fates of the characters in the Tobey Maguire Spider-Man continuity is unknown, and similar is the case with the later Andrew Garfield Spider-Man reboot continuity, since the movie franchise was rebooted one more time shortly thereafter. The song playing during Peter's street-dancing scene was "People, Get up, and Drive Your Funky Soul" by James Brown. It is an edited version, though, since the original was nine minutes long and was featured on James Brown's 1988 album Motherlode. This version is two minutes and 24 seconds. Possibly never. It is still unknown at this time when or if it will be released. It is also unknown what the running time would be. Sam Raimi has not made any statements about a Director's Cut, although Columbia has been known to release extended director's cuts on DVD for other titles in the past, including Spider-Man 2.1. However, note that Columbia may no longer have the relevant rights (such as post-production in addition to distribution) to the Spider-Man cinema franchise, as the underlying copyright (or license) has gone from Columbia's control to Sony's and then to Marvel Studios'. The movie studios are unlikely to work out a deal, especially if it wouldn't be mutually profitable. If a Director's Cut home video release is ever made of this movie, it is likely to be called Spider-Man 3.1. Had a "3.1" DVD been made then it would have likely to been released to coincide with the theatrical release of the reboot movie The Amazing Spider-Man (2012) just like when the "2.1" DVD came out to coincide with the theatrical release of Spider-Man 3. But the odds of this had always been slim, given that The Amazing Spider-Man was the start of a new series. Had Spider-Man 4 been released in 2011, the studio probably would have released it as a Spider-Man 3.1 then. When the film was completed, the running time was set at 156 minutes on the IMDb page, then later reduced to 139 minutes. Therefore, about 17 minutes was cut from the final film. Note: Richard Roeper & Christy Lemire's review of the film presented the 156-minute running time on screen, but it is no longer available online. On a Sony Pictures discussion board thread archived here There was going to be a fourth movie but the studio eventually scrapped it in favor of a reboot. It was ultimately cancelled coming down to a combination of Sam Raimi and Sony Pictures not agreeing on an antagonist or villain for the film and Raimi hating the concocted storyline for the fourth film. Perhaps there was a way to save "Spider-Man 4"; but just as likely the studio folks tried all they could but to no avail, and it would've cost too much money had they kept on trying to agree on a villain or got more writers to draft the story. a5c7b9f00b
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
