7 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-13 1945 +Brian Hill

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-13 1945 +Brian Hill
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/DKpbnrv1dAp
https://pastebin.com/dxBaeWkc
__


+Brian Hill __ To the witnesses I ask you a question at the end of this reply.

*To "Brian Hill":* Your answer to my question was: *_"I am not sure"._* How on _God's flat Earth_ is that a satisfactory answer? Suppose my response to your question was _"I'm not sure"_ would you be content with that? Unlikely.

You have cited that specific alleged earthquake aftermath footage as EVIDENCE of the "Nepal earthquake" being GENUINE.

__

Note: a link to the footage and my response to it can be found here: https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/DKpbnrv1dAp

__

If the footage you have provided *does not* stand up to scrutiny then it *cannot* be considered "evidence" or "proof" of anything.


(It becomes proof only of *your acceptance* of the *appearances of proof* in place of *actual proof* itself.)


It is *VERY IMPORTANT* as to whether the watch face was covered by *DIRT* or whether it was the result of *MOTION BLUR* or whether it had been digitally blurred in *EDITING.*

If it had been intentionally blurred then that is *very significant.* That would constitute as *proof of shenanigans* and the footage *must* be dismissed.

The very last thing any *genuine skeptic* should be doing is accepting or taking seriously any purported evidence that *does not stand up to scrutiny* especially if it just so happens to also agree with your current *belief bias.*


__

It is the easiest thing in the world to call something real if all you are doing is accepting proof's appearances instead of actual proof.

"Jeff C" ("NWA" / "New World Agenda") and pals do that so often that it must surely be a strategy. He is known for showing his audience some images of an event and remarking about how "real" it appears to him even though at all times that can be an opinion only.

But what is far worse is that "Jeff C" has been caught showing images from an unrelated event but talking about the image as though it comes from a current event.

*"Near enough" is NOT good enough.*

"Jeff C" is either a "worthless researcher" or he is *thoroughly dishonest.* As far as I am concerned he is *both* of these things.

__


Simply accepting something because it agrees with your belief bias is outrageous. Dismissing and disregarding something found in that footage just because it doesn't conform to your belief bias is outrageous.

That will not do. That isn't good enough. Anyone who does that cannot be taken seriously.

If after all of this time you ("Brian Hill") are accepting proof's appearances instead of actual proof then you aren't a "researcher". You aren't a "truther". *You are a TUMMY TRUTHER. You are someone who says "this is real because in my tummy it just feels real".*

__

You ("Brian Hill") are calling Lesta a "liar" and a "professional deceiver" and you are also saying that I am avoiding your questions *but you cannot substantiate ANY of your claims.*

You are playing games.

Your name has been TRASHED as far as I am concerned. You are now a nobody to me.

*Whether you are on a drunken bender or having a mental breakdown - you have DESTROYED your name.*

__


+Terran Downvale asked you a question: *what have you been reading/studying?* I echoed that question.

You have been accusing me of avoiding your questions but you seem to have no problem avoiding what is asked of you.

*Lead by example.* If you accuse someone of avoiding questions then DON'T YOU DARE avoid any yourself. If you claim someone else is avoiding questions that you have asked then you have NO RIGHT to avoid a genuine question from someone else!

So what have you been "reading" or "studying" to cause this "change" in you?

__

*Just what the f_kc have you been "studying" and "reading" to cause you to come to MY channel and to MY Google Plus and to MY comments section and be a rude as f_kc a$$h0le to me?*

Why aren't you ALSO doing that to "Jeff C" and his channel? Why are you focusing on Lesta? Why now and not earlier?

__

Your response of *"I'm not sure"* is not good enough. TRY AGAIN. Read my original question and answer it PROPERLY.

__

If you think your response of "I'm not sure" is satisfactory *then you must also find MY reply to you of "I'm not sure" equally satisfactory.*


>>>>> *If it's good enough for you then it's good enough for me.* _Right?_ <<<<<


What the f_kc is going on? Why are you doing this? You aren't fooling anyone with it. You can fool only fools - so why are you bothering? You know that you can only ruin your own name with me and others here?

Everyone else here have seen people come and go. Everyone else here have seen "Eddie J" pretend to be my "friend" only to flip out like you are now doing. You aren't the first person to do this. You aren't the first *scumbag* to come along and accuse me of lying. *Simply calling me a liar does not make me a liar.*

__

The unfortunate problem you're in is that you are hating on someone who is telling only the truth. The only way you can hate on me is therefore to:



1. *MAKE SH!T UP* (e.g., calling me a "liar" in every message without stating what you think has actually been lied about.)



2. *PLAY GAMES* (e.g., such as responding to my own questions with _"I'm not sure"_ while claiming that I am not answering your own questions.)



3. *OUTRIGHT LIE ABOUT ME* (e.g., assert that I have not made an effort to explain things to you when *I have indeed made a substantial effort with you* - as anyone can see on the links I have given on another thread which I will link people to in a moment.)

Links to several examples where I have taken considerable time and effort to explain things to you can be found on this thread:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/Rmuh5cJtgu8

*Note:* since my reply is now on a thread with dozens of messages you can simply read my reply archived here: https://pastebin.com/Si7tnzLP

How f_kcing dare you. Of everyone here on YouTube WHO THE F_KC TAKES AS MUCH TIME TO EXPLAIN THINGS TO PEOPLE - STRANGERS, PUPPET ACCOUNTS AND "FRIENDLIES" ALIKE?

