https://twitter.com/RichHiggins_DC/status/1299434456198115329
Rich Higgins was a staffer at the National Security Council for the first six months of Trump’s presidency. He was ousted by HR McMaster, a globalist, pro-Islamist https://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2018/03/16/klein-six-lowlights-globalist-pro-islamist-h-r-mcmasters-career/ Never Trumper who promoted the Russia hoax while serving at the White House. Higgins was a Flynn hire and Trump’s people want him back in the Pentagon, but the Swamp does not https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/07/02/white-house-pentagon-trump-esper-directed-hiring-of-conspiracy-theorist-over-pentagon-objections-richard-higgins-national-security-council-flynn-rich-higgins/ .

Like many others, McMaster cashed in on his White House tour by publishing a negative book about President Trump during the run-up to the 2020 election. An entire industry has sprung up out of the weeds to print defamatory books about President Trump, authored by well-compensated former associates, family members, and their ghost writers and published by outlets who want Trump to lose.

Higgins has done just the opposite, penning a short article https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-white-house-fired-me-for-my-loyalty-11581526372 for the WSJ on what motivated him to write the 2017 memorandum that got him fired. “In contrast to Col. Vindman,” Higgins wrote, “I lost my job because I was loyal to the president.”

Vindman’s firing from the NSC was standard procedure, Higgins argued, citing his own as an example and describing his shock that “resistance seemed to be the NSC’s mission,” where Obama holdovers “assigned to develop plans for ending U.S. involvement in Afghanistan” would turn their assignments into “reasons it couldn’t be done” and McMaster would relay them to President Trump with explanations “why he couldn’t keep his campaign promises.”

“It was clear that the Trump presidency wouldn’t succeed unless the resistance was defeated.”

“Outnumbered and mostly ignored,” Higgins and the few other Trump loyalists drew a list of potential replacements for these Obama holdovers “who would carry out the new president’s agenda.” McMaster found out about it, called a meeting and said “There are no ‘holdovers.’ We are all on the same team”--leading Higgins to write his memo and McMaster to then fire the Flynn holdovers.

In the memo https://unconstrainedanalytics.org/potus-and-political-warfare/, Higgins said the Trump administration suffers from calculated information campaigns led by the news media and intended to end his presidency and destroy the country (as many https://nypost.com/2019/10/13/inside-the-medias-relentless-crusade-to-destroy-president-trump/ have https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/06/the_left_will_destroy_america_to_regain_power.html observed https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2016/09/10/how-to-destroy-america-from-within-n2216092); and that to counter this, the White House needs to drive their own narrative instead of reacting to the media’s and constantly backpedaling. If the White House fails to do this, Higgins wrote, there is a real chance that President Trump will be overthrown and with him, America will fall.

He further warns, no doubt referring to McMaster and others like him, that “many close to the president have pushed him off his message when he was candidate Trump thus alienating him from his base … When President Trump is not candidate Trump, he becomes dangerously exposed.”

These are not “politics as usual,” Higgins wrote in the memo, they’re the political warfare attacks of a Maoist Insurgency “directly targeting a seated president through manipulation of the news cycle.” He broadly defines a Maoist Insurgency as a group who form their own counter-state and infrastructure within another state, from which they try to seize power: synchronizing “violent and non-violent actions that focus on mobilization of individual and groups to action.”

This warfare and its agenda reflect the “cultural Marxist memes that dominate the cultural narrative ... coming from programs and activities that arise out of Gramsci Marxism, Fabian socialism and most directly from the Frankfurt School,” which was founded in the Weimar Republic of Post-WWI Germany, at the start of the Red Century https://www.city-journal.org/html/blood-red-century-15587.html.

During the Red Century this narrative has become a religion for the Left, who replaced God with equality and equality with diversity and tolerance--for me but not for thee. This is “designed to induce nihilistic contradictions that reduce all thought, all faith, all loyalties to meaninglessness”: for example, their mantra that gender and race are not biological; that American culture is racist https://www.westernjournal.com/leftist-propaganda-proves-trump-right-defund-anti-american-critical-race-theory; that abortion, nonsensically, is a woman’s right to her own body; that you’re an ignorant bigot if you believe in the Bible. Higgins rightly describes these contradictions as attacks against “all levels of group and personal identity.”

Opposition to the MAGA movement is centered around these Marxist contrivances, Higgins writes, noting that Trump has summarized them well: “Anyone who challenges [the establishment’s] control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe, and morally deformed.” Indeed, week after week for four years we’ve been told Trump is immoral, because he was politically incorrect about something or another.

