Israel-Trump collusion

Trump won because of Israel. How? Regardless of views, I suggest reading this.

Firstly, it's worth bearing in mind the 2016 had two key unusual events; both parties had an 'outsider' gain inside popular track. Republicans had Donald Trump, and Democrats had Bernie Sanders. Both were divisive contenders. Both would fracture their respective parties.

In doing so, an otherwise coherent mainstream set of parties who otherwise held a stranglehold on politics, quickly became disrupted. Democrats split their support between either Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders, and establishment Republicans tried to attack and oust Trump.

In doing so, both parties played right into their hands. What's the best way to win an election? Make sure you have a member on both teams as frontrunner.

It's no secret Bernie Sanders is Jewish, despite publicly shunning AIPAC:

"To cast Mr. Sanders, whose father immigrated to the United States to escape antisemitism in Europe, as just another privileged old white male running for president flagrantly ignores his Jewish identity."

https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-op-0421-sanders-jewish-20190417-story.html

Nor is it any secret that Trump has ties to Judaism:

"Trump would be the first president to be the parent and grand-parent of observant Jews. Ivanka’s husband, real-estate magnate Jared Kushner, is an Orthodox Jew and one of Trump’s top advisers."

https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/207978/trumps-jews


You see, there was something that struck me as strange that occurred during the 2016, that bothered me until this year. Trump won because of the Electoral College (which by itself, isn't unusual). For those unfamiliar, the Electoral College is where elected representives go to vote on a president (usually between two choices; in 2016 it was between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump), a system supposedly to prevent the "tyranny of majority" as argued by John Stuart Mill.

Alas, no, it was the decision of Bernie Sanders supporters (of whom some were representatives), not only to not cast their vote for Hillary Clinton (revenge for Hillary cheating Bernie out of the primaries), but to actively vote for Trump. This is despite the fact Trump and Sanders are ideologuely diametrically opposed (Bernie is publicly a socialist who supported national healthcare, Trump a capitalist who supported privatisation of healthcare).

"Two surveys estimate that 12 percent of Sanders voters voted for Trump. A third survey suggests it was 6 percent."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/08/24/did-enough-bernie-sanders-supporters-vote-for-trump-to-cost-clinton-the-election/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.32f788e73909


Of course, for Trump to gain any sort of groundswell, he would need an online presence (something akin to 'Q'). This is where Democrats came unstuck - because they so obsessively blamed Russia for anything and everything, they failed to see what was right before them, and why Trump was so confident they were wrong.

You see, Trump never 'repaid' any favours to Russia, and the best argument a liberal could come up with is 'maybe Russia wanted chaos'. Maybe. But do you know who did receive direct benefits? Israel. They received the Jerusalem Embassy recognition from Trump, recognition of the Golan Heights being under their domain, sanctions against Iran, 7 countries with predominantly Islamic ties (Islam has typically seen Israel as hostile), and yet another President eager to continue war in Syria (Trump would flipflop on the Syria position between 'punishing Assad' and 'withdrawing troops' as public sentiments changed but action would be lacking).


Even a lot of 'Q' types comment how Trump appears to be under the influence or suggestion of some unknown third party. What might surprise Qanon types is Rod Rosenstein has historically voted Republican (so yes, his 'investigation' of Trump is merely for show, and hence why he pivoted 180 after the investigations' conclusion), and again, it's no secret regarding his religious affiliation either:

"Not much surfaces about Rosenstein’s Jewish involvement online, but he has been affiliated with Jewish institutions in the past. He was a member of Bethesda’s Reform Temple Sinai from 2008 to 2014, and of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum from 2001 to 2011."

http://www.jewishledger.com/2017/05/rod-rosenstein-5-things-know-man-helped-get-comey-fired/


Of course, the question most people would ask is 'why now?'. Why has this giant, singular concerted effort to subvert parties on both sides of the aisle been instigated?

Because it appears Israel are losing the PR war. It's no secret that the IDF (Israeli Defence Force) itself publicly shills in favour of Israel, typically under sock accounts, nor is it a secret that students are hired as cheap online labour to do likewise in order to distance that involvement, as USA Today wrote:

"Israel is looking to hire university students to post pro-Israel messages on social media networks — without needing to identify themselves as government-linked, officials said Wednesday."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/08/14/israel-students-social-media/2651715/

Except such tactics haven't been working. More and more members of the Democrat party are opposed to Israel's apartheid policies involving discrimination, and the BDS (Boycott, Divest, Sanctions) movement has been growing to such a threshold that Israel has urged lawmakers (in various places, including America, Canada and Britain) to create rules banning criticism of Israel and banning BDS, including threats of jail and loss of employment:

"Pitman, an Obama appointee, found that the state [of Texas] could not prohibit boycotting the state of Israel as a condition of public employment."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/04/26/god-is-great-third-time-federal-judge-blocks-an-israel-boycott-ban-first-amendment-grounds/?noredirect=on

This in turn explains why Trump seems to be eager to punish Julian Assange, despite the fact Julian's publication of the Clinton emails went a long way to destroying Clinton's narrative. In-fact, Julian comments are pretty much self-explanatory:

"Hislop adds that Assange went on to claim that Private Eye was "part of a conspiracy led by the Guardian which included journalist David Leigh, editor Alan Rusbridger and John Kampfner from Index on Censorship – all of whom 'are Jewish'"."

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2011/mar/01/julian-assange-jewish-conspiracy-comments

Whether or not Assange comments were accurate or not is irrelevant - it's evident he was concerned there was a concerted effort to undermine him by either Israeli or Jewish efforts. Should we be really surprised if a religious group works in tandem? We see similarly with Islam or Scientology, so this shouldn't also surprise us.


Alas, the Democrat investigation failed because it looked in the wrong place to begin with. There was no Russia-Trump collusion (which the Democrats, so far up themselves, refused to disburse themselves of the notion despite evidence to the contrary), there is however plenty of evidence of Israel-Trump collusion if one so much as cares to look.