No one makes more of an effort than me (who is my runner-up? Who is comparable to me and the time and effort I go to responding to people?). *You are WAY OUT OF LINE with your GARGABE you TWIT.*



4. *MISREPRESENT, TWIST and DISTORT.* Which all fall under the umbrella of the above things I have outlined. You are DEFINITELY doing these things. You are fooling no one. *You are insane.*



________

*TO MY WITNESSES:*

Do you feel that "Brian Hill" has answered my question properly and seriously? My question was as follows:

QUESTION TO "BRIAN HILL": *"Do you believe that is dirt obscuring the watch face or do you believe it was digitally obscured during editing?"*

The response I got from "Brian Hill" was:

"Brian Hill" replied with: *_"I'm not sure."_*



How is that possibly a satisfactory response?!


__

For someone who is citing that alleged earthquake footage as being REAL and GENUINE (i.e., he claims this is what convinces him it was a real earthquake) is that an appropriate response?

Or is it more indicative of someone who is playing games and seeking to relentlessly waste my time on endless garbage?



__________



*AFTERWORD*




Going forward I am considering calling this kind of thing the "LOTJO FLIP" after "Learn of the Jesuit Order" (or is it "disOrder") who for a LONG time he posted video after video asserting the "ISS" is fake and making fun of it only to SUDDENLY and WITHOUT WARNING post a video less than 2 minutes in duration claiming he "got it wrong" and now alleges the "ISS" is real.

He did not say WHAT caused him to change his mind. He does not say WHY this has happened NOW and not EARLIER.

In his video he says that his own name has been discredited. He is CORRECT. His own name and words are now TRASHED just like the name of "Brian Hill".

Let this be a lesson that we must always reject events for the RIGHT REASONS and not EVER for the wrong reasons. "LOTJO" never cited any GENUINE reasons to doubt the "ISS" - he just made videos making fun of it and talking about "air bubbles" which seemed extremely weak.

__

(I am highly suspicious of anyone who focuses on these so-called "air bubbles" without also citing the absence of "sufficient proof" such as sustained duration zero gravity footage that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans. Such as a five minute zero-g gymnastics routine from a single fixed camera etc. Anyone who has focused on rejecting the "ISS" without ever mentioning the right reasons is either a "worthless researcher" or is likely a plant like "LOTJO" was who will FLIP later on.)

__

Back to "Brian Hill".

*"Brian Hill" is someone who asserted that the alleged "Nepal Earthquake" was fake.* He also tried to prove to me that it contained "movie making" errors which could be found in the alleged "Nepal earthquake" footage.

This came as a response to a video I had posted asserting that *the "lie system events do not contain movie-making errors".*

"Brian Hill" then went on to show me one such purported "movie-making error" which had something to do with a "sign" as shown by some "drone footage".

He asserted that something about the sign had changed (from memory it was a "letter" or something) in such a way that proved a movie making error.

When I examined the issue I found that it was not a movie-making error but was instead a TRAP. That upon scrutiny it had a natural explanation and thus was not proof of fraud. It was simply the letter appeared to be different from the angle or something like that (I am writing from memory and if this is contested by "Brian Hill" then I will look through my past notes and comments and dig up his video on it).

On that note: "Brian Hill" has (as far as I know) deleted or hidden his "Nepal Earthquake" videos and so I cannot link you to any specific video.

HOWEVER - as I write - I have a copy of his video archived (just as I retain a copy of EVERY video I so much as glance at) and can show you the video I am talking about if he denies the claim and won't show the video if asked to see it.

__

It is curious to me that something like THAT (the TRAP with the "sign") would be convincing to "Brian Hill" that the alleged "Nepal earthquake" was fake *but when it comes to the watch face being obscured he is not at all phased by it.*

As I say - _his flip_ - this worthless REVERSAL - is not much different to "Learn of the Jesuit Order" and so I am going to refer to this kind of *tactic* as a "LOTJO FLIP".

*Given all that has happened. Given the near identical responses from "Brian Hill" that are reminiscent of "Eddie J" I strongly suspect this was the play for "Brian Hill" from the outset.*

I do not believe that "Brian Hill" is a legitimate person who cares about or values the truth. He is only interested in tarnishing my name and undermining any connection I have to my witnesses.

*He has failed. And all who try will also fail.*

______

I've written enough. It is CLEAR that "Brian Hill" is either on a drunken bender or is having some kind of a mental breakdown like "Eddie J" did.

*Because I do not tell lies he is having to call me a liar which means having to deny reality.*

Therefore "Brian Hill" - in a foolish effort to discredit me - must deny reality and become "temporarily insane".

The question is: will he be able to snap out of his insanity or is he going to completely lose the plot and f_kc off like a coward just like "Eddie J" did.

Either way - I don't care. He has SACRIFICED HIMSELF. He can NEVER be taken seriously by me again and it is unlikely he will ever receive a message this substantial from me again.

He is a time-wasting *loser* who took a gamble that he could make me look bad. He has had the opposite effect and revealed himself as an effective "agent provocateur".

*SHAME ON YOU "BRIAN HILL".*


________


Go have your mental breakdown SOMEWHERE ELSE.

*_Lesta spits on you._*



*LESTA'S REQUESTED WITNESSES:*
+Harry Houdini, +MsKickup, +Terran Downvale



__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w