Higgins goes on:

“Political correctness is a weapon against reason and critical thinking. This weapon functions as the enforcement mechanism of diversity narratives that seek to implement cultural Marxism. Candidate Trump’s rhetoric in the campaign not only cut through the Marxist narrative, he did so in ways that were viscerally comprehensible to his voting block.”

“Through the campaign, candidate Trump tapped into a deep vein of concern among many citizens that America is at risk and is slipping away… Attacks on President Trump are not just about destroying him but also about destroying the vision of America that led to his election.”

The Opposition behind this attack is an cross-section of groups who benefit from or have been captured by cultural Marxism. Among them Higgins names the msm and universities, the “deep state” bureaucracy, active Democratic and passive Republican leaderships, and globalists who consist of bankers and corporatists. “Certain business cartels” also ally themselves with this Marxist syndicate; for example, Big Tech companies having a change of heart https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/5/21281017/amazon-apple-facebook-response-george-floyd-michael-brown-tech-companies-google with BLM: not only making financial donations, but by aggressively spreading their message both in public statements on on their platforms.

Higgins makes a case for Islamists being key contributors and beneficiaries to the Marxist offensive, asserting that “they properly assessed that the far left has a strong chance of reducing Western civilization to its benefit … Islamists deploy [post-modern] narratives to strategically blind and then control US decision makers. This is by design and purposeful. ‘By their own hands!’ has been the declared strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood since 1991.”

“Globalists and Islamists recognize that for their visions to succeed, America, both as an ideal and as a national and political entity, must be destroyed.  Atomization of society must also occur at the individual level; with attacks directed against all levels of group and personal identity. Hence the sexism, racism, and xenophobia memes.”

The events that followed Higgins’ dismissal (Mueller’s “investigation” dragging on for two years despite having no predication and being riddled with illegality https://www.redstate.com/diary/johncleer/2020/08/19/senate-intel-committee-absolutely-no-russian-collusion-and-the-fbis-actions-were-deeply-troubling/; the Vindman-based https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/08/vindman-not-whistleblower-was-driving-force-behind-impeachment/ impeachment; the falsified https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/aug/31/crazy-bogus-thing-called-coronavirus-death-counts/ and Orweillien https://www.redstate.com/michael_thau/2020/09/03/ny-times-up-to-90-testing-positive-for-c19-virus-not-infectious-but-problem-actually-much-worse/ covid https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/aug/26/top-chinese-leadership-knew-about-and-knowingly-su/ statistics https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jul/22/florida-fake-false-coronavirus-positives-just-anot/; Floyd riots; the mailbox conspiracy) suggest that he was right.

Moving into the immediate future, Higgins tweets https://twitter.com/RichHiggins_DC/status/1299434456198115329 that the “current domestic political situation has decomposed into a national security issue”, which involves plans to siege the White House, and it starts this month:

“The 2020 political cycle is being utilized to mask the extremely hostile revolutionary nature of these events. Even the violence is a distraction. Current intelligence indicates that a siege of the White House may initiate on or about September 17th and culminate in a November 3rd election crises that carries on past the election.”

In other words, the discussion of the coming elections is meant at least in part to keep Americans from noticing the coup escalation. Are the Dems even trying to win votes? It doesn’t look like it.

An quick search finds this Canadian group https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/08/white-house-siege-organizers-release-new-tactical-briefings-image-white-house-flames/, whom the New York Times credit with starting https://archive.vn/dvev and “branding” https://archive.vn/19nEZ the Occupy Wall Street protests, plotting to “lay siege to the White House” for 50 days: from September 17, the anniversary of the Occupy movement, to November 3, Election Day. Their “tactical briefings” are posted here https://www.adbusters.org/campaigns/whitehousesiege-tactical-briefing-1:

“Lawyers are already in court, mounting pre-emptive strikes and preparing for the scorched-earth scenarios likely to come … Together we can organize pop-up sieges at federal buildings in dozens of cities … maybe even launch a national art project to decorate the streets with stunning visual memes… What can they do if hundreds of thousands of us turn up all over the nation’s capital, day after day.”

I can only assume they mean an art project like this.

“We’ll inspire a global movement of systemic change – a Global Spring – a cultural heave towards a true world order.”

In the thread https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1299434456198115329.html, Higgins said we are in the midst of a “color revolution” like those of the Arab Spring during Obama’s presidency and in the Ukraine in 2004 and 2014.

“Color revolutions” are an obscured repackaging of the red communist revolutions that began during World War I; instead of overtly being communist takeovers, they use vague pretexts of fighting injustice as vehicles to topple governments where globalist elites have a strategic interest.

The most famous communist or color revolution was the Red October of 1917, when the Russian Tsar and his young daughters were brutally murdered by international communists (not Russian). The red flag being the symbol of communism—chosen to represent bloodshed—was also raised in the Chinese Communist Revolution, starting like the Cold War in 1945. The Cold War was fueled almost entirely by the fear that this could happen to us.

And now it is; unlike the revolutions above, today’s directly targets America, likely through some combination of voter fraud, military force and litigation.

The msm are already setting the narrative: if Trump wins on election night, even in a landslide, he could still lose when the absentee ballots come in https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/01/trump-huge-lead-election-night-still-lose/. They are referring to this *hypothetical* scenario as a “red mirage,” and Hillary Clinton is telling Biden not to concede “under any circumstances"facebook.com/SeanHannity/videos/hillary-clinton-biden-should-not-concede-under-any-circumstances/4610617282289212/.

A “bipartisan” group of swamp operatives https://www.technocracy.news/john-podesta-plays-role-in-doomsday-plan-if-trump-is-re-elected/ started meeting in June to “game out” contested election scenarios, with John Pedosta playing Joe Biden in one of them. The Boston Globe has reported https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/08/03/nation/participants-who-gamed-out-what-contested-election-would-look-like-offer-recommendations/ on these exercises while predicting Trump will contest the results “in an attempt to hold onto power”; of course, they are implying the results will be legitimate, and there won’t be millions of fraudulent absentee ballots.

Can we rely on the mail-in system to process 80 million mail-in votes (as the New York Times has predicted https://archive.vn/CH5YM) and count them on time, prevent abuses and minimize discarded ballots? Is anything, at all, being done to prepare for this? You won’t read these questions in the Globe or any other liberal outlet. 28 million ballots went missing in the last four elections https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/04/24/28_million_mail-in_ballots_went_missing_in_last_four_elections_143033.html, or nearly nearly 20% of the mail-in votes, and they remain unaccounted for; and that came with much fewer votes to manage. Imagine a presidential election with 20% of the vote gone missing. It is my belief that they know this will happen and are counting on it: it’s the election crisis they’ve been working for.

The sentiment of that Globe article and the media narrative around it is that Trump is trying to prevent a fair election; and it appears this is being floated as a justification for taking the presidency by force.

Biden https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuRu6CO4Ab0 and Pelosi https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SB5qTdwLQvs both have said the military will physically remove President Trump if he doesn’t step down willingly; Crazy Bernie shares this perspective https://archive.vn/bPxOa, saying we "must be prepared for when Trump refuses to leave office" because Trump will claim “massive fraud within the mail-in ballot process” because “he will lose”; Chuck Schumer then tweets his support for Bernie. But how does Bernie know this?

Sanders “declined to answer whether he would call on his supporters to hit the streets if Trump refused to leave office,” as Politico wrote provocatively after prompting him. Does it concern him, they further asked, that General Milley told Congress the military won’t “resolve disputes if the election is contested”?

“It does.”

I get the sense that someone is feeding Bernie the answers, and it's obvious that Politico is being fed the questions, since every outlet is using the https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-fox-news-sunday-accept-election-2020_n_5f1459e9c5b6d14c33686eab same https://nypost.com/2020/07/19/trump-wont-say-whether-hell-accept-2020-election-results/ words https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/19/president-trump-wont-agree-to-accept-2020-election-results-as-biden-leads-in-polls.html to say the same https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/21/trump-election-2020-1374589 thing https://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-happens-if-the-president-doesnt-accept-the-election-results/ .

Pelosi also said https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SB5qTdwLQvs she was second-in-line, which could only be true under a delayed election where the winner isn’t called before noon on January 20 and the Dems hold the House (meaning Pelosi remains the Speaker). Long delays are a virtual certainty if 80 million mail-in ballots have to be processed, and from there the outcome would probably be tied up in litigation. Can you say President Pelosi?

Naturally, the Times are predicting a record turnout https://archive.vn/CH5YM to coincide with the expanded mail-in vote, and it goes without saying that these will all be real, living people who are eligible to vote and do so on their own https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/rhode-island-ballot-harvest-wsj.

Biden preemptively https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2020/07/02/biden-campaign-deploys-600-lawyers-so-trump-cant-steal-this-election/ hired 600 lawyers in June, and "gathered" 10,000 “volunteers,” under the pretext that he will fight “voter suppression”--by which he refers to any effort by Trump to prevent this massive, untested and unprecedented expansion of the absentee